Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Anil Prajapati, Shri Anil Navani, Shri Manish Rajwani, Diptesh Patel Versus Commissioner of Customs, Kandla

2015 (12) TMI 165 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Modification of stay order - Waiver of pre deposit - Held that:- Tribunal directed the pre-deposit after considering their role played in respect of forging of the documents for export of non-Basmati rice. The applicants submitted that the cross exam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ur view, the case relates to forging of the documents in export of the restricted items and the money would definitely not shown in their bank passbooks or salary certificates. So, the evidence placed by the applicants would not suffice to their fina .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hakur, Member (Technical) For the Petitioner : Shri Anil Navani, Shri Manish Rajwani, Shri Diptesh Patel For the Respondent: Shri Jitendra Nair, A.R. ORDER Per: P.K. Das 1. By Stay Order No.M/15821-15824/2014, dt.26.11.2014, the applicants were direc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

esh Patel appeared in person before the Bench. Shri Diptesh Patel submits that Shri Anil Pajapati is unable to appear before the Bench, as he is unwell. They submit that they have filed applications for modification of the stay order. It is submitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce on the decision of Honble Calcutta High Court in the case of Amitava Sava Vs CESTAT - 2007 (215) ELT 173 (Cal). 3. Learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that the Tribunal had given the finding that prima facie the applicants p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as under:- 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the records, we find that the Adjudicating Authority had imposed penalty on all those appellants for the role played by them in respect of forging of documents for the export of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n be considered at the time of final disposal of the appeal. At this juncture, we hold that none of the appellants made out the case for complete waiver of the pre-deposit of the amounts involved. Accordingly, we are of the view that they should be d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ni ₹ 5 lakhs. 5. Learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that the appellants had pleaded the financial hardships in their stay applications. It is seen that the Tribunal directed the pre-deposit after considering their role pl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version