Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The DCIT, Ahmedabad Versus Gujarat Gas Financial Services Ltd.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Reopening of assessment - lower appellate order deleting depreciation disallowance - Held that:- A perusal of the case file reveals that the installation report of this asset. Page 41 of the paper book reveals lease rent income therefrom in assessee’s P & L account. Page 43 is sales tax challan of the asset. It transpires from the case file that this Kanpur entity went into liquidation. The assessee filed company application before hon’ble Allahbad high court for inspecti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

He sought time to produce the search inventory. The same stands submitted in the courses of hearing. Page 53 thereof reveals that the very air pollution control equipment was found during the course of search. We observe on the basis of these facts and evidence that the assessee has been able to prove genuineness of its depreciation claim qua the air pollution control equipment in question leased out to M/s Rajendra Steels Ltd, Kanpur. The Revenue’s argument accordingly are declined.

.....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ition does not survive. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 3465/Ahd/2004, ITA No.3386/Ahd/2004, ITA No.2342/Ahd/2006, ITA No.3416/Ahd/2008 - Dated:- 30-11-2015 - Pramod Kumar, AM And S. S. Godara, JM For the Appellant : Shri R K Gupta, Sr. DR For the Respondent : Shri S N Soparkar, AR ORDER Per S. S. Godara, Judicial Member This is a batch of four appeals. The assessee and Revenue have filed quantum appeals in Assessment Year 1996-97 against CIT(A) s order dated 27-09-2004 in ITAs 3386 & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssment year 1996-97 involves three appeals i.e. quantum cross appeals filed at assessee and Revenue s behest ITAs 3386 and 3465/Ahd/2004. This is followed by assessee s appeal in consequential penalty proceedings bearing ITA no. 3416/Ahd/2008. We take first of all above stated quantum cross appeals. 3. The assessee in its appeal 3386/Ahd/2004 raises solitary ground of depreciation of ₹ 1,71,92,701/- on assets sold and leased back. The CIT(A) relies upon tribunal s special bench decision in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

npur. 4. The assessee-company is in the business of leasing and hire purchase with trading in shares and other investments. It filed its return admitting income of ₹ 61,11,200/- along with audit report, balance sheet and P & L account. The Assessing Officer completed a regular assessment on 24-03-1999 determining the same very income. Thereafter, he formed reasons to believe that assessee s income liable to be assessed had escaped assessment. He accordingly issued section 148 notice da .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ither did not exist or the real worth of these machinery was only 10% to 20% of the value recorded in the books. In this way, the assessee has claimed bogus depreciation on non-existent machinery. Since the above amount of income has appears to be escaped from taxable income for A.Y. 1996-97, it is mandatory to issue notice u/s. 148 of the I.T. Act to cover the above income and tax the same. Accordingly, a notice u/s. 148 is therefore issued to the assessee for this purpose." 5. The Assessi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case of M/s. Rajendra Group of Companies, Kanpur. There is no dispute that exact depreciation claim figure is ₹ 38,28,244/- @ 50% of the latter figure. The remaining depreciation claim is of ₹ 1,71,96,071/- hereinabove. 6. The assessee preferred appeal inter alia raising four substantive grounds challenging validity of reopening as well as correctness of the above stated disallowances on merits. The CIT(A) upholds the Assessing Officer s action on legal ground and qua depreciation cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in lower appellate proceedings that all disallowances hereinabove have to be deleted since impugned reopening itself is not sustainable in view of the fact that the sole reason recorded resulting in corresponding disallowance stands deleted. The CIT(A) declines the same by observing that the Assessing Officer is very much competent in the courses of reassessment to open any claim not correctly worked out earlier in regular assessment. This backdrop of facts leaves both parties aggrieved to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct, the entire reopening deserves to be quashed. Case law of CIT vs. Mohmed Juned Dudani (2014) 355 ITR 172 (Guj), CIT vs. Living Media India Ltd (2013) 35 taxmann.com 105 (Del), Asha Kanshal Vs. ITO Agra (2014) 62 SOT 146 (Agra) and that of Amritsar bench of the tribunal in ITA No.222/ASR/2014 decided on 11-06-2015 is quoted in support. The Revenue s arguments strongly back the lower appellate findings under challenge qua this issue. 8. We have heard rival contentions. There is no dispute that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

upra). The CIT(A) has revered Assessing Officer s action on the issues of depreciation claim of ₹ 38,44,244/- and loss hereinabove. The question that arises for our consideration in these circumstances is as to whether the entire reopening has to be quashed on assessee s legal plea in case we affirm CIT(A) s findings on the sole reason of reopening on merits or not. We seek guidance from the above stated case law in deciding this question. The hon ble jurisdictional high court in Dudani ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; C later on. This A ground was the issue of bad debts. The Assessing Officer disallowed/added various amounts under all of these grounds. The CIT(A) deleted the one pertaining to bad debts. Both assessee and Revenue filed cross appeals before the tribunal. A co-ordinate bench therein affirmed CIT(A) s order in Revenue s appeal and reversed the corresponding findings on B & C grounds hereinabove. The Revenue filed appeal before the hon ble Delhi high court against the tribunal s order qua B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial precedents. The Assessing Officer reopened assessment on the issue of capital gains of ₹ 3,98,950/-. He added the same along with two other heads of ₹ 3,98,593/- and ₹ 3,97,955/-. The CIT(A) deleted the first addition forming sole reason of reopening. The assessee preferred appeal. The Revenue did not challenge the CIT(A) s order therein qua the first addition. The ld. co-ordinate bench in these facts and circumstances quashes reopening by quoting case law of CIT vs. Jet Ai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Amritsar bench of the tribunal (supra). The Assessing Officer in said case reopened assessment alleging assessee s loan repayment in favour of outgoing partners of a dissolved firm to be more than his income. He framed reassessment making additions under various other heads as well. The assessee preferred appeal challenging legality of reopening as well correctness of all additions. The CIT(A) inter alia rejected legal ground, deleted addition forming subject matter of reopening reasons a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee to object to reopening reason at the very first stage or during reassessment. It propagates assessing authority s dual adjudication accordingly as under:- "14. There cannot possibly be any two opinions with regard to the enunciation of law by Their Lordships in Majinder Singh Kang's case (supra). However, we find that the reliance by the learned Departmental Representative on this decision, on the facts of this case, to be inapt. In Majinder Singh Kang's case, Their Lordships .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

