Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 Versus Jyotindra International

2015 (12) TMI 911 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Expenses of stamp duty for pledge agreement and processing fees charged by the bank - revenue or capital expenditure - ITAT deleted the addition - Held that:- While deleting the addition it was noted that the expenses incurred towards pledge agreement with the bank was for borrowing working capital availed from bank and by incurring he expenditure no capital asset has come into existence. Before us no material has been placed on record by the Revenue to controvert the findings of CIT (A) and ITA .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nding labour charges and other expenses were not reflected. The Tribunal in particular confirmed the view of the CIT(A) that mere quantum of expenditure would not be sufficient to treat as capital expenditure, inter-alia, on such grounds - Decided against revenue

Machinery reconditioning charges of existing plant and machinery - expenses treated as capital expenditure - ITAT deleted the addition - Held that:- assessee contended that machinery had become old and without changing the co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

revenue - Tax Appeal No. 735 of 2015 - Dated:- 7-12-2015 - Akil Kureshi And Mohinder Pal, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Varun K Patel, Adv For the Respondent : Mr B S Soparkar, Adv ORDER ( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi ) 1. Tax Appeal is filed by the revenue raising following questions for our consideration. (i) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT has erred in law and on facts in confirming the order of CIT (A) deleting the addition of ₹ 2,60,700 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

apital expenditure? (iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT has erred in law and on facts in confirming the deletion of disallowance of ₹ 9,64,104/- made by the Assessing Officer after treating machinery reconditioning charges of existing plant and machinery as capital expenditure? (iv) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT has erred in law and on facts in deleting disallowance of ₹ 63,51,462/- made by the Assessing Of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version