Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Mr. N. Jegatheesan Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

When tax payable and when assessee deemed in default - powers under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) - validity of CBDT Instruction - Held that:- It is incorrect to state that DBDT Instruction No.1914, dated 02.12.1993 supersedes all previous instructions. Although instruction No.1914 specifically states that it is in supersession of earlier instructions, the position obtaining after the decision of the case in Volvoline Cummins Limited Vs. DCIT (2008 (5) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI ) is not altered at .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the business if such power was to be exercised only in a pro-revenue manner. Hence, the powers under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of IT Act have to be exercised in accordance with the letter and spirit of CBDT Instruction No.95 dated 21.08.1969, which is binding on all the assessing authorities created under the Act. - Therefore, the impugned order passed by the respondent without considering CBDT Instruction No.95, dated 21.08.1969 is against the principles laid down in the judgments stated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpugned orders are liable to be set aside. - The respondent is directed to consider the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 220(3) and 220(6) of IT Act, in conformity with CBDT Instruction No.95, dated 21.08.1969, by providing an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, and pass orders in accordance with law, as early as possible. - W. P. (MD). No. 10171 of 2015, M. P. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2015 - Dated:- 18-11-2015 - R. Subbaih, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. H. Naziradeen For the Resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dent to consider the petition filed under Section 220(3) and 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in conformity with the instructions of the Central Board of Direct Taxes by providing an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. 2. The brief facts, which are necessary to decide the issue involved in this writ petition, are as follows:- 2-1. The petitioner is an assessee of income tax, having permanent account No.ADWPJ 3312 K/1(2)/MDU with the status as 'individual'. Original return of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

11. Adding interest under Sections 234(B) and 234(C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, net tax to the tune of ₹ 78,150/- was paid under Section 140-A of the Income Tax Act,1961. However, notices under Section 143(2) dated 14.08.2013 and Section 142(1) dated 14.07.2014 of the Act 1961 were issued by the respondent to the petitioner under Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS), requiring the petitioner to produce the books of accounts. On receipt of notice, the petitioner appeared on the dates .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion cultivation of Jasmine and teak wood in Periakooda Kovil Village, Madurai District on a leased land from the petitioner's mother in Survey No.106 and 108 in an extent of 7.22 acres and to that effect evidences were produced by way of Patta, Adangal, Sales Bills and pesticides Bills and affidavit of petitioner's mother. Though necessary documents viz., Patta, Adangal in the name of the petitioner, Sale Bills, Pesticides Bills etc., were produced by the petitioner, the respondent/Asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent of 19-81 acres, in which Gloriosa Superba, Drumstick, and Coconut are cultivated by the petitioner as it is evident from Patta, Adangal, Lease Deed, Sale Bills, Payment of lease rent to one Mr.A.Balaguru. Even though the Bank Statement for above payments by cheques, Certificate of Deputy Director Horticulture regarding quantity of yield, VAO Certificate to the effect that the petitioner is cultivating the land, and pesticides Bills were produced by the petitioner, the respondent did not cons .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erified the above facts and accepted the extent of land owned and leased and crops cultivated thereon namely Jamine and Gloriosa Superba and passed orders dated 31.03.2014 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. However, for the assessment year 2012-2013, the respondent made high pitched assessment, by assessing the total income as ₹ 59,91,680/- and declined to accept the agricultural income of ₹ 45,00,000/- as well as ₹ 5,00,000/- each repaid to the petitioner's own br .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Income Tax (Appeals), the first appellate authority, to grant stay against the recovery of disputed demand. Hence, a petition under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of the Income Tax Act was filed by the petitioner on 29.04.2015 before the respondent seeking stay of recovery of demand amount. But, by way impugned orders the respondent disposed of the said petition filed under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, directing the petitioner to pay 50% of the demand amount, pending the ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pondent ought to have treated the petitioner as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute; on the other hand, the respondent in a usual manner simply passed an order dismissing the petition filed under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, without assigning any reason in a mechanical manner. Further, Instruction No.95 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes, dated 21.08.1969, is squarely applicable to the case of the petitioner. Hence, by taking into consideration the s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns were made rejecting the theory of agricultural income. The petitioner has referred the scrutiny assessment order for the Assessment year 2011-2012. Agricultural operations and income thereof varies from year to year and seasons to season. Therefore, reliance placed by the petitioner on the scrutiny assessment order for the Assessment year 2011-2012 is not relevant for the assessment year 2012-2013. Mere proof of ownership of agricultural land is not adequate. The burden of proving actual earn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oner/assessee has not explained how the balance of convenience is in favour of him, especially when he has not proved the agricultural operations. Merely because the petitioner/assessee has filed appeal before CIT (A), a blanket stay cannot be granted automatically. The respondent/Assessing Officer has a duty to collect the taxes as per the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961, CBDT Circulars and Principles laid down by Courts in various case laws. As such, merely because absolute stay was not gra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erations and the income derived thereof. The petitioner had requested for a blanket stay of entire demand merely on the ground that he has filed appeal against the additions; but no reasons explaining the genuine hardship faced by him in payment of the disputed taxes have been given in the petition under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the respondent sought for dismissal of the writ petition. 4. Heard the submissions made on either side and perused the materials availab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

