TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 165X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cross examination of the main person (exporter) was not granted. We find that this issue would be considered at the time of appeal hearing. The applicants also submitted that they have filed salary certificates and bank pass books with their applications. In our view, the case relates to forging of the documents in export of the restricted items and the money would definitely not shown in their b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ₹ 4 lakhs c) Shri Diptesh Patel ₹ 3 lakhs d) Shri Manish Rajwani ₹ 5 lakhs 2. Shri Anil Navani, Shri Manish Rajwani and Shri Diptesh Patel appeared in person before the Bench. Shri Diptesh Patel submits that Shri Anil Pajapati is unable to appear before the Bench, as h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at all. 4. We reproduce the relevant portion of the stay order as under:- 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the records, we find that the Adjudicating Authority had imposed penalty on all those appellants for the role played by them in respect of forging of documents for the export of Non-Basmati Rice, Basmati Rice and also Murate of Potash (MOP). On evalu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d) Shri Manish Rajwani ₹ 5 lakhs. 5. Learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that the appellants had pleaded the financial hardships in their stay applications. It is seen that the Tribunal directed the pre-deposit after considering their role played in respect of forging of the documents for export of non-Basmati rice. The appl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
