Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 532 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2015 (12) TMI 532 - CESTAT CHENNAI - 2016 (333) E.L.T. 327 (Tri. - Chennai) - Denial of exemption claim - imported parts for manufacture of hydraulic systems which are used in the windmills - Notification No. 12/12-CE dated 17/03/12 - Held that:- It is noticed that respondent being a manufacturer of hydraulic systems used in windmill, parts of the hydraulic systems used in wind mill was to generate non-conventional energy devices or systems. The goods characterized as 'non-conventional energy de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8 appended to that notification is exempt from levy of ACD. What is called systems is elaborated in sl.no.13 under list 8 to the notification. The systems are wind operated electricity generator with its components and parts thereof including rotor and wind turbine controller. This clearly throws light that not only a complete system is exempt but also the components and parts thereof are equally entitled to exempt from ACD. - Decided against Revenue. - C/41485 - 41486/2013 - Final Order Nos. 40 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

' (ACD) holding that the same is not leviable on imported parts for manufacture of hydraulic systems which are used in the windmills. It contends that ld. Commissioner (Appeals) committed an error to hold that appellants are covered by sl.no. 21 under list 8 to the Notification No. 12/12-CE dated 17/03/12. According to Revenue parts which are consumed if manufactured in the factory gets exemption. But imported parts are not exempt from ACD. 3. On the other hand, respondent submits that it is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ner (Appeals) also rightly held alternatively that appellant's goods attracts sl.no. 21 under list 8 to the said notification. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records. 5. There is nothing on record to show that the goods imported by the respondent were used elsewhere other than by specific use thereof in hydraulic systems used in windmills. There was no practical demonstration or testing of the goods imported done to rule out that respondent's case does not fall under sl.No.13 under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version