Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s India Pistons Ltd. Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Company Circle-II (3) , Chennai

2015 (12) TMI 1242 - ITAT CHENNAI

Validity of reopening u/s.148 beyond 4 years - disallowance of royalty payment and recomputation u/s.80HHC - Held that:- Reopening is permitted only if the AO has the satisfaction that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment by reason of the failure on the part of the assessee to make a return u/s.139 or in response to a notice issued under sec.142(1) or sec.148 or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment, as held by the Madras High Court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Schwing Stetter India P. Ltd. (2015 (6) TMI 497 - MADRAS HIGH COURT ). The same view was fortified by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd. (2010 (1) TMI 11 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ). Being so, when the AO framed the original assessment u/s.143(3) of the Act after considering the materials on record and when there is no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) for the assessment year 1997-98. 2. The facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year 1997-98 on 28.11.1997, admitting an income of ₹ 12,52,65,750/-. The assessment was made u/s.143(3) on 2.3.2000 determining the income at ₹ 14,31,70,390/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened u/s.147 of the Act by issuing a notice u/s.148 of the Act on 15.3.2004 and assessment u/s.143(3) r.w. sec.147 was made on 9 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The Tribunal vide its order in ITA No.2837/Mds/2007 dated 17.4.2009 set aside the orders of the lower authorities. In view of the above directions of this Tribunal, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment u/s.143(3) r.w.sec.254 of the Act on 24.12.2010 assessing the income t ₹ 13,55,82,595/- by making (i) disallowance contribution to welfare funds, (ii) disallowance of royalty u/s.40(a)(i) and (iii) re-working the deduction u/s.80HHC of the Act. Against this order, the assessee wen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

purpose of assessment. Further, it was submitted that there is no finding in the reopening assessment that the assessee has failed to disclose all material facts fully and truly necessary for the purpose of assessment. According to him, reassessment is barred by limitation. Further, it was submitted that the Assessing Officer discussed the issue of allowability of royalty payment while framing the assessment u/s.143(3) of the Act. He drew our attention to paragraph 4 of the assessment order pas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t in favour of the assessee by observing that this expenditure is an admissible deduction while computing the business income of the assessee. Therefore, he submitted that there is no reason to reopen the assessment. The other two issues in dispute, were also considered by the Assessing Officer while completed the assessment u/s.143(3) originally. 6. On the other hand, the ld. DR submitted that where there is an assessable income for any of the assessment years and the same was not brought to ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

taxable income, or assessing the income at too low a rate, or granting of excessive relief, or granting/computation of excessive loss or depreciation allowance or any other allowance, if the return was already subjected to scrutiny assessment u/s.143(3). 6.1 The ld. DR further submitted that in the instant case, the assessee has debited certain amounts, by way of royalty payments, in its P&L account and claimed the same as allowable expenses. However the assessee has not deducted and or remi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee failed to exclude 90% of the non-business income while computing the deduction u/s.80HHC of the Act. Thus, there is an underassessment of taxable incomes on account of excess allowance of expenses, within the meaning of sec.147 of the Act. According to him, this is sufficient reason for re-opening the assessment u/s.147 of the Act. Therefore, the ld. DR submitted that after recording these reasons, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment u/s.147 of the Act, by issuing notice .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sent situation. 6.3 Further, the ld. DR submitted that when there is no discussion on the issue in the assessment order and no details were called for by the Assessing Officer or filed by the assessee on the issue, no finding either positive or negative was arrived at during the course of the original assessment proceedings, there is no question of change of opinion. To support his argument he relied on the following judgments: (i) A.L.A. Firm Vs CIT (102 ITR 622)(Mad), (ii) Ess Kay Engineering .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tt Builders (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT 98 ITD 78 (Kol). 7. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Admittedly, in this case, the original assessment was completed u/s.143(3) of the Act vide order dated 2.3.2000 and the AO considered the issue relating to royalty payment u/s.40(a)(i) and he also applied his mind with reference to deduction u/s.80HHC of the Act, for which reasons were recorded for reopening the assessment. Further, notice u/s.148 was issued on 15.3.2004 for the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version