Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. SCL Infratech Ltd. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-6, Hyderabad

Rectification of mistake - disallowance made out of labour charges - Held that:- Even if the claim made by the assessee in the applications filed under S.154 that the disallowance made out of labour charges in both the years under consideration is not sustainable separately was disallowed by the Assessing Officer in the orders passed under S.154 on merit, the same by itself will not enlarge the scope of proceedings under S.154, which is confined to rectification of only the mistakes apparent fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and even the learned counsel for the assessee has not been able to dispute this position. We, therefore, find no infirmity in the impugned order of the learned CIT(A), upholding the orders passed by the Assessing Officer under S.154 for both the years under consideration whereby he rejected the rectification sought by the assessee on a debatable issue. Accordingly, the impugned order of the learned CIT(A) is upheld - Decided against assessee. - ITA No.1773/Hyd/2013, ITA No.1774/Hyd/2013 - Dated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation. 2. The assessee in the present case is a company which is engaged in construction activity mainly in specified irrigation projects. The return of income for assessment year 2008-09 was originally filed by the assessee on 17.9.2008 declaring total income of ₹ 8,74,91,700. A search and seizure action under S.132 was conducted in the case of the assessee company as well as its directors on 20.08.2009. Consequent to the said action, a notice under S.153A was issued by the Assessing Offi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

du, Managing Director of assessee company agreed to surrender undisclosed income of ₹ 4 crores in the hands of the assessee company as well as in his hands and in the hands of all other family members. Accordingly, undisclosed income of ₹ 2,89,91,100 was offered to tax in the hands of the individuals, and the balance amount of ₹ 1,10,08,900 was added by the Assessing Officer to the total income of the assessee company in the assessment made for assessment year 2009-10 under S.1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee for assessment year 2008-09 in the assessment completed under S.153A read with S.143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30.12.2011. 3. Subsequently on 23.1.2012, the assessee moved two applications under S.154 for assessment year 2008-09 and 2009- 10, claiming that the disallowance made out of labour expenses for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 should be telescoped in the undisclosed income of ₹ 1,10,08,900, added for assessment year 2009-10, and the same having not been done .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vouchers and the same having been agreed by the assessee, the claim of the assessee as made in the applications under S.154 that no separate disallowance out of labour expenses is called for, was not acceptable. Accordingly, the applications filed by the assessee under S.154 for both the years under consideration on this issue were rejected by the Assessing Officer vide two separate orders passed by him on 22.3.2102. 4. Against the orders passed by the Assessing Officer under S.154 for both the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the amount of ₹ 4-crores in the hands of his family members, company and himself. The appellant's plea that the disallowances may by the Assessing Officer in the assessment orders should be telescoped into the declaration made in the hands of the family members of the Directors/MD and also the company u/s. 154 of the IT Act cannot be accepted, since it is not a mistake apparent from record. Only an obvious mistake can be rectified {Grasim Industries Ltd. Vs. CIT (2009) 317 ITR 241(B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

seizure operation on the basis of incriminating material found and to be found and the disclosure was made in the names of various persons including the appellant company and adjusting the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer in the case of the' appellant company against the disclosure made in various names is not a mistake apparent from record. Therefore, the Assessing Officer's action in rejecting the application 154 of IT Act on this issue is justified and hence is confirmed. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Manpower Service provider

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 08/2017-IT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services.

News: Tax on fuel more important for a dry state like Gujarat

Highlight: For an ayurvedic medicine to be classified under Chapter 30 has to pass the test whether it is for cure of any disease. If the same is only meant for care, then such product would not fall under medicament.

Highlight: Demand of interest - the period of limitation that applies to a claim for the principal amount should also apply to the claim of interest thereon.

Highlight: Government issues new notifications under CGST, IGST and UTGST to grant fresh exemptions in respect of certain supplies.

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

Forum: Construction of single unit bungalow

Article: SIMPLIFIED E-WAY BILL UNDER GST

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version