New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT

2015 (12) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT - 2015 (325) E.L.T. 833 (Del.) - Validity of order of settlement commission - Assessee made importation contrary to the provisions of Customs Act, 1962 as also the Foreign Trade Development & Regulation Act, 1992 - misuse of IEC Code - Held that:- Satish Aggarwala appearing for the petitioner/Directorate of Revenue Intelligence contends that the Settlement Commission has taken a very lenient view in imposing the fines and penalties. According to him, in a cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ceedings before the Settlement Commission. - Decided against Revenue. - W.P.(C) 9783/2015 & CM No.23515/2015 (stay) - Dated:- 16-10-2015 - Mr Badar Durrez Ahmed And Mr Sanjeev Sachdeva, JJ For the Petitioners : Mr Satish Aggarwala, Advocate for petitioners. For the Respondents : Mr Piyush Kumar, Advocate. JUDGMENT Badar Durrez Ahmed, J 1. This writ petition is directed against the final order No.F-2446-48/CUS/15-SC (PB) issued by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, New Delhi on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssued by the Additional Director of Revenue Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 2. At that stage, the respondents moved the aforesaid applications for settlement before the Settlement Commission. The settlement applications were allowed to be proceeded with and, ultimately, resulted in the impugned final order. The Settlement Commission observed and held as under:- 15. In the instant case also, mis-use of IE code is a charge in the SCN along with undervaluation. As such, the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evenue. The Bench observes that the applicant has made true and full disclosure of their duty liability and cooperated in the proceedings before the Commission. They have also deposited entire amount of duty demanded in the SCN. 16. So far as role of co-applicant 1 and 2 is concerned, it is clear from the investigations that the imported goods belonged to them and that they used the IE code of the applicant to import goods contrary to the provisions of the Act. The act of undervaluing the goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

terms of Section 14 of the Act read with Rule 9 of the Custom Valuation Rules. Customs Duty: The Customs Duty in this case is settled at ₹ 17,06,406/- (Rupees seventeen lakh six thousand four hundred six only) against the applicant. An amount of ₹ 17,06,406/- deposited by the applicant is ordered to be appropriated towards the settled amount of duty. Nothing further remains to be paid on this Count. Fine: A fine of ₹ 5,00,000/-( Rupees five lakh only) is imposed in lieu of con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version