Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s K.S. Gupta & Sons

Validity of assessment order - CIT(A) held it as bad in law as so called other order was merely an untenable and concocted story which is non-cognizable and had no legal sanctity - Held that:- if the alleged order bears same DCR No.151/380 on the subsequent demand notice, then it may safely be inferred that allegations made by the ld. AR are correct that the Assessing Officer erred in framing the second order of the same date which was prejudicial to the assessee in comparison to earlier order. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

imself went wrong in holding valid service of notice and did not decide the legal objection of the assessee, the CIT(A) was quite balanced and justified in holding that the valid service of notice within time comes under serious doubt as the Assessing Officer has not brought out any fact on record to support valid service of notice on the assessee. Hence, we are unable to see any valid reason to interfere with the conclusion of the CIT(A) on this issue and we uphold the same. - Decided against r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion loss or rebate u/s 88E of the Act, the Assessing Officer can not label the assessee as dealer in shares and thus income derived therefrom cannot be treated as business income. The dicta laid down by Hon'ble High Court in the case of Jubilant (2011 (3) TMI 607 - DELHI HIGH COURT ) was followed and the CIT(A) granted relief to the assessee on justified and correct appreciation of fact and we are unable to see any valid reason to interfere with the same. - Decided against revenue - I.T.A.No.601 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing that the assessment order is bad in law as so called other order was merely an untenable and concocted story which is non-cognizable and had no legal sanctity. 3. Learned counsel of the assessee supported the impugned order and submitted that it was a very bad practice to substitute a new order in the place of earlier order which has been passed on the back of the assessee which was not only bad in law but void ab initio. 4. On careful consideration of the above, we note that the CIT(A) conc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e ACIT, Circle 1. The allegation made through the Grounds of Appeal is serious. The AR has placed on record a copy the assessment order of the ITO, Ward 1(2), Meerut dated 19.12.2008 in which returned income has been accepted. It is duly signed by the AO and bears his seal. It also bears DCR No.151/230. Demand of ₹ 26,380/- raised through this order has been paid for which the AR has placed copy of challan dated 10.1.2009 on record. The order under appeal is yet another order of the same d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g Officer erred in framing the second order of the same date which was prejudicial to the assessee in comparison to earlier order. We may point out that the conduct of the Assessing Officer was dignified and judicious and the CIT(A) rightly held that second order under appeal is bad in law. The CIT(A) was also quite balanced and justified in drawing attention of CIT, Meerut to this serious issue. We are unable to see any reason to interfere with the impugned order and we uphold the same on this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llate proceedings. 7. On careful consideration of rival submissions and vigilant perusal of the impugned order, we note that the assessee did not file any application under Rule 46A of the Rules seeking admission and consideration of any additional evidence. The so-called earlier assessment order was in fact a matter of revenue record which cannot be said to be additional evidence, thus ground no. 3 of the revenue being devoid of merits is dismissed. Ground no.4 of the revenue 8. Apropos ground .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

deration of above, at the outset, we note that the CIT(A) decided the issue in favour of the assessee with following findings:- 5.2 Decision and reasons therefor: I have perused the material on record. The assessment record shows that a notice under section 143(2) dated 27.9.2007 sent by speed post was returned unserved as per the noting of the postal staff dated 28.9.2007 on the envelope. Yet another notice of the same date is found on record which is shown as served by affixture by an ITI on 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

accepted the returned income, the A.O. has not mentioned the fact of service at all. In view of the circumstances of the proceedings, the valid service of notice within time comes under serious doubt. 11. In view of above, when the Assessing Officer himself went wrong in holding valid service of notice and did not decide the legal objection of the assessee, the CIT(A) was quite balanced and justified in holding that the valid service of notice within time comes under serious doubt as the Assessi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on sale and purchase transactions of shares was capital gain ignoring the frequency of the transactions of shares, its volume and continuity. Ld. DR supported the action of the Assessing Officer and placed his reliance on the various orders and judgements including judgment of Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs Sahara India Housing Corp. Ltd. (2012) 81 CCH 0063 (Del H.C.). 13. Ld. AR strongly supported the impugned order of CIT(A) and also placed reliance on the ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng conclusion:- 6.4. Decision and reasons therefor: I have carefully considered the reasons discussed by the A.O. in the impugned order for assessing the gain on the sale of shares as profits and gain of business as against Capital gains claimed by the assessee. The A.O. has observed in the Assessment order as under: a. During the year the Assessee has made 97 transactions of the sale and purchase of shares through Kotak Securities and 370 transactions through Alankit Assignments Ltd. b. In this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ain as claimed by the Assessee but a business Income. Thus, after going through the above observations of the AO it is quite obvious that he has converted the head of business in a very casual way and has not brought on record any concrete material for the view which he has taken in the assessment. I have also gone through the explanations and submissions of the AR. The assessee did not record the investments in his accounts by way of stock-in-trade. The assessee has declared the value of the sh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions Tax (STT). Even though the A.O. treated the appellant to be dealer in shares, AO did not allow the rebate u/s 88 E of the Act . In this factual back ground, I find that when the assessee could get benefit of valuation loss or rebate u/s 88 E , the A.O. did not regard the appellant to be a dealer in shares. I find also that the assessee s conduct all through was uniform. The assessee accounted for the investments in his books at cost and no valuation loss was accounted for by the assessee no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version