Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

K Nithyananda Pai And Sooryakala Versus Commissioner of Customs, Cochin

2015 (12) TMI 1437 - CESTAT BANGALORE

Confiscation of goods - Non declaration of goods - Held that:- There is no rational, sound reason and any redeeming factor giving scope to reduce the penalties imposed on these appellants. The matter is quite serious when the restricted items like 49 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppellants office; though invoices were submitted by the other person but the office owned by Shri K. Nithyananda Pai, the appellant was allowed to be used. Consequently both these appeals are dismissed and disposed of as having no substance and reaso .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed:- 13-8-2015 - Shri Ashok Kumar Arya, Technical Member For the Petitioner : Mr. V.S. PREJITH, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. PAKSHI RAJAN, A.R. ORDER Per : Ashok K. Arya These two appeals have come up for hearing of the stay petition. However, as the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Customs (Appeals), Cochin, whereunder on both the appellants a penalty of ₹ 25,000/- each has been imposed. 3. This is a case where appellant namely Ms. Suryakala allowed her IE code given under the name of M/s Premier Exports (where she is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly valued at US$ 13442.81 and the same were not declared and found concealed in the cartons containing TV stands and light fittings; these items being without any arms license and import permission were liable to confiscation under Customs Act read w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ryakala let her IE code to be used by the importer for importing the impugned goods which are restricted items. The appellant Ms. Suryakala also counter-signed the purchase orders submitted to Customs. 5. The learned advocate for these two appellants .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad with Arms Act and/or under Foreign Trade Policy. The learned advocate also says that the main importer namely Mr. Koya has given in his statement that liability for importation of impugned goods is with him and not with these two appellants. 6. Le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version