en shown to have altered, even sub silientio, the well settled legal position that the validity of reassessment proceedings is a sine qua non for any additions being made to the income of the assessee, during the course of the reassessment proceedings-whether in respect of the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment or in respect of the reasons other than the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment. 15. Moreover, particularly in the light of the scheme of law as visualized by Hon' .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

proceedings and after he has issued notice for reopening the assessment. In a situation in which the assessee can convince the Assessing Officer that these reasons are not good enough to make the additions, the reassessment proceedings are to be dropped anyway. 17. There is no bar on the nature of material that the assessee may seek to rely upon, even at the first stage, to demonstrate that the reasons for reopening are unsustainable in law and even this adjudication by the Assessing Officer is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e other at the point of time when, during the reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer has to take a call on additions to be made in respect of these reasons. That is where there is a paradigm shift in the scheme of things post GKN Drivershaft decision. In a situation in which, during the reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer finds these reasons to be so incorrect that he concludes that no income has escaped the assessment and the additions on that count are unwarranted, the sam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at no additions can be made on the basis of the reasons of reopening, as recorded by him, he has to drop the reassessment proceedings at this initial stage itself. When the examination of correctness of the reasons recorded come up for adjudication before the appellate authorities, the approach, therefore, cannot be any different, either. 18. In the case before Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court, as evident from the extracts from the CIT(A)'s order reproduced therein, the reassessment was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Lordships made clear in no uncertain words. The correctness of the reasons of reopening was not an issue before Their Lordships. The correctness of the reasons for reopening was not, directly or indirectly, in challenge. 19. As is evident from the discussions earlier in this order, here is a case in which the very reasons on account of which the CIT(A) has deleted the quantum additions were also good enough to hold that the initiation of reassessment proceedings is bad in law and yet the CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dispute before us. If such be the facts, there can be no justification for taking these findings to its logical conclusions and, based on these uncontroverted findings, quash the reassessment itself. What held good for deleting the additions on the basis of the reasons recorded the assessment, on the fact of this case and in our humble understanding, was good enough to hold the reasons for reopening the assessment to be incorrect as well. We are unable to see any legally sustainable reasons to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

en held that entire reopening as well as other additions not forming reopening reasons are not sustainable in the eyes of law in view of the fact that the one based on which reopening itself was initiated stands deleted. We revert back to facts of the instant case before us. A slight variation is noticed since the Revenue is already in appeal qua the sole reason of reopening on depreciation issue. We hold in these facts and circumstances that if lower appellate order on this issue alone is ultim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the CIT(A) s action in deleting depreciation disallowance of ₹ 38,24,344/- on air pollution control equipment purchased and leased back to M/s. Rajendra Steels, Kanpur forming sole reason of reopening. The lower appellate findings decide the issue in assessee s favour as follows:- "Ground No. 3 : This relates to depreciation claim of ₹ 38,24,344/- in respect of assets leased to M/s. Rajendra Steels Ltd., Kanpur by the appellant. This has been discussed by the AO in para 3 page .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d above. The assessment is also reopened primarily on account of non-existence of the said assets as per physical inventory prepared at the premises of Rajendra Steels Ltd. during the course of search u/s. 132 at Kanpur by DDIT (Inv) Unit-2. This has been referred in the reasons recorded for reopening in the opening paragraphs. The AO has rejected the claim as per para 3.1 of the order giving the following reasons. "3.1 I have carefully considered the reply of the assesses company and found .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the contents of the letter dated 4.2.2002 and 19.3.2002 and also the evidences produced before the AO during reassessment proceedings. The same have been reiterated in the course of hearing. It is pleaded that the said concern M/s. Rajendra Steels Limited has since gone into liquidation and the appellant company alongwith 18 other companies have taken up the matter before the High Court of Allahabad for winding up of the company. It has also been prayed as per the said petition No. Company Appli .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stallation at the premises of Rajendra Steels Ltd. The lease agreement was also submitted as per Armexure-4 to letter dated 4.2.2002 and a certificate from various persons of Rajendra Steels Limited was also submitted as per Annexure-2 to letter dated 4.2.2002. I have carefully perused the submissions and also the case laws narrated and cited by the appellant's representative and find that the AO has not given any finding on the issues raised, namely, the actual purchase of the assets and su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the above assets and direct the AO to accordingly allow the same for the respective period." 11. We have given our thoughtful consideration to rival arguments. The Revenue s contention is that it had carried out a search in case of Kanpur entity which did not reveal any such asset subject matter of the impugned depreciation claim. A perusal of the case file reveals that page 40 is the installation report of this asset. Page 41 of the paper book reveals lease rent income therefrom in asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssary directions to the official liquidator. He issued intimation to assessee on 08-01-2003 appointing a valuer for inspecting the factory site. This valuer visited the factory site. His report is at pages 202 specifically to be duly located there. His identification report is at page 203. We confronted ld. department representative with all these overwhelming evidence. He sought time to produce the search inventory. The same stands submitted in the courses of hearing. Page 53 thereof reveals th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: PROCEDURE FOR SHIFTED OF FINISHED GOODS FROM AP KARNATAKA TO UP

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version