TMI Blog2015 (5) TMI 985X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not be said that in this case penalty cannot be reduced, therefore, following the precedent decision, in the case of Adhunik Steel Ltd. and M/s. Tata Steel [2015 (12) TMI 1053 - CESTAT NEW DELHI], the penalty on the appellant is reduced - Decided partly in favor of appellants. - Excise Appeal No. 51930, 54436,54437,54439 & 54551 of 2014- (SM) - FINAL ORDER NO. A/ 51713-51717/2015-(SM) - Dated: ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... penalties have been imposed on the appellant from same investigation, therefore, penalty be reduced as in those case the penalties were reduced. 2. On the other hand, learned AR objected to the contention of the learned Counsel and submits that in the case of Ragini Steels(P) Ltd. {[2015] 56 taxman.com 324 (P H)}, the Hon ble High Court has held that Tribunal cannot observing that pen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Penalty E/51930/2014 Rs.11,000/- E/54436/2014 Rs.24,000/- E/54437/2014 ₹ 8,500/- E/54439/2014 Rs.27,000/- E/54551/2014 Rs.6,000/- 4.Ordered accordingly. Appeals are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|