Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Smt Sumathi Gedupudi Versus Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Range-13, Hyderabad

Revision u/s 263 - error in the order of the Assessing Officer in accepting the claim of the assessee under S.54F - Held that:- It is not disputed that the assessee has in fact deposited the total amount in the purchase of the residential house during the stipulated period. Merely because the assessee has availed a bank loan of ₹ 45,45,855 and has invested in the purchase of the residential house, it cannot be denied exemption under S.54F of the Act. The fact that money to that extent has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the sale proceeds in the purchase of residential house qualifying for relief under S.54F, by investing the money out of the sale proceeds of the original asset available with it or by borrowing from the bank. We find that the decision of the Hyderabad Tribunal in Smt.V.Kumuda V/s. DCIT (2012 (2) TMI 212 - ITAT HYDERABAD) relied upon by DR relates to a decision in the Miscellaneous Application preferred by the assessee. At any rate, it is clear that two views are possible on this issue before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the matter, we hold that the Commissioner was not justified in setting aside the assessment framed under S.143(3), as the order of the Assessing Officer could not be said to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. - Decided in favour of the assessee. - ITA No.1403/Hyd/2014 - Dated:- 1-5-2015 - SHRI G.C.GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI P.M.JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri M.Chandramouleswara Rao For The Respondent : Shri D.Sudhakar Rao CIT-DR ORDER Per G.C.Gu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s neither erroneous nor it is prejudicial interest of the revenue. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax has erred in restricting the exception granted u/s. 54F to the extent of ₹ 1,04,51,312/- which is the amount out the sale consideration utilized in the acquisition of a residential house ignoring the fact that the appellant has also utilised an amount of ₹ 45,45,885/- in the acquisition of same residential house even though this a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ary to the provisions of 54F as the conditions is that the cost of new house acquired should not be less than the amount of net sale consideration received on the transfer of the long term capital asset and should have been incurred within the stipulated time. 5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax has erred in not appreciating the fact that the Addl. CIT , Range 13, Hyderabad being the Assessing Officer has correctly consider the provisions of s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under S.54F by restricting the deduction claimed to ₹ 1,04,51,312 and as an amount of ₹ 45,45,855 has to be disallowed representing bank loan used in the purchase of house by the assessee. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has invested a sum of ₹ 1,49,97,000 in the purchase of house. Out of the total investment made in the acquisition of house property, the assessee has utilised an amount of ₹ 45,45,855 by availing housing loan from Kotak M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

yderabad bench of the Tribunal in J.V.Krishna Rao V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax (24.taxmann.com.104); Munnir Khan V/s. ITO(41 SOT 504)(Hyd); Puspa Devi Tibrewala V/s. ITO (dated 22.3.2013 in ITA No1733/Hyd/2011 for assessment year 2007-08); and the decision of Delhi Bench of Tribunal in Kapil Kumar Agarwal V/s. ACIT( dated 16.7.2013 in ITA No.2975/Delhi/2013 for assessment year 2009- 10), besides the decision of Kerala High Court in ITO V/s. K.C.Gopalan (107 Taxman 591). He also relied on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the submissions of the learned counsel for the assessee. He referred to the relevant provisions of S.54F of the Act in support of the case of the Revenue that the sale proceeds of an asset have to be invested in the specified asset within the stipulated time in order to claim deduction under S.54F of the Act. He submitted that the assessee has invested a sum of ₹ 1,04,51,312 out of the sale proceeds from shares of ₹ 1,63,45,644 and therefore, the Commissioner was justified in direct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner. We find that the basic facts of the case are not in dispute. The assessee has invested a sum of ₹ 1,04,51,312 out of the sale proceeds of the shares within the stipulated period. The balance amount of ₹ 45,45,855 was invested in the purchase of house by the assessee by availing housing loan from Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. We find that the issue before us with regard to grant of deduction/exemption under S.54F of the Act with regard to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ief under S.54F, by securing the money spent out of the capital gains from other sources available to it, either by borrowing or otherwise, it is eligible for relief under S.54F in respect of the entire amount of capital gains realised. It was held that in the circumstances, there is merit in the contention of the assessee that in as much as they have made deposits of the amounts equivalent to the capital gains realized in the Capital Gains Investments Scheme, even though part of those capital g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny circular requires establishing direct nexus between the amount received on sale and utilization in the purchase of residential house for the purpose of S.54F and other relevant provisions. The Tribunal held that since money has no colour, all that is required is compliance with the conditions of investment within stipulated time. In Puspa Devi Tibrewala (supra), Hyderabad Tribunal has decided the issue in favour of the assessee and has cited CBDT Circular No.667 dated 18.10.1993 in support of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erS.54F of the Act. The fact that money to that extent has not come directly from the sale proceeds of the original asset received by the assessee, is not decisive of the issue. The fact remains that the amount received by the assessee on the sale of the original asset owned by it was invested in the purchase of the residential asset within the stipulated time, partly from the sale proceeds of the original asset directly and partly from the borrowed amount. The assessee has fulfilled all the con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version