Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 976 - CESTAT BANGALORE

2015 (5) TMI 976 - CESTAT BANGALORE - 2015 (325) E.L.T. 894 (Tri. - Bang.) - Denial of exemption claim - appellant’s claim for the benefit of Notification No.115/75 as amended which exempts goods manufactured in a factory coming under the category of oil mill or solvent extraction industry - Job work - prescribed procedure not followed - Held that:- Prescribed procedure under Notification No.214/86 was not followed and therefore RRRL or the appellant is liable to pay duty. The Commissioner also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

traction industry’. The decisions also support the claim that even if a factory is engaged only in refining, it would be still covered by the terms used in the notification. That being the position, the appellant is clearly eligible for the benefit of Notification No.115/75 CE as amended. It has to be noted that the decisions applied to the situation prior to amalgamation as well as after amalgamation. This is because in the case of Prakash Solvex (2008 (1) TMI 328 - CESTAT NEW DELHI), the Tribu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Dr. A.K. Nigam, Addl. Commissioner(AR) ORDER Per : B.S.V. MURTHY The appellant is engaged in the manufacturing of refined rice bran oil falling under Chapter 15 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Even though the impugned order was passed against M/s. R.R. Refineries Ltd. (RRRL for short), since RRRL has been amalgamated with the appellant, the appellants are pursuing the matter before us. Before amalgamation, the appellant in their factory premises were crushing oil seeds / .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nvestigations were commenced in May 2004. As a result of which, proceedings were initiated which has culminated in confirmation of demand for Central Excise duty of ₹ 1,40,97,966/- for the period from June 2001 to February 2006. Penalty under Section 11AC also was imposed. 2. In the impugned order, it has been held that the prescribed procedure under Notification No.214/86 was not followed and therefore RRRL or the appellant is liable to pay duty. The Commissioner also considered the appel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n in the case of Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE [1997(91) ELT 538 (SC)] to submit that they are eligible for the benefit of Notification No.115/75. 4. Notification No.115/75 as amended exempts goods manufactured in oil mill and solvent extraction industry. The Honble Supreme Court after considering the submissions in paragraph 3 observed as follows:- 3. The said notification exempts goods manufactured in factories covered by the industries specified in the Schedule. Item 4 of the Schedule s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ods manufactured in a solvent extraction plant and must, on the plain words of the notification, receive the benefit of the exemption that it confers. 5. In the present case, exemption has been denied on the ground that before amalgamation or after amalgamation of RRRL and the appellant, the two factories were separate. One factory extracted oil and the other factory refined it. After 2002 after amalgamation, the two factories belonged to the same appellant. 6. Further the learned counsel also r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to Oil mill and solvent extraction industry which suggests that any goods manufactured in a factory which may qualify as Oil Mill Solvent Extraction Industry , is entitled to exemption. In this view of the matter, the fact that the appellant purchased crude oil and by subjecting the same to refining process manufactured oil is immaterial. As observed in the case of A.P. Solvex Ltd. v. CCE, Ludhiana (supra), in the absence of any such condition or stipulation therein, the benefit of exemption wil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version