Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI Versus M/s. PFIZER LTD.

2015 (12) TMI 1150 - SUPREME COURT

Classification - whether the Virginiamycin imported under brand name STAFAC 1000 is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 2941.90 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2941.90 or under Customs Tariff Heading 2309.90 and Central Excise Tariff Heading .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. In that case, the product was a premix, the additional items in the product were calcium carbonate, benzene, dextrose, lactose, yeast, soya flour etc. On the other hand, in the present case, imported goods Virginiamycin is a well defined chemical o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nue. - Civil Appeal Nos. 5858-5859/2007 - Dated:- 16-10-2015 - MR. A.K. SIKRI And MR. ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma, Adv., Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv., Mr. Rajiv Singh, Adv. And Mr. B. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.90 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2941.90 or under Customs Tariff Heading 2309.90 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2302.00. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'CESTAT') by impugned decision .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the Revenue. The contention of the appellant/Department in challenging the aforesaid findings of the CESTAT is that the said judgment in Tetragon Chemie Pvt. Ltd. is not applicable in the instant case. On the other hand, it is pointed out by Mr. K. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it is not premix animal feed under sub-Heading 2302.00. It is pointed out that this view has been taken in the case of the same assessee in 'Pfizer Ltd. v. Commissioner' [2005 (186) ELT A 117 (S.C.)]. We find substance in the aforesaid submis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version