New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1165 - CESTAT BANGALORE

2015 (12) TMI 1165 - CESTAT BANGALORE - 2015 (39) S.T.R. 468 (Tri. - Bang.) - Denial of rebate of Service Tax - no nexus between the input services and the exported output service - whether the appellant is eligible for the rebate of Service Tax paid at the time of export of their services under Notification No. 11/2005-S.T - Held that:- while considering the rebate claim for output service, the nexus issue cannot be raised. The only thing that can be considered is whether the tax has been paid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been rejected. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ST/1640/2011-SM - Final Order No. 20794/2015 - Dated:- 19-3-2015 - Shri B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T) Shri Shailendra Sukhlecha, CA, for the Appellant. Shri A.K. Nigam, Additional Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The issue involved is whether the appellant is eligible for the rebate of Service Tax paid at the time of export of their services under Notification No. 11/2005-S.T. Out of ₹ 20,15,886/- claimed by the appellant for March .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he decision is beyond the show cause notice. He also relies upon the paragraph 4.4 of a subsequent order passed by the very same Commissioner (Appeals) on the very same issue in respect of the very same appellant and submits that the Commissioner (Appeals) for the subsequent period has held that whether there was nexus between the input services and the output service is not relevant. 3. Learned AR on the other hand would submit that the show cause notice had required the appellants to show .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ioned in this notice or under any other law for the time being in force in India . He also submits that the appellants have not filed the copy of the rebate claim along with appeal memo and therefore the matter may be adjourned so that the copy of the rebate claim can be filed. 4. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides. As regards the first submission by the learned AR that the show cause notice required the appellant to produce the nature of input services, its usage etc. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version