Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The DCIT, Circle-7 (1) , Hyderabad Versus Mr. Praveen Kumar

Unexplained investment- Held that:- is evident from the material on record that the sale consideration was at ₹ 11,40,000 which was received by the vendor. In my view mere payment of extra stamp duty to fulfil the Government norms, may not come in the line of any unexplained investment by the assessee and his brothers in purchase of property in question, unless any evidence is available with the department that the assessee and his brothers has paid any extra sum, for invoking the provisio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not take place due to mortgage of plots with the HUDA and on release of the mortgaged plots by HUDA on 31.01.2007 vide Lr.No.7676/MP2/PLG/HUDA, the registration took place on 09.03.2007. The A.O. could not produce any documentary evidence that the assessee and his brothers made unexplained investment in purchase of property. Even if at all any unexplained investment has been made by the assessee and his brothers in purchase of property, the said sum could not be brought to tax in this year as a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

T MEMBER For The Revenue by: Mr. M. Sitaram For The Assessee by: Mr. S. Rama Rao ORDER PER B. RAMAKOTAIAH, AM: This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-III, Hyderabad dated 17.04.2015 for A.Y. 2007-2008. The Revenue has raised the following grounds : 1. The Ld. CIT(A) erred both in law and on facts. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that the transfer as per Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act would occur only after registration of the property whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n paid, in the light of the fact that the property was valued at ₹ 66,50,000 by the SRO. 4. Any other ground(s) that may be urged at the time of hearing. Ground Nos. 1 and 4 are general in nature and therefore, it need not be adjudicated. 2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee an individual is the proprietor of M/s. Nav Durga Dal Industries which is engaged in manufacturing and trading of pulses. For the impugned assessment year, the assessee filed its return of income on 08.10.2007 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l, R.R. District vide registered sale deed dated 09.03.2007 was identified jointly with his brothers viz., Mr. Rajender Kumar Agarwal, Mr. Ashok Kumar Agarwal for an amount of ₹ 66,50,000 whereas the registered sale deed shows the value at only ₹ 11,40,000. Admittedly, the land in question was allotted to assessee and the other co-owners vide allotment letter dated 30.07.2005 issued by Vindhya Developers and Builders P. Ltd., (VDB) and the sale consideration of ₹ 11,40,000 was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the land owner Mr. Sudha Kiran (vendor). The A.O. observed that as per the statement filed by the vendor Mr. Sudha Kiran before the SRO, Rajendra Nagar, the total market value of the above mentioned property as on the date of registration was at ₹ 66,50,000 and it is evident from the registered sale deed that the stamp duty of ₹ 5,89,470 and registration fee of ₹ 33,950 were paid by the assessee and his brothers on 09.03.2007 on the chargeable value of ₹ 66,50,000. Ther .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

could not take place as the said property along with few other plots were mortgaged to HUDA as per their norms and the registration would be taken place only upon release of mortgage plots by HUDA. Accordingly, after release of the mortgaged plots by HUDA, the plots in question allotted to the assessee and his brothers was registered on 09.03.2007 and the assessee and his brothers have not paid any over and above sum. The additional stamp duty paid was only to fulfil the Government norms and th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re the Ld. CIT(A) contending inter alia that the A.O. has made the addition only on presumption and surmises and there is no documentary evidence before him that any extra consideration was paid by assessee and his brothers. Therefore, the A.O. is not justified in treating the stamp duty value of ₹ 66,50,000 as the consideration and that the A.O. had erroneously applied section 50C while invoking section 69B which had no basis. The Ld. CIT(A) after careful perusal of the provisions of sect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

I have considered the facts on record and the submissions of the AR. The sale consideration recorded in the sale deed dated 09.03.2007 is admittedly ₹ 11,40,000, of which the appellant's share was ₹ 3,80,000. This sum of ₹ 3,80,000 is also the amount recorded in the statement of affairs of the appellant as on 31.03.2006 as the amount paid for the land. There is no direct evidence of actual payment of any sum over and above the sum of ₹ 3,80,000 (appellant's share .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

RO as the sale consideration, the Assessing Officer has invoked the ratio of sec.50C which is not permitted. Sec.69B would require the Assessing Officer to establish that an investment had been actually made by the appellant for which the sources had not been explained. In the appellant s claim, there is no evidence of such an investment in the first place. 5.4. The reasoning adopted by the Assessing Officer in concluding that there was an investment over and above the amount recorded in the sal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent. The reference to the sum of ₹ 3,80,000 as an 'advance' cannot, therefore, lead to any inference adverse to the appellant. 5.5. The Assessing Officer has also referred to the fact that the land in question was part of the land mortgaged to HUDA and therefore, could not have been transferred to the appellant. Indeed, it is admitted by the appellant that the land had not been transferred in 2005 itself due to this specific restriction placed on it. If the developer was barred fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

umstances from which a reasonable inference can be drawn that the appellant had not correctly disclosed the consideration paid by him. 5.7. The addition of ₹ 18,36,667 to the total income under section 69B is therefore, directed to be deleted and the appeal is allowed. 4. Aggrieved by the Order of the Ld. CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before us. The learned D.R. has strongly relied on the order of the Assessing Officer. The Ld. Counsel while reiterating the submissions made before the R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s disclosed by the assessee. It is evident from the material on record that the sale consideration was at ₹ 11,40,000 which was received by the vendor. In my view mere payment of extra stamp duty to fulfil the Government norms, may not come in the line of any unexplained investment by the assessee and his brothers in purchase of property in question, unless any evidence is available with the department that the assessee and his brothers has paid any extra sum, for invoking the provisions o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

Forum: Credit on Repair of Company Car & Its Insurance

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017

Forum: Trans1 return

News: Exchange Rate of Foreign Currency Relating To Imported and Export Goods Notified

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version