Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Sandeep Bharat Versus The ACIT-12 (2) , Mumbai

Deemed dividend u/s. 2(22)(e) - Held that:- There is factual error in computing the deemed dividend. Surprisingly, there is no reference to the computation made by the assessee in the assessment order. In our considered opinion, without pointing out any flaw or error in the calculation made by the assessee, the AO should not have proceeded by calculating the deemed dividend of its own. Further, the AO has not given any basis as to how he has come to the accumulated profit of the respective compa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

OURT) has held that the “window for disallowance is indicated in Sec. 14A, and is only to the extent of disallowing “expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to the tax exempt income”. This proportion or portion of the tax exempt income surely cannot swallow the entire amount as has happened in this case.” Thus we direct the AO to restrict the disallowance to ₹ 2,62,194/-.- Decided in favour of assessee for assessee in part. - I.T.A. No. 8706/Mum/2011 - Dated:- 7-10-2015 - SHRI N.K .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,909/- and secondly on account of disallowance u/s. 14A r.w. Rule 8D amounting to ₹ 4,12,825/-. 2.1. The assessee is a proprietor of Nirmal Traders and is engaged in the business of General Commission Agents in yarn & fabrics. The assessee is also a share broker trading in shares & commodities. The return for the year was filed on 26.9.2008 declaring total income at ₹ 31,96,208/-. The returns were selected for scrutiny assessment. During the course of the scrutiny assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee was holding 30.39% of shares. 2.2. The AO was of the firm belief that the provisions of Sec. 2(22)(e) of the Act squarely apply on the facts of the case therefore the assessee was asked to explain why provisions of Sec. 2(22)(e) should not be applied. 2.3. The assessee filed a detailed reply claiming that the assessee has from time to time given loan to the companies on which the companies have paid interest to the assessee after deducting tax at source. In support, the assessee filed th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 1,27,71,834/-. In so far as M/s. Sumo Investment Pvt. Ltd., is concerned, the AO found that the said company has not shown income from money lending business as substantial part of its income, therefore the claim of the assessee that the said company is in money lending business does not hold any water. 3.1. Applying the provisions of Sec. 2(22)(e) of the Act, the AO computed the deemed dividend in the case of M/s. Sumo Investment Pvt. Ltd. at ₹ 73,10,000/- and in the case of M/s. P .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ebit balance of ₹ 5,166/-. Drawing our attention to the various transactions as exhibited in the accounts ledger, the Ld. Counsel stated that most of the time, it was the company which owed to the assessee, therefore it is incorrect to say that the assessee has borrowed ₹ 1,27,71,834/- from the said company. Same is the situation with M/s. Sumo Investment Pvt. Ltd. The Ld. Counsel further drew our attention to exhibit-24 of the Paper Book and stated that even the calculation of deeme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on to the orders of the authorities below. We have carefully gone through the relevant documents relied upon by the Ld. Counsel. Before proceeding further, let us understand the provisions of Sec. 2(22)(e) of the Act which read as under: any payment by a company, not being a company in which the public are substantially interested, of any sum (whether as representing a part of the assets of the company or otherwise) 24made after the 31st day of May, 1987, by way of advance or loan to a sharehold .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the extent to which the company in either case possesses accumulated profits; 8. A perusal of the aforementioned section clearly shows that the loan/advance to the shareholder can be treated as deemed dividend only to the extent to which the company possess accumulated profit. The computation of deemed dividend as per the working of the assessee as exhibited at page-24 of the Paper Book is as follows: Name of the party Amount Deemed Dividend Polyarn Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Loan Received Free rese .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

umulated profits. 1. Sumo Investment Pvt. Ltd., ₹ 73,10,000/- ₹ 73,10,000/- 2. Polyyarn Agencies Pvt. Ltd. ₹ 1,27,71,834/- ₹ 18,09,909/- 3. Deemed Dividend ₹ 91,19,909/- 10. Thus, it can be seen that there is factual error in computing the deemed dividend. Surprisingly, there is no reference to the computation made by the assessee in the assessment order. In our considered opinion, without pointing out any flaw or error in the calculation made by the assessee, the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r statistical purpose. 11. Ground No. 2 relates to the disallowance made u/s. 14A r.w. Rule 8D. 12. While scrutinizing the return of income, the AO found that the assessee has received dividend of ₹ 2,62,194/-. The AO noticed that the assessee has not allocated any expense for earning of the exempt income. The assessee was asked to explain why expense should not be allocated as per provisions of Sec. 14A r.w. Rule 8D. 12.1. The assessee claimed that no expenses have been incurred for earni .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version