Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1303 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2015 (12) TMI 1303 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - 2015 (326) E.L.T. 648 (Mad.) - Validity of Ex-parte decision of the tribunal to dismiss the appeal - CVD was paid utilizing DEPB Scrips - imported items were capital goods or not - Held that:- In a matter of this nature, where an ex parte decision has been rendered by the Tribunal, the prolongation of a decision on the same is not beneficial to either of the parties. After all, the appellant seeks an opportunity to appear before the Tribunal. It is not re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

013 and 25.9.2014 and the Tribunal rendered the decision. Therefore, we are of the considered view that one opportunity can be granted to the appellant, especially, in view of the fact that the benefit granted to the appellant by the Commissioner (Appeals) was confined only to one of the scrips, that was issued prior to the public notice issued by the DGFT. - Impugned order is set aside - Matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee. - CMA No. 2169 of 2015, MP No. 1 of 2015 - Dated:- 15- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oral Lithotripter and filed two bills of entry dated 30.6.2000. The goods were classified by the Department under tariff heading 9018.19. Two DEPB Scrips dated 31.8.1999 and 26.4.2000 were produced in accordance with the Customs Notification No.34/97. Further, the Director General of Foreign Trade issued a public notice on 7.4.2000, amending para 7.36B of the procedure to the effect that credit under DEPB may be utilised for payment of customs duty and on any item which is freely importable, exc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he CESTAT as against that portion of the order which held that the assessee is entitled to the benefit of DEPB scrips dated 31.8.1999. The appeal was filed way back in the year 2004. On 25.9.2014, the appeal was allowed ex parte on the ground that the assessee neither appeared nor filed an application for adjournment. Aggrieved by the ex parte decision so rendered by the CESTAT, the assessee is before us. 5. In the grounds of appeal, the appellant has indicated the sequence of events atleast fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Bench Sitting 8. No intimation 29.11.2011 No Bench Sitting 9. 02.01.2012 25.04.2012 No Bench Sitting 10. 19.07.2012 31.05.2012 No Bench Sitting 11. 03.09.2013 Adjournment sought by sending letter dated 13.08.13 12. 14.10.2013 24.12.2013 No Bench Sitting 13. No intimation 25.09.2014 Final order passed. 6. Mr.Haja Mohideen Gishti, learned Standing Counsel for the Department produced a copy of the mail received from the Department asking him to seek time for filing counter/further instructions from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version