Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri. B.V. Satyanarayana Rao Versus Commissioner of Income-tax- IV, Bangalore

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT(A) section 54F of the Act could not be allowed since assessee had returned capital gains after the detection - Held that:- CIT in his order mentions that assessee has sold two sites on 24.07.2008, whereas the first property against which exemption u/s.54F of the Act was purchased on 13.03.2008 and the second property was purchased on 06.08.2008. Obviously the first property was purchased prior to the sale of the sites on 24.07.2008. Disabling clauses (ii) and (iii) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. In other words, we are of the opinion that the order of AO did not have any error which was prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Order of CIT u/s.263 of the Act is set aside. - Decided in favour of assessee. - I.T.A No. 976/Bang/2014 - Dated:- 27-11-2015 - Shri Abraham P. George, Accountant Member And Shri Vijaypal Rao, Judicial Member For the Petitioner : Shri. R. Chandrashekar, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri. Sanjay Kumar, CIT -III ORDER Per Abraham P. George, Accountant Member In th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s, AO noted that assessee had omitted to include his transactions in an account with Canara Bank, Malur, in his accounts. Assessee stated that there was a cash deposit of ₹ 30,90,000/- in the said account which came out of sale of four sites not disclosed in the return of income. Assessee thereafter offered ₹ 11,58,289/- as short term capital gains and ₹ 5,55,525/- as long-term capital gains after claiming exemption u/s.54F of the Act, for investment in a residential property. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Act. CIT also noted that assessee would not be eligible for the claim of exemption u/s.54F of the Act since the admission of capital gains was after detection by the Department and not voluntary. Assessee made a reply to the above notice stating that the SB account with Canara Bank, Malur was placed before the AO, who had considered it before completing the assessment. Further as per the assessee, sale of two of the sites for ₹ 15 lakhs was made on 06.06.2008 prior to the investment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8 for ₹ 15 lakhs. Purchase of one residential house for ₹ 2,18,000/- was done by the assessee on 13.03.2008 and another house for ₹ 6,84,000/- on 06.08.2008. Relying on clause (ii) of proviso (a) to Section 54F(1) of the Act, CIT held that assessee had purchased one another residential house within one year from the date of transfer of the original asset thereby disentitling it from claim of deduction u/s.54F of the Act. Further as per the CIT it was difficult to establish nexu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m, the first issue raised by CIT in the notice was that assessee had not deposited the sale consideration in bank before appropriating it for purchase of the new asset. However, in the final order u/s.263 of the Act, there is no finding adverse to the assessee on this point. Secondly, according to the Ld. AR, AO had carefully considered assessee s explanation that deposits in the bank account were out of consideration received from sale of four sites and was satisfied. CIT, as per the Ld. AR, wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court in the case of CIT v. Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd [ITA.296 of 2013, dt.03.02.2015] and also that of Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v. Ashish Rajpal (320 ITR 674). 06. Per contra, Ld. DR submitted that AO had not done the enquiry as required under the law for correlating the deposits in the bank account with the sale of the assets. Further according to him once an assessee purchased one another residential property either within a period of two years from the date of transfer o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

wards the new asset was not deposited in any bank or institutor specified before the due date for filing the return of income, in terms of Section 54(2) of the Act. b) No nexus has been drawn by the Assessing Officer between the sale consideration of the capital asset as appearing in the conveyance deed and the amount of cash deposits appearing in your bank account. As no linkage is established, the cash deposits appearing in the bank accounts ought to have been taxed uls.68 of the Act as cash c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in your case for the A. Y. 2009-10 is silent on these points, the assessment concluded has become erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. In view of the above, it is proposed to invoke the provisions of Section 263(1) and in this connection an opportunity is given to explain your case. 08. Relevant part of the original assessment order in which the issue regarding the deposits in the Canara Bank account of the assessee has been dealt with by the AO, is reproduced hereunder : Durin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and his Authorised Representative agreed to offer ₹ 11,58,289/- as Short term Capital gains and ₹ 5,55,525/- as Long term Capital gains (after indexation and considering the re-investment in residential house property and allowing exemption u/s 54F of the IT Act. 1961) vide the assessee's letter dated 12/10/2011. 09. What we find is that AO had done an enquiry and accepted the claim of the assessee that the deposit of ₹ 30.90 lakhs in Canara Bank had come out of the sale of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ve. It is not a case where assessee had returned an amount and the AO had omitted to consider its admissibility or otherwise. It is a case where AO had discovered deposits in the bank account which were explained by the assessee to be out of sale of four sites. It is an admitted position that the sale deeds of the sites were produced by the assessee before the AO. In the face of this, to say that the AO had not done any enquiry would be incorrect. At the best it can be a case of enquiry not to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version