Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1103 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (12) TMI 1103 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Denial of concessional rate of duty - Due to shortage of space, the appellant kept the imported materials partly adjacent to the factory premises - demand of cenvat credit alongwith interest and imposed penalty of equal amount - Held that:- Adjudicating Authority had observed that there was a procedural lapse of not applying to the Dy. Commissioner under Rules 8 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 for keeping waste paper in the go-down adjacent to the factor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

risdiction over the factory of the manufacturer. The proviso to Rule 8 states that, if such input is not used in the manner specified in the rules, the manufacturer of the final products shall pay an amount equal to the credit availed therein. In my considered view, the demand of cenvat credit would arise if the manufacturer fails to establish that the input in question was not used in the manufacture of final products. - impugned order is modified to the extent that the demand of Central Excise .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Das, Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. The appellant was engaged in the manufacture of Craft Paper classifiable under Chapter 48 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. During the period from 2006 to 2007 they received imported Waste Paper under concessional rate of duty for use in the manufacture of final product. Due to shortage of space, the appellant kept the imported materials partly adjacent to the factory premises. On 8th of August 2006, a fire occurred in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ral Excise and they have contravened the provisions of the Rule 8 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The appellant reversed the credit of ₹ 8,99,966/-in respect of the goods destroyed during the fire before issue of the show cause notice. The Adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of cenvat credit alongwith interest and imposed penalty of equal amount. The matter went upto the Tribunal. By order No S/273/WZB/AHD/2009, A/344/WZB/AHD/2009 dtd 20.1.2009, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its that they are contesting the demand of duty of ₹ 6,03,392/- alongwith interest and the penalties imposed under Section 11AC of the Act. He submits that the Adjudicating Authority demanded duty on the ground that the procedure under Rule under 8 of the Cenvat Credit Rule 2004 was not followed. It is submitted that proviso to Rule 8 clearly stated that the demand will be raised, if such input storage outside of the factory was not utilized in the final product. In the present case, it is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

had given intimation immediately as the fire occurred in the go-down. 5. On the other hand, the learned Authorised Representative on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). He submits that the appellants removed the duty paid inputs from their factory premises without the permission of the Dy Commissioner, Central Excise, which is violation of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules. So, they are bound to reverse the credit and therefore, the demand of cenvat cred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ural lapse of not applying to the Dy. Commissioner under Rules 8 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 for keeping waste paper in the go-down adjacent to the factory. It is further observed that, it is not a procedural lapse but, clear violation of the said Rules. The appellant is a Limited company in organized sector and they should have obtained proper permission to store the imported waste i.e., inputs, outside the factory premises. For the proper appreciation of the case, Rule 8 of the Cenvat Credit R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AT credit has been taken, outside such factory, subject to such limitations and conditions as he may specify: Provided that where such input is not used in the manner specified in these rules for any reason whatsoever, the manufacturer of the final products shall pay an amount equal to the credit availed in respect of such input. 7. On plain reading of Rule 8 of Cenvat Credit Rule 2004, it is clear that the assessee is entitled to storage of inputs outside the factory of the manufacturer, subjec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version