Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Clariant Chemicals (India) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I

2016 (1) TMI 57 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Confiscation of goods where the duty has been set aside on the ground of period of limitation - Held that:- if the entire duty liability has been set aside, confiscation of the goods which are seized from the appellant's premises, does not stand good .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le to confiscation. - Decided in favor of assessee. - Appeal No. E/308/2007 - Final Order No. A/3783/2015-WZB/EB - Dated:- 4-11-2015 - M V Ravindran, Member (J) And C J Mathew, Member (T) For the Appellant : Ms Shilpi Jain, Adv For the Respondent : S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The issue involved in this case is regarding redemption fine imposed of ₹ 2.25 lakhs on the appellant herein in respect of the various purchases made by them of furnitures from M/s Interscape. The adjudicating authority has confiscated the sei .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and installed in the factory/office premises of the appellant holding that few of this would amount to manufacture and as such M/s Interscape was issued a show cause notice along with show cause notice to the appellant herein directing them to show .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penalties. The very same order-in-original, which is before us, was challenged by M/s Interscape before the Tribunal in appeal No. E/311 to 314/2007. The said appeals were allowed by the bench by final order No. A/3007-3010/15/EB dated 08/09/2015 hol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the impugned orders in so far as it pertains to demands for the period prior to March 1995 are not sustainable on limitation. These demands are set aside on limitation. 6.6 ………. 7. Since the demands have not been found to be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version