GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 62 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (1) TMI 62 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Duty demand - shortages in inputs received and goods which are part of work in progress - Held that:- They are contesting the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in paras 6.1 and 7 of the impugned order. We find that apart from arriving at contradictory findings regarding work-in-progress, the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to consider the explanation offered by the assessee about the accounting process and clearance of all production to 100% EOU. No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

castings has been evidenced, he upheld demand of duty on castings without any reasoning. His finding that cenvat credit available on ingots is to be reversed is without any basis and, in any case, the final confirmation of demand of duty on castings using such finding is totally misplaced. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Excise Appeal No. E/2850/2006-EX(DB), Excise Appeal No. E/3880/2006-EX(DB) - Dated:- 23-10-2015 - Sulekha Beevi CS, Member (J) And B. Ravichandran, Member (T) For the Appell .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cleared to sister unit and wrong availment of credit on tubes as inputs instead of capital goods were also noticed. Proceedings initiated resulted in the order dated 19.11.2005 of Joint Commissioner. On appeal, the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order confirmed part of the demand and set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee. 3. The assessee is in appeal contesting the demand as upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). Revenue is in appeal against dropping of penalty. 4. Ld. Couns .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

same order he held regarding work in progress, that demand is to be confirmed to the extent of cenvat credit available on aluminium ingots and not on aluminium castings. He accordingly confirmed demand of ₹ 4,27,092/- with equal penalty. The ld. Counsel points out that this amount is actually duty demanded on castings as calculated in para 1 (d) of show cause notice dated 1.7.2005. Such demand, he submitted, is against Commissioner (Appeals) own finding that demand can not be made on cast .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lone will not make the asesseee escape, from the penal liability for contravention of legal provisions. 6. We have heard both the sides and perused appeal records. To consider assessee's appeal first, we find that they are contesting the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in paras 6.1 and 7 of the impugned order. We find that apart from arriving at contradictory findings regarding work-in-progress, the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to consider the explanation offered by the assessee abou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version