Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Roshanlal Gupta And Sons Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And 2

2015 (12) TMI 931 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Waiver of pre-deposit - mandatory or not - Recovery of custom duty - Held that:- Since there was only one show cause notice which resulted into one order of adjudication passed by the Commissioner, we wonder whether the petitioner was even obliged to file a separate appeal. Insofar as the petitioner is concerned, it received one show cause notice and was visited with one final order of adjudication. Its liability, therefore, was to file a single appeal challenging such order of the Commissioner. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

angle. If by the time the petitioner presented the fresh appeal within the time permitted and directed by the Tribunal, the period of limitation had expired, would such appeal be rejected as time-barred.

It becomes clear that the amended section 129-E of the Customs Act with effect from 06.08.2014 would not apply to both the appeals of the petitioner which are pending before the Tribunal. The petitioner would, therefore, be governed by the original section 129-E as it prevailed prior .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Manisha Shah, Adv. JUDGMENT ( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi ) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner/assessee has challenged order dated 25.11.2014 as at Annexure-A to the petition passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ("the Tribunal" for short) in the following background. 2. The Department of Customs & Central Excise had issued a show cause notice against the petitioner which resulted into the order-in-original being passed b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lties under the Central Excise Act or the Customs Act. Upon perusal of appeal memo, it clearly emerges that the petitioner had filed one single consolidated appeal against the order of the adjudicating authority. His prayer was to quash and set aside the entire order. The grounds raised in the appeal were also directed against both kinds of duties and penalties. 3. The Tribunal, however, issued a memo on 24.07.2014 and raised a defect in such appeal which was specified as under: "One more C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t 1962 pertained to deposit, pending appeal, of duty and interest demanded or penalty levied. Prior to 06.08.2014, this provision read as under: "SEC. 129E. Deposit, pending appeal, of duty and interest demanded or penalty levied.- Where in any appeal under this Chapter, the decision or order appealed against relates to any duty and interest demanded in respect of goods which are not under the control of the customs authorities or any penalty levied under this Act, the person desirous of ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns as he or it may deem fit to impose so as to safeguard the interests of revenue : Provided further that where an application is filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) for dispensing with the deposit of duty and interest demanded or penalty levied under the first proviso, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall, where it is possible to do so, decide such application within thirty days from the date of its filing. " This section was amended with effect from 06.08.2014 and now reads as under: &quo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rder referred to in clause (a) of subsection (1) of section 129-A, unless the appellant has deposited seven and a half per cent of the duty, in case where duty or duty and penalty are in dispute, or penalty, where such penalty is in dispute, in pursuance of the decision or order appealed against; (iii) against the decision or order referred to clause (b) of subsection (1) of section 129-A, unless the appellant has deposited ten per cent of the duty, in case where duty or duty and penalty are in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

seen that, prior to 06.08.2014 it was open for an assessee to seek waiver of pre-deposit before the appellate authority or the Tribunal in its entirety. After the amendment on 06.08.2014, the statutory provision requires mandatory pre-deposit of 7.5% of the value of the duty, with or without penalty, as the case may be, leaving no discretion to the appellate authority to waive such requirement in order to entertain an appeal. 7. The view of the Tribunal is that, since the appeal filed by the pet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inuation of earlier appeal already filed long before section 129-E was amended with effect from 06.08.2014. Section 129-E makes it clear that the amended provision would not apply to any appeal or stay petition already pending when this section was amended. 9. On the other hand, learned counsel Ms.Manisha Shah for the Department opposed the petition contending that in clear terms the appeal or the pre-deposit waiver application was filed on 11.08.2014. Section 129-E as amended on 06.8.2014 would .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etitioner files a separate appeal under the Customs Act. The petitioner thereupon presented a fresh appeal on 11.08.2014 along with stay petition. 11. In our opinion, this presentation of fresh appeal by the petitioner before the Tribunal on 11.8.2014 must be viewed in the backgrounds of the facts of the case and must be treated as continuation of the original proceedings filed before the Tribunal instituted by the petitioner by presenting its original appeal on 21.7.2014. Since there was only o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version