Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Lords Chloro Alkali Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise (Jaipur-I) & Another.

Waiver of pre deposit - Section 35F - Held that:- One after the other three successive writ petitions were preferred by petitioner before the High Court of Delhi assailing the orders passed by the CESTAT and this fact cannot be ruled out that petitioner-company remained sick for a long time and became viable and started commercial production in February, 2015 and so also the fact that right of appeal which has been provided under the statute, ordinarily is not to be frustrated and in the present .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fore the CESTAT deserves to be restored and heard on merits. - petition is disposed of with the direction that if the petitioner now complies with the condition of pre-deposit in terms of the order of CESTAT dt.27.04.2006 on his application filed u/Sec.35F of the Act, be restored and the same be heard on merits. - Decided in favor of assessee. - D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.27/2009. - Dated:- 5-8-2015 - MR. AJAY RASTOGI AND MR. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr. S. S. Hora, Counse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earlier emerged during the production of Caustic Soda which could be used in the edible products like in solvex plants. It has been alleged in the petition that petitioner-Company was declared sick by BIFR vide order dt.15.01.2002. The scheme of its rehabilitation with reliefs and concession was sanctioned on 30.11.2006 by BIFR and during pendency of the writ petition on 26.03.2010 on company's net worth becoming viable it was deregistered by BIFR with direction to implement the provisions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for recovery of duty and imposition of penalty and after affording opportunity of hearing, the adjudicating authority vide its order dt.27.06.2005 confirmed the Excise Duty of ₹ 12,63,598/- along with the penalty of ₹ 1,00,000/-. The petitioner-Company being aggrieved by the order, in original, filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) which came to be rejected vide order dt.08.12.2005 and that came to be challenged in appeal before the Central Excise & Service Tax Appellat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

before 21.06.2006 failing which the appeal before the CESTAT will stand dismissed. 5. In all fairness, counsel for the petitioner submits that the jurisdiction to question the order of CESTAT lies before the Rajasthan High Court but on the ill advise extended to the petitioner, the order dt.27.04.2006 came to be challenged by filing of Writ Petition No.10553/2006 before the High Court of Delhi but before there could be any order passed on the writ petition filed before the High Court of Delhi, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pliance of the order dt.27.04.2006 on the last date of its compliance i.e. on 21.06.2006 and the earlier writ petition also came to be dismissed, the petitioner was advised to file a fresh writ petition before the High Court of Delhi being Writ Petition No.1097/2007 and that came to be dismissed as withdrawn on 13.03.2007 in view of the fact that question of law raised before the High Court of Delhi has already been raised before the CESTAT by filing of review/recalling application but to the di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e High Court of Delhi, objection was raised that in the light of judgment of the Apex Court in Ambica Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (213) ELT 323 (SC), jurisdiction lies with the Rajasthan High Court. Taking note thereof,the petitioner withdrew the writ petition with leave to approach the appropriate jurisdictional High Court and that liberty was granted to petitioner by the High Court of Delhi while dismissing the writ petition vide order dt.25.09.2007. 7. However, by filing three separat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

company for a long time and it has become viable in the recent past and started commercial production from February, 2015 and right of appeal is a statutory right provided under the Act has been denied to him only for the reason that he has failed to comply with the condition of pre-deposit in terms of order dt.27.04.2006 passed by the CESTAT and further submits that the statutory right of appeal, is not dependent upon compliance of pre-deposit, as contemplated u/Sec.35F of the Act and even if t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

] and submits that without going into merits the question which he has been raised in the instant petition, he has instructions from his client to inform that since the petitioner-company has now become viable and started commercial production, he needs liberty of this court that on complying with the conditions of pre-deposit in terms of order of CESTAT dt.27.04.2006, the appeal which he has preferred before CESTAT at least may be restored and heard on merits. 9. Per contra, counsel for respond .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version