New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1056 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (12) TMI 1056 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - 2016 (42) S.T.R. 686 (Tri. - Ahmd.) , 2016 (335) E.L.T. 153 (Tri. - Ahmd.) - Refund claim of accumulated CENVAT Credit - 100% EOU - export of services - period of limitation - Held that:- as notification 27/2012-CE (NT) dated 18.06.2012 specifically mentions that the time limit mentioned under Section 11B would be applicable for refund of CENVAT credit. The next factor to be considered would be the relevant date for computing the time-limit prescribed unde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Limited vs. CCE, Coimbatore read with the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CCE. & Cus., Surat vs. Swagat Synthetics (2008 (7) TMI 208 - HIGH COURT GUJARAT ) and the Tribunal decision in the case of Apotex Research Pvt. Limited and Others vs. Commissioner of Customs, CCE & ST, Bangalore (2015 (3) TMI 346 - CESTAT BANGALORE). - A careful and harmonious reading of these decisions would reveal that CENVAT credit though not a duty, by making Section 11B applicable to re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r authorities to the extent to hold that the refund claims filed within one year of export invoice would not be hit by the mischief of time-bar - Appeal disposed of. - Appeal No. : ST/13238,13239/2014 - ORDER No. A/11785-11786/2015 - Dated:- 4-12-2015 - Mr. P.M. Saleem, Member (Technical) For the Petitioner: Shri Omkar Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S.K. Shukla, Authorised Representative ORDER Per : Mr. P.M. Saleem The appellant herein has filed two appeals in respect of two Orders-i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ces. As they were exporting the entire services, they had not utilised the CENVAT credit availed. Therefore, they sought refund of the accumulated CENVAT credit. Revenue has rejected their claims on the grounds that the said claim were filed after the time-limit of one year prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The learned Counsel submits that the said time-limit is not applicable in the present case. His contention is that Section 11B is applicable only to the refunds of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

compilation. His alternate submission is that the relevant dates could be taken as the date of export invoice. He relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Apotex Research Pvt. Limited & others vs. CCE. & ST, CC Bangalore - 2014-TIOL-1836-CESTAT-BANG. 4. On the other hand, learned Authorised Representative for Revenue submits that the procedure for refund of CENVAT credit has been prescribed in Notification No. 27/2012-CE (NT) dated 18.06.2012, issued under Rule 5 of Cenva .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dit also. He relies upon the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of GTN Engineering (I) Limited vs. CCE, Coimbatore 2011-TIOL-1037-CESTAT-BANG. 5. On consideration of the arguments of both sides and careful perusal of the records, we find force in the arguments of the learned Authorised Representative for Revenue as notification 27/2012-CE (NT) dated 18.06.2012 specifically mentions that the time limit mentioned under Section 11B would be applicable for refund of CENVAT cre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version