00/-. After deducting rebate on agricultural income ₹ 40,80,000/- and adding education cess, the income tax was furnished by the petitoner as ₹ 96,309/-. The respondent/Assessing Officer severed notice on the petitioner requiring him the produce the books of accounts. The petitioner appeared before the respondent on the dates of hearing and produced necessary information and particulars. According to the the petitioner, without considering the explanations/informations, the responden .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax (Appeals) to grant stay against the recovery of disputed demand, the petitioner has filed a petition under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of the Income Tax Act before the respondent on 29.04.2015, for grant of stay of collection of tax amount, pending appeal. But, the respondent rejected the said petition and directed the petitioner to pay 50% of the demand amount, pending appeal. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted once the demand under Section 156 of IT Act, 1961 was issu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e appeal preferred by the petitioner within a period of six months. Now, pending the appeal, the impugned orders have been passed by the respondent directing the petitioner to pay 50% of the demand amount as per the CBDT Instruction No.1914, dated 02.12.1993 and to pay the balance amount after the disposal of the appeal. 8. Now, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the assessment made by the petitioner is a high pitched one, as per CBDT Instruction No.95, dat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

relevant facts of the case of the petitioner, the respondent/Assessing Officer has rejected the petition filed by the petitioner under Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of IT Act for stay of the demand, and directed the petitioner to pay 50% of the demand amount, pending the disposal of the appeal. 10. But, it is the assertive submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent is bound to grant stay by treating the petitioner as "not being in default in respect of the amou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the only question that has to be decided in this case is whether CBDT Instruction No.95, dated 21.08.1969 has been superseded by CBDT Instruction No.1914, dated 02.12.1993 and whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of stay of the recovery of demand amount, by treating him as "not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal", within the ambit of Sections 220(3) and 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 13. Before entering into the discussion, it would be appr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

