Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Hiren M. Shah Versus The ACIT 17 (2) , Piramal Chambers, Mumba.

2015 (12) TMI 282 - ITAT MUMBAI

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to substantiate the claim of expenditure on account of commission payment - Held that:- The entire conspectus of facts emerging from record does establish that the assessee fail. So however, in order to hold the assessee guilty of “furnishing inaccurate particulars” within the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act, it is imperative to demonstrate that assessee is found to have made an erroneous or a false claim. Clearly, failure to substantiate a claim cannot be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

made by cheques and the requisite tax has also been deducted at source. The recipient has also confirmed receiving of commission payment from the assessee. The assertion of the appellant–assessee that similar payments made in the past have been allowed, is also not disputed by the Revenue. The aforesaid features of the claim do not establish that the claim made in the return of income was not a bonafide claim. While there may be justifiable reasons for disallowing the claim of expenditure, so h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

based on the disallowance effected during the assessment proceedings, where the only failure of the assessee was non-substantiation of the claim for expenditure. In our view, merely because the expenditure on account of commission payment has been found to be unsubstantiated and disallowed in assessment proceedings, the same ipso facto does not justify levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No.6671/MUM/2013, ITA No.6672/MUM/2013 - Dated:- 14-8 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs 2004-05 and 2006-07 respectively. 2. In both appeals, the solitary issue relates to the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271(1)(c) of the Act amounting to ₹ 3,50,528/- for A.Y 2004-05 and ₹ 1,22,400/- for assessment year 2006-07. Since the facts and circumstances leading to the imposition of penalty are identical in both the appeals, the appeal for assessment year 2004-05 is taken as lead case. 3. In this context, the brief facts are that the appellant is an individual, who .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by the assessee. The relevant discussion in the assessment order passed under section 143(3) dated 19/6/2006, reveals that the AO issued summons under section 131 of the Act to Shri Sandeep P. Shah and recorded his statement. The relevant extracts of the deposition made by Shri Sandeep P. Shah have been reproduced by the AO in the assessment order. Notably, the said person appeared before the AO and explained that he had earned commission income from the assessee for obtaining export orders f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

med by CIT(A) also. Not being satisfied with the order of CIT(A) on this aspect, assessee is in further appeal before us. 4. Before us, Ld. Representative for the assessee contended that there was no justification for the levy of such penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act because assessee had made adequate disclosure and all the material necessary for the assessment was disclosed. The Ld. Representative for the assessee, further, pointed out that similar payments made to the said person in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s claim of payment of commission was not genuine, and, therefore, penalty was rightly imposed for such a disallowance. 7. We have carefully considered the rival submissions. In the present case, assessee is engaged in the business of export of stainless steel utensils. The return of income filed by the assessee was accompanied by audited Balance sheet, Profit and loss account as well as the prescribed tax audit report. The Assessing Officer had noticed that under the head Selling and distributio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee and he also examined the recipient of commission i.e. Shri Sandeep P. Shah. The deposition made by Shri Sandeep P. Shah was also not found satisfactory by the AO though the said person confirmed having received commission from the assessee. The relevant discussion in the assessment order reveals that the AO was not satisfied with the services rendered by the said person as he could not produce the required details. This has formed the basis for the AO to levy penalty under section 271( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, it is imperative to demonstrate that assessee is found to have made an erroneous or a false claim. Clearly, failure to substantiate a claim cannot be equated to a case of making of a false or an erroneous claim. In fact, the mere making of a claim, which is not found sustainable by the Assessing Officer does not ipso facto justify furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income within the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act, as held by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Relian .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version