Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Kapurthala Beltings Versus The State of Punjab And Others

2016 (1) TMI 187 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Cancellation of exemption certificate - PGST / PVAT - violation of Rule 2(xia) of the Exemption Rules - appellant submitted that the authorities below misconstrued the definition of 'Export Oriented Unit' given under Rule 2 clause (xi-a) of the Rules, which nowhere provides that the appellant was legally bound to export 25% of its production to claim exemption under Rule 8(1)(vi) of the Rules. - collection of amount in as sales tax / CST from the customer but failure to deposit the same with the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ills "forwarding and postage" was charged which were posted accordingly. These entries of sale prices including the sale tax element were then posted in the accounts of each customer and, thus, the full amount of goods including the sale tax was collected from the customers. However, sale tax collected from the customers was not deposited by the appellant into Government Treasury in violation of the provisions of Sections 10(4) and 30-A of the PGST Act

Appellant was also disbelieved, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rsity in the findings recorded by the authorities below warranting interference by this Court - Decided against assessee. - VATAP No. 66 of 2009 - Dated:- 24-9-2015 - Ajay Kumar Mittal And Ramendra Jain, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Aman Bansal, Adv For the Respondent : Mr Piyush Kant Jain, Addl AG ORDER Ramendra Jain, J. 1. This order shall dispose of VATAP Nos.66 and 67 of 2009 as according to the learned counsel for the parties, common issues arise in both the appeals. However, the facts are be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tified in law in upholding the cancellation of exemption certificate dated 20.4.1998 (Annexure A.2)? ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal is justified in sustaining the cancellation of exemption certificate (Annexure A.2) by holding that there had been violation of Rule 2(xia) of the Exemption Rules which is a definition clause? iii) Whether the learned Tribunal could sustain the cancellation of the exemption certificate (Annexure A.2) without finding viol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty had not recorded any finding on this issue?" 3. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in VATAP No.66 of 2009 may be noticed. The appellant established a unit at village Dhawankha Jagir, Jalandhar Road, Kapurthala to manufacture the Rubber/Leather Nylon Sandwich Beltings and other transmission beltings in the financial year 1989-90 and got it registered as a 'dealer' under the provisions of erstwhile Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (for s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

capacity, the appellant applied for the grant of incentive of sales tax exemption, whereupon, General Manager, District Kapurthala issued eligibility certificate No. 537 dated 30.01.2001 (Annexure A-1) authorizing it to take incentive of sales tax exemption for a period of ten years or for the maximum amount of ₹ 45,71,000/- with effect from 30.09.2000 to 29.09.2010. Pursuant thereto, the Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Kapurthala also issued exemption certificate No. 123/2001 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

axation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority, Kapurthala, issued notice dated 12.09.2002 under Rule 8 of the Punjab General Sales Tax (Deferment and Exemption) Rules, 1991 (for short, 'the Rules') to explain as to why its exemption certificate should not be cancelled for illegally collecting sales tax of ₹ 4,41,658/- from its customers in the shape of handling charges in violation of the provisions of Sections 10(4) and 30-A of the PGST Act. The appellant contested the notice, taking th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lant failed to export at least 25% of its products in the markets outside India during the aforesaid period 2000-01 and 2001-02 and, therefore, did not fulfil the minimum qualifying requirement of law as "Expert Oriented Unit" defined under Rule 2(xi-a) of the Rules. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 14.11.2002 (Annexure A-3), the appellant filed appeal before the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar who remanded the case back to respond .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeals under Section 20(1)(a) of the PGST Act before respondent No.3, which were dismissed vide order dated 17.10.2006 (Annexure A-6). Being dissatisfied, the appellants approached the Punjab Value Added Tax Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') by way of filing its appeals, but remained unsuccessful. Hence the instant appeals by the appellant-assessee. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ith jurisdiction to cancel/sustain the cancellation of the exemption certificate. It was further submitted that the authorities below had erred in holding that the appellant under the garb of "handling charges" was un-authorizedly charging "sales tax" from its customers against "C" Form and "STXXII" Form on the sale invoices in violation of PGST Act/Rules. Even otherwise, the Department of Industries, Punjab had never recommended the cancellation of exempt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

emption certificate granted to the petitioner being Export Oriented Unit? (ii) Whether the appellant had charged only handling charges from its customers? 9. Before dealing with the arguments, it is necessary to reproduce the definition of 'Export Oriented Unit' given in Rule 2(xi-a) of the Rules which reads thus:- "Rule 2 (i) to (x) XXX XXX XXX (xi-a) 'Export oriented unit' means an industrial unit exporting at least twenty-five per cent of its products in markets outside I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessing authority that in the assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02, the appellant exported nothing outside India. In the assessment year 2001-02, the appellant exported only 1.68% of its products in the markets outside India. Further, after going through the said sale invoices and agreement, it was noticed by the assessing authority that the appellant had charged sales tax in the sale vouchers and also posted the same in the sale book under the respective heads i.e. "PST" (Punjab Sal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e tax was collected from the customers. However, sale tax collected from the customers was not deposited by the appellant into Government Treasury in violation of the provisions of Sections 10(4) and 30-A of the PGST Act. To clarify the above fact, the Assessing Authority even mentioned the details of 14 sale vouchers in his order. The abovesaid sale vouchers were never disputed by the appellant. The stand of the appellant that it had only charged "handling charges" from its customers .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,40,514.79 Paise as on 31.03.2001. The stand of the appellant that the said entries were wrongly made was not found to be genuine as it could not give any satisfactory reply. The appellant was also disbelieved, because of not mentioning of charging of "handling charges" on the sale invoice/bills or in the sale books. Even otherwise the appellant had admitted before the Assessing Authority that the amount received from the customers included sales tax. Thus, it was rightly held by the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

intentionally by violating the provisions of law planned and decided to charge and collect sales tax under the Act and the Central Act from his customers and retained the same with him for illegal and fraudulent enrichment, with this scheme in mind he did not mention on the sale invoices/bills that his unit was exempt from payment of sales tax so that his customers could never know that their seller (this dealer) was exempt from payment of tax and could not charge and collect sales tax from the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ler also. The dealer has charged sales tax under the Act and the Central Act in the sale vouchers and posted them in sale book under the respective heads "PST" (Means Punjab sales Tax) and "CST" (Central Sales Tax) as the case may be. In respect of every bill separate entry has been made in the sale book. The dealer neither charged nor recovered any handling charges from the customers and has not mentioned this fact anywhere in sale vouchers or sale book. Only in some bills & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has not been paid by the dealer into the Govt. treasury was confronted to the dealer. xx xx xx xx xx xx xx x xx After going through the record carefully i.e. sale vouchers, account books and other relevant record, I find that the dealer has charged tax and pocketed it but he was not authorized to do so. Moreover the requirements mentioned for availing exemption being an EOU have not been fulfilled by him as such he has contravened the provisions of the Punjab Deferment and Exemption Rules 1991. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version