Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s BSNL Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax, Noida

2016 (1) TMI 395 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 - appellant sought the benefit u/s/ 73(3) since it had already deposited the entire service tax objected by the Audit - Held that:- the transaction was properly recorded in the books of account regularly maintained by the assessee/appellant.- the issue was interpretational of notification and exempt on provisions and no active concealment or contumacious conduct having been found on the part of the appellant - penalty imposed under section 77 and 78 of the Act set a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l, is whether the imposition of penalty equivalent to service tax under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, is proper or not. 3. The brief facts of the case are that during course of Audit, it was observed that the appellant have not paid service tax amounting to ₹ 1,08,655/- during the period 3/3/09 to 19/5/09 on account of taxable service provided to the customers located in SEZ, Noida. Under notification Number 9/2009 - ST dated 3/3/2009, appellant had realised ₹ 7,68,682/- again .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

quired to pay an amount equal to 5% or 6% of the value of exempted services under Rule 6 (3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On such, realization for exempt service was of ₹ 4,39,721/- and attracts service tax of ₹ 29,481/-. It was further mentioned in the show-cause notice dated 29.08.2013 that the appellants have paid a total amount of ₹ 1,08,655/- ( Rs. ₹ 79,174/- + ₹ 29,481/-) vide e-receipt Sl.No.50124 dated 11.04.2011, but failed to pay interest thereof. Acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d of interest and observed that the appellant deposited the whole amount of service tax prior to issuance of show-cause notice and penalty of ₹ 1,08,675/- was imposed under Sections 77 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on account of failure to pay service tax in time, suppression of material facts from the department by not reporting in the Service Tax-3 Returns. 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant preferred an appeal before the ld.Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that no show-cause noti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version