Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

C.C.E. & S.T. Rohtak Versus M/s. Ridhi Sidhi Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Issue of invoices without actual receipt of goods - Held that:- as the respondent has made all the payments through account payee cheque to the first stage dealer who has accepted that they have delivered the goods along with invoices. Moreover, no statement of transporter have been recorded to ascertain the fact that respondent has not received the goods. In these circumstances, I do not find any infirmity with the impugned order on merits. Further, I find that in this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er Ashok Jindal: The Revenue is in appeal against the order wherein the Ld. Commissioner (A) has set aside the order of adjudication denying Cenvat Credit to the respondent. 2. The facts of the case are that the respondent procured goods during the period 11.08.2006 - 20.09.2006 from M/s Jay Shree Enterprises, first stage dealer who ultimately procured the goods from M/s. AIP Industries Ludhiana and some proceedings were initiated against M/s. AIP Industries and a show cause notice was issued to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AIP Industries have issued cenvitable invoices to avail inadmissible Cenvat Credit by the respondent without delivering the goods. Both the parties namely respondent and M/s Jay Shree Enterprises contested the issue before the Adjudicating Authority saying that we have physically received the goods and all the payments have been made through account payee cheque. No investigation has been conducted with the transporter of the goods. Therefore, it cannot be alleged that the first stage dealer as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

redit on the premises of the invoices issued by M/s. AIP Industries. He also dropped the penalties against Shri Satish Garg, Director and M/s Jay Shree Enterprises. The revenue has not challenged order qua Shri Satish Garg and M/s Jay Shree Enterprises is before me. Revenue is in appeal only against the respondent before me. 4. The Ld. AR submits that in this case M/s. AIP Industries is not having the facility of manufacturing of impugned goods. Therefore, question of delivering the goods does n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t Cenvat Credit is not available to the respondent without proving with cogent evidence. He further submits that M/s. AIP Industries appeal has been dismissed by this Tribunal for non compliance of the provision under section 35F of Central Excise Act 1984. He further submits that for appeals against Mr. Satish Garg and M/s Jay Shree Enterprises he wants to seek report from the concerned department whether they have filed the appeal or not. 5. On the other hand Ld. Counsel for the respondent sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t and payment to M/s Jay Shree Enterprises has been made by the respondent through A/c payee cheque only. Moreover, mode of transportation have been mentioned in the invoice. No investigation has been done by the revenue to allege the respondent has not received the goods from M/s Jay Shree Enterprises. As per Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 the assessee is required to see the name of the manufacturer supplier duty being paid on the goods and same has been transported in proper way to the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue is not applicable to the facts of this case. 6. Heard the parties. Considered the submission. 7. The main allegation of the Revenue is that as M/s. AIP Industries is not having manufacture facility, therefore, Cenvat Credit is not available to the Respondent. To support his contention Ld. AR heavily relied on the decision in the case of Harsaran Dass Sita Ram (Supra). In the said case in earlier round of proceedings after examining the facts of the case this Tribunal came to the conclusion th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt as in the impugned order itself Ld. Commissioner (A) has come to the conclusion that respondent has been able to prove that they have received the goods in their premises. Therefore, the said facts are not applicable to the facts of this case. Further, I have examined the impugned order and in the impugned order Ld. Commissioner (A) has observed as under: As regrds, appellant no.1 the representative of the appellant during the investigation categorically submitted that they have received the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessment order from the sales tax department, copies of declaration inform-H and the statements of bank accounts to substantiate their claim that they have received the goods from appellant no.2. All these were verifiable facts. The department has not conducted any investigation whatsoever on the factual statements made by the appellant no.1. They have not been commented upon in the order-in-original neither there is any rebuttal. Therefore, the existences of these documents and the transaction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version