Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income Tax Officer Versus Sh. Arun Kumar

2015 (12) TMI 506 - ITAT DELHI

TDS u/s 194C - non-deduction of TDS on air freight charges - addition u/s 40(a)(ia) - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- The assessee made the payment on account of reimbursement of the air freight expenses and nothing was payable at the year end. Therefore, the disallowance made by the AO was rightly deleted by the ld. CIT(A). Similarly the disallowance on account of sea freight was wrongly made by the AO by invoking the provisions of Section 194C of the Act which were not applicable, si .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Sh. Kuldip Singh, JM For the Petitioner : Sh. O. P. Sapra, Adv. For the Respondent : Sh. K. K. Jaiswal, DR ORDER PER N. K. Saini, AM: This is an appeal by the department against the order dated 06.07.2012 of ld. ld. CIT(A), Meerut. 2. Following grounds have been raised in this appeal: 1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in facts and law in deleting the addition of ₹ 12,44,115/- made by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppeals) has erred in facts and law in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,87,912/- made by the AO u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act, 1961 for non making of TDS on sea freight which he was required to deduct as per provisions of section 194C of the IT Act, 1961 and payment made by the assessee squarely fell under the ambit of section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act, 1961. Reliance is again placed on the judicial pronouncement/circulars as mentioned in ground no. 1. 3. That the appellant craves leave to add, mod .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

running of hostel. He filed his return of income on 30.09.2009 declaring an income of ₹ 3,18,480/-. Later on, the case was selected for scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings the AO noticed that the assessee had debited air freight of ₹ 12,44,115/- and sea freight of ₹ 1,87,912/- totaling to ₹ 14,32,027/- in the trading account but no TDS was deducted on the said amounts. The AO asked the assessee to show cause as to why those expenses be not disallowed u/s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

imbursement of expenses to the cargo and TDS is not to be deducted on reimbursement of expenses as per Circular No. 715 dated 08.08.1995. Regarding this I am enclosing herewith a copy of bill of the party and cargo bill. In this bill cargo agent also charged service tax on the amount of their service charges and not on the whole bill amount i.e. Air freight plus service charges because it is reimbursement of expenses. So the TDS provision is applicable only the amount of their service charges an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

th. Regarding your query the non-deduction of TDS on Air Freight it is submitted that this expenses is of the nature of Reimbursement of expenses and TDS is not applicable on Reimbursement of expenses. Refer ITA No. 1335/Ahd/2010. Copy of case and copy of bills are enclosed herewith. It was also submitted as under: Regarding non deduction of TDS on Air freight and Ship freight the assessee has explained that as per the provisions of Sec. 197(2) of the Income Tax Act, in case of DTAA with consign .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is connection, respectful submissions of the appellant are as under:- 1. Provisions of section 194C were not applicable to air freight of R. 12,44,115/- and shipping charges (Sea Freight) of ₹ 1,87,912/-. This issue is covered by the order dated 10.03.2011 of ITAT Ahmadabad C Bench in the case of DCIT Vs Shri Hasmukh J. Patel, Prop. Jayshree Industries, Ankleshwar reported in 10 Taxman.com 229. Copy of this judgment is placed on record & relevant portion of is reproduced below:- The AO .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng but reimbursement of freight charges which was paid to the shipping agents for carrying materials for sale. Thus, the assessee made the payment to the shipping of non-resident through shipping agent. A special procedure is provided u/s 172 of the IT Act for payment of taxes in case of any ship belonging to or chartered by a non-resident which carries passenger, livestock, material or goods shipped at a port in India. It has nothing to do with the activity carried out by the assessee. The Boar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d any amount to the residents. Therefore, provisions of the section 194C of the IT Act have been wrongly applied in the case of the assessee. Copy of the above judgment was duly filed before the learned AO along with letters dated 28.11.2011 & 16.12.2011 including other judgments placed on record as also considered by him in para 1 at page 2 of assessment order. The learned AO is factually incorrect in making the following observation at page 5 para 1:- Thus, it is clear that where consolida .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

different issue. Merely not charging of Service Tax by agent on freight does not prove that the freight was in the nature of reimbursement because there is no such clear mentioning in freight invoice. Your kind attention is drawn to the following documents filed as under:- a) Bills issued by Movers International Pvt., Canin Express Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Nex Logistics India, online courier service New Delhi at page 38-107. b) Freight bills issued by Oman Air, Kuwait Airways, Gulf Air, Page 49-93. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on where freight was actually paid as reimbursement & separate bills for freight & service charges were issued by the agents. It is respectful submission of the appellant that the documentary evidence referred above placed at page 23-37 clearly proved that the payment made by the assessee was of reimbursement of freight. It is not necessary that separate bills for freight & service charges were to be make the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act. In the alternative without prejud .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT Vs Bhagwati Steels 326 ITR 108 (P&H) Merilyn Shipping & Transports Vs ACIT, Range Visakhapatnam (2012) 136 ITD 23 (SB) 8. The ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions of the assessee deleted the addition by observing that the payments made on account of air freight were actually reimbursement of expenses and that the assessee had filed plethora of material on record including the ledger of air freight reimbursement along with the copies of the agents bill and the carriers/airway .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Act were not applicable. Accordingly, the addition of ₹ 1,87,912/- was also deleted. 9. Now the department is in appeal. The ld. DR strongly supported the order of the AO and further submitted that the assessee was required to deduct the TDS u/s 194C of the Act on the payment made for the air freight. As regards to the payment for sea freight, it was stated that the deduction was to be made on the composite payment and not on the individual payment. 10. In his rival submissions the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed 16.12.2013 issued by the CBDT and reported in 360 ITR 36 (St) explained that the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act would not be applicable to the amount payable in State of Uttar Pradesh due to the judgment of the Hon ble Allahabad High Court. It was also contended that the issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Bench of the Tribunal in ITA No. 18/Del/2013 for the assessment year 2008-09 in the case of ITO, Ward- 27(1), New Delhi Vs Sh. Anoop Khandelwal, New Delhi (copy of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version