Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 716 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

2015 (12) TMI 716 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT - TMI - Imposition of penalty under Section 78 (5) - mens rea - Held that:- there is no requirement in law for Revenue to establish mens rea on the part of assessee in these penalty proceedings under Section 78 (5) of the Act - Present case is covered by the decision of this Court in various similar cases and one of such order passed in Assistant Comercial Taxes Officer, Ward-II, Circle-D, Jodhpur Vs. M/s.Nahar Granite P. Ltd., Jodhpur [2015 (11) TMI 1141 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peal against the appellate order passed by Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) dated 12.11.2010. 2. Both the learned counsels at the Bar submit that the present case is covered by the decision of this Court in various similar cases and one of such order dated 25.05.2015 passed in S.B. Civil (Sales-Tax) Revision Petition No.57/2008 - Assistant Comercial Taxes Officer, Ward-II, Circle-D, Jodhpur Vs. M/s.Nahar Granite P. Ltd., Jodhpur, has been produced before this Court. The relevant portion of the said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CTO Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (S.T.R. No.92/1999 along connection revisions, decided on 26.02.2015) reported in MANU/RH/0327/2015 , in which the Full Bench, headed by Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice, held as under:- "34. The suspicion or doubt on the documents to be false or forged, per se, does not attract levy of penalty under sub-section (5) of Section 78 of the RST Act, 1994. In such case, an opportunity is to be given under Rule 55 (1) of the RST Rules, 1995, to a person, to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpliance of the provisions of Act for the purposes of checking the evasion of tax. It is thus not correct to submit that penalty for submission of false or forged document or declaration, necessarily involves adjudication, for which mens rea is relevant, and is a necessary ingredient. Any doubts in this regard have been clarified by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Guljag Industries v. Commercial Taxes Officer (supra), in which it has been clearly held in para 30, after quoting the provisions of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iscussion, our answers to the questions referred, are as follows: - (i) The requirement of mens rea is not relevant for the purpose of determining the liability for penalty, in terms of Section 78 (5) of the RST Act, 1994. (ii)The mens rea is not required to be proved as necessary ingredient for imposition of penalty under sub-section (5) of section 78, on proving violation of sub-section (2) of Section 78 of the RST Act, 1994. (iii)The amendment of Rule 55 of the RST Rules, 1995, in pursuance t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version