Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

State of Andhra Pradesh Versus Bharat Dynamics Limited

Misuse of C-Forms / D-Forms - disputed turnover relating to the manufacture and supply of missiles is sale or job work - majority of the bulk of material was purchased by the respondent by issuance of C-Forms and D-Forms and which material was got incorporated in the final product which were sold to Government of India and also the foreign buyer.

Held that:- Applying the ratio laid down by this Court in Bharat Dynamics Limited (1 supra) and in the absence of any material to come to a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e may also further add that the fact that ERDL, Pune, had issued D-Form for procuring material would go to show that they are eligible and entitled to issue such D-Forms and the D-Forms are validly issued. In that view of the matter, allowing the respondent to avail the concessional rate of duty, as applicable to the transaction, is unassailable.

We are also not persuaded by the argument of the learned counsel for the Department that on account of the alleged misuse of C-Forms, we ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- Decided against Revenue. - Tax Revision Case No. 87 of 2002 - Dated:- 28-7-2015 - G. Chandraiah And Challa Kodanda Ram, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Reddy, Special Government Pleader For the Respondent : Mr. S. Dwarakanath ORDER ( Per Hon ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah ) This tax revision, under Section 22(1) of the A.P.GST Act, is filed by the State against the orders of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in T.A.No.640/97, dated 31.12.2001, raising two questions of law said to be arising f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

present case is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the assessees own case i.e., State of Andhra Pradesh v. Bharat Dynamics Limited [1997] 106 STC 158 (AP) for the Assessment Years 1971-72 to 1977-78, and the Tribunal had followed the said judgment and as such there is no question of law to be decided and answered. However, Mr. Vivek Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the State, submits that there is a distinction which has been i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as purchased by the respondent by issuance of C-Forms and D-Forms and which material was got incorporated in the final product which were sold to Government of India and also the foreign buyer. The earlier judgment of this Court was rendered on the finding that the entire material was purchased for and on behalf of the Government of India and, as a matter of fact, it was only a job work; whereas, in the present case, the very fact that a bulk of material was purchased by the Assessee by issuance .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r sale or for re-sale is a clear indicator that the dealer obtained C-Forms for procuring material to be incorporated in the missiles which are to be sold. If it is to be contended that there are no sales and it is only for the purpose of executing the work contracts these bulk of materials were procured by utilizing C- Forms, the very utilization of C-Forms would amount to misuse and mis-utilisation of C-Forms, which is impermissible in law. It is also further contended that the respondent is b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rned counsel points out that the Tribunal had erred in allowing concessional rate of tax, notwithstanding the finding of the Assessing Officer that ERDL, Pune, was not eligible to utilize D-Forms. Learned counsel while submitting that the eligibility to get D-Form is only to an organization which is in trade and in that view of the matter the very fact that ERDL, Pune, is ineligible to get D-Forms would indicate that it is either a Corporation or an entity satisfying the conditions of a dealer; .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erring to various aspects which have been discussed by the Tribunal, the learned counsel prays for dismissal of the revision. 4. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the record. 5. At the outset, we may state that the scope of consideration of a tax revision case by the High Court, in exercise of powers under Section 22 of the A.P.GST Act as applicable to CST transactions, is limited to the consideration of questions of law that arise from the orders of the Tribunal. The Tribunal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d for the purpose of consideration of questions of law. This aspect of the matter is well settled by the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in Sudarshan Silks & Sarees v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka (2008) 12 SCC 458. 6. Keeping in view the parameters laid down by the Hon ble Supreme Court, we may examine the facts as found by the Tribunal. The Tribunal had elaborately considered every aspect of the matter and dealt with the issues. The Tribunal posed the following two questions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dia has entered into an agreement with a French entity for manufacture of certain guided missile systems and the necessary technology and support is being provided by the French entity. The said agreement is assigned in favour of the respondent. As a matter of fact, the entire of the manufacturing is done as per the instructions and to meet the requirements of Government of India and, at all times, entire of the raw material etc., are procured and held in trust, for and on behalf of the Governme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e component over the years. Considering the fact that the as per the basic agreement which was entered into between 1971 and 1972, it is natural that the local manufacturing abilities have been improved and efforts were made to absorb the technology so as to reduce the outflow of foreign exchange. For the relevant year, the Tribunal adverted to this aspect and, as a matter of fact, the Tribunal appears to have accepted the contention that the local purchase was only about 7% and 1% in two of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he material or of the product and thus came to a conclusion that procurement of certain parts of the material indigenously does not make any difference. 8. We had referred to the questions of law which have been raised above which does not indicate any question of law having been raised disputing these facts as found by the Tribunal. 9. In the facts of the present case, applying the ratio laid down by this Court in Bharat Dynamics Limited (1 supra) and in the absence of any material to come to a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version