46 (or Section 246A) the (Assessing) Officer may in his discretion and subject to such conditions as he may think fit to impose in the circumstances of the case, treat the assessee as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal, even though the time for payment was expired, as long as such appeal remains undisposed of." 14. It is stated that on receipt of notice under Section 156 of the IT Act, if the amount specified in the demand notice is not paid within the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t, subject to such conditions as he may think fit to impose the circumstances of the case. 15. But, so far as the case of the petitioner is concerned, it falls within the ambit of Sections 220(3) & 220(6), in view of the pendency of the appeal, in order to treat the petitioner/Assessee being not in default, to avoid penal/interest as well as granting absolute stay, since the assessment made by the Assessing Officer is high pitched assessment. "High Pitched Assessment" means where t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that is 01.04.2011 to 31.03.2012 for the assessment year 2012-2013 as ₹ 4,91,680/- including agricultural income of ₹ 45,00,000/-. But, the respondent having formed adverse opinion, as set out in the assessment order dated 31.3.2015, negativing agricultural income, made additions to the tune of ₹ 55,00,000/-. Thereby, adding admitted income of ₹ 4,91,680/- with addition of ₹ 55,00,000/-, the respondent arbitrarily without providing opportunity of cross-examination .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the petitioner is entitled for stay of recovery of the demand amount, as his case falls within the ambit of Sections 220(3) & 220(6) of the IT Act. In view of the pendency of the appeal, the respondent ought to have passed an order treating him as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal, by placing reliance on CBDT Instruction No.95 dated 21.08.1969. But, according to the respondent, the said CBDT Instruction No.95 was superseded and as such, the respondent has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urt has held as follows:- "8.Relying upon the said Instruction No. 1914 of 1993, Mr.Jolly submitted that all previous instructions stood superseded which included the supersession of said Instruction No.96. He further submitted that paragraph No.2(C), which deals with guidelines for staying demand, specifically requires that a demand be stayed only if there are valid reasons for doing so and that a mere filing of an appeal against the assessment order will not be a sufficient reason for sta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essing Officer and the TRO to collect every demand that has been raised "except the following', which includes "(d) demand stayed in accordance with the paras B and C below". Para B relates to stay petitions. As extracted above, Sub-clause (iii) of para B clearly indicates that a higher/superior authority could interfere with the decision of the Assessing Officer/TRO only in exceptional circumstances. The exceptional circumstances have been indicated as - "where the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d., (supra) that assessee's income was about eight (8) times the returned income. This Court was of the view that was high pitched. In the present case, the assessed income is approximately 74 times the returned income and obviously, this would fall within the expression "unreasonably high pitched". (Emphasis supplied)." A reading of the above dictum would show that if assessment order is unreasonably high pitched or genuine hardship is likely to be caused to the assessee, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

petitioner, hardship and also the interest Revenue. In the instant case there was an order of the court restraining the accountable person from alienating/disposing of the properties of the estate. The value of the estate which was determined by the authority was much more than twice the returned value. Hence, the Instruction No.96 of August 21, 1969, was applicable. It was also established that the accountable person had no cash belonging to the estate. A perusal of the order of the Tribunal in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.Balakrishnan and ors], the Bombay High Court has held as follows:- ".....Hence, we intend to lay down certain parameters which are required to be followed by the authorities in cases where a stay application is made by an assessee pending appeal to the first appellate authority. (a) While considering the stay application, the authority concerned will at least briefly set out the case of the assessee. (b) In cases where the assessed income under the impugned order far exceeds returned incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he authority wants the assessee to so deposit. (d) The authority concerned will also examine whether the time to prefer an appeal has expired. Generally, coercive measures may not be adopted during the period provided by the statute to go in appeal. However, if the authority concerned comes to the conclusion that the assessee is likely to defeat the demand, it may take recourse to coercive action for which brief reasons may be indicated in the order. (e) We clarify that if the authority concerne .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld abide by and being bound by the decision of the appellate authority, should normally wait for the fate of such appeal filed by the assessee. Therefore, his discretion of not treating the assessee in default, conferred under sub-section (6) should ordinarily be exercised in favour of assessee, unless the overriding and overwhelming reasons are there to reject the application of the assessee under Section 220(6) of the Act. The application under Section 220(6) of the Act cannot normally be reje .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee and miscarriage of justice & sometimes may even result into insolvency or closure of the business if such power was to be exercised only in a pro revenue manner. It may be like execution of death sentence, whereas the accused may get even acquittal from higher appellate forums or courts. Therefore, this Curt is of the opinion that such powers under subsection (6) of Section 220 of the Act also have to be exercised in accordance with the letter and spirit of Instruction No.95 dated 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

obtaining after the decision of the case in Volvoline Cummins Limited Vs. DCIT (2008) 307 ITR 103 (Del) is not altered at all. This is so, the DBDT Instruction No.95, dated 21.08.1969 was issued with the consent of the informal consultative committee held on 13th May, 1969 formed under the business rules of the Parliament, which even now holds the field. 18. Hence, I am of the opinion that the tendency of making high pitched assessments by the Assessing Officer is not unknown and it may result i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version