Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

J.K. MITTAL Versus CPIO, M/O FINANCE, DEPT. OF REVENUE

2015 (4) TMI 1008 - Central Information Commission

RTI application - whether the respondents have provided the required information to the Complainant or not? - Held that:- As under Section 18(2) of the RTI Act, 2005, that there appears a reasonable ground to proceed further by making a proper inquiry in the matter. In view of this, the Commission feels that it would be appropriate and even justified to direct Shri Udai Singh Kumawat, Joint Secretary (Revenue), Department of Revenue, 46/North Block, New Delhi, to conduct an inquiry in the matter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d learned First Appellate Authority and/or CPIO along with the exhaustive inquiry reports and also the complete record of the case, to present the case on behalf of respondents, before proceeding under Section 18 read with 20 of the RTI Act, 2005. In case of failure, the Commission will be left with no option but to proceed u/s 18 read with Section 20 of the RTI Act, 2005 on the basis of record made available in the case file - File No. CIC/KY/C/2014/000312 - Dated:- 20-4-2015 - Shri M.A. Khan Y .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AA), Order is not on record. (V) Grounds for the complaint filed on 11-11-2014, are contained in the Memorandum of Complaint. Hearing Complainant as well as respondent appeared before the Commission personally and made the submissions at length. A written submission dated 20-4-2015 was also submitted on behalf of complainant. Decision It would be seen here that Shri J.K. Mittal, complainant, vide his complaint dated 11-11-2014 (copy enclosed), requested this Hon ble Commission as under : (A) Pas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h other order or directing as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and the circumstance of the case. 2. It is pertinent to mention here that the complainant, vide his RTI Application dated 26-12-2013 (copy enclosed), sought information from the respondents on eight issues as contained therein. Respondents vide their responses dated 2-1-2014, 8-1-2014 (copy enclosed), transferred the complainant s RTI application to the concerned Public Authority for taking necessary action. Further, D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to whether the respondents have provided the required information to the Complainant or not. On this very aspect, it is submitted by Ms. Himani Bhayana, that Complainant s RTI application dated 26-12-2013 does not pertain to her department but pertains to another Public Authority. However, Ms. Himani failed to point out the exact name and designation of concerned the Public Authority. 4. It is pertinent to mention here that most important criterion among the other criteria mentioned under S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version