Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Prachi Silks, M/s. Nupur Impex, M/s. Mahalaxmi Silk Trading, Radhey Shyam Rander, M/s. Mahalaxmi Silk Trading Co., Bangalore, M/s. Goyal Enterprises, Hemanth Kumar, M/s. Maharaja Impex, Bangalore Versus The Commissioner of Customs & The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai

Waiver of pre-deposit - undue hardship - validity of order of tribunal granting partial stay - Held that:- It is true that the Proviso to Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 empowers the Appellate Commissioner and the Tribunal to dispense with the whole or any part of the pre-deposit amount, if the Appellate Authority is of the opinion that the deposit of duty and interest demanded or penalty levied would cause undue hardship to such persons. But at the same time, while ordering a waiver of pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that it is not necessary for the appellants before the Tribunal to repeat the very same language used in the Proviso to Section 129E parrotlike, for securing an order for waiver. But at the same time, undue hardship, being a question of fact and being a factor that would vary from case to case and from person to person, an obligation is primarily cast upon any person seeking waiver to specifically plead the circumstances, in which, he is placed. But unfortunately, none of the appellants fulfill .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty is levied together with penalty, the Tribunal has rounded off the duty amount to the next higher or lower figure and directed the said amount to be deposited.

Therefore, we see no reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal - Accordingly, all the civil miscellaneous appeals are dismissed - Decided against the appellants. - CMA.Nos.2110 to CMA.No.2116/2015 - Dated:- 27-10-2015 - MR. V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND MR. T.MATHIVANAN, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr. V.T. Gopalan, SC for Mr.S. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. V. Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the first respondent. 3. It appears that in the course of an investigation, it was found out that imports of mulberry raw silk/silk yarn of 27,020.93 Kgs valued at ₹ 3,36,10,640/- were made duty free, using three advance authorisations of one M/s.Kalp Impex of Surat by one Ramanand Surekha, owner of Goyal Enterprises of Bangalore. It was claimed that by diverting the goods to Bangalor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d by the common order in original passed on 27.3.2014 against various persons, 21 independent appeals came to be filed before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeals were accompanied by applications for waiver of pre-deposit condition and also for stay of enforcement of the order in original pending disposal of the appeals. 5. The miscellaneous petitions for waiver and stay were disposed of by the South Zonal Bench at Chennai of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax App .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filed by Kalpesh Patel, one was filed by Swapnil Patel, two were filed by Dipal J.Shah, two were filed by Prachi Silks, one was by Mahalaxmi Silk Trading, one was filed by Masterstroke Freight Forwarders Private Limited, another was filed by Meticulor Forwarders, yet another appeal was filed by Ramanand Surekha, one appeal each was filed by Radhey Shyam Rander, Goyal Enterprises, Hemanth Kumar, Super Shipping Services, Nupur Impex and Manjunatha Shipping Services Private Limited. 7. The amount .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

00/- 4,00,000/- 4 C/S/41873/2014 in C/41623/2014 Kalpesh Patel 2,00,000/- 50,000/- 5 C/S/41874/2014 in C/41624/2014 Kalpesh Patel 2,00,000/- 50,000/- 6 C/S/41875/2014 in C/41625/2014 Swapnil Patel 3,00,000/- 50,000/- 7 C/S/41876/2014 in C/41626/2014 Kalpesh Patel 1,03,78,016/- 26,00,000/- NIL 8 C/S/41662/2014 in C/41376/2014 Dipal J.Shah 3,00,000/- 50,000/- 9 C/S/41663/2014 in C/41377/2014 Dipal J.Shah 2,00,000/- 30,000/- 10 C/S/41366/2014 in C/41142/2014 Masterstroke Freight Forwarders P.Ltd. 4 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,000/- 50,00,000/- 17 C/S/41850/2014 in C/41592/2014 Radhey Shyam Rander 5,00,000/- 5,00,000/- 18 C/S/41852/2014 in C/41593/2014 Goyal Enterprises 1,49,24,031/- 25,00,000/- 1,50,00,000/- 19 C/S/41854/2014 in C/41594/2014 Hemanth Kumar 5,00,000/- 5,00,000/- 20 C/COD/42026/2014, C/S/42025/2014 in C/41738/2014 Super Shipping Services 10,00,000/- 7,00,000/- 21 C/COD/42028/2014, C/S/41027/2014 in C/41739/2014 Manjunatha Shipping Services Pvt.Ltd. 5,00,000/- 3,00,000/- 8. Out of the appellants in Col. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

make a pre-deposit, is wholly illegal, since the appellants were neither the importers nor the owners of the goods (ii) that instead of deciding the question of waiver of pre-deposit, on the parameters of undue hardship, as stipulated in Section 129E, the Tribunal laid focus on prima facie case and arrived at a wrong conclusion (iii) that the Tribunal erred in taking the interests of the Revenue alone to be the only criterian for deciding the applications for waiver and deposit and (iv) that by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on that the deposit of duty and interest demanded or penalty levied would cause undue hardship to such persons. But at the same time, while ordering a waiver of pre-deposit, the Appellate Authority is entitled to impose such conditions as it may deem fit to impose, so as to safeguard the interests of the Revenue. 12. Therefore, the exercise of power to dispense with the pre-deposit condition is controlled by two guiding factors namely (a) undue hardship to the appellants and (ii) safeguarding th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rameters of prima facie case into the issue of undue hardship. 14. In Vijay Prakash D.Mehta Vs. Collector of Customs [AIR 1988 SC 2010], the Supreme Court indicated that all relevant factors such as the probability of a prima facie case for the appellants, the conduct of the parties, etc., can be taken into account, while deciding the question of undue hardship. At the same time, the Supreme Court cautioned in Benara Volves Vs. C.C.E. [2006 (13) SCC 347], that merely upon the establishment of a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng the existence of a prima facie case. But, the Court cautioned that merits of the case should not otherwise be ordinarily gone into, unless the question on the face of it appears to be concluded. 16. Keeping in mind these parameters, if we come back to the case on hand, it is seen that the Tribunal went only into the question of prima facie case from paragraphs 22.1 upto 22.5 of its order. The Tribunal did not go into the question of undue hardship at all. 17. Therefore, it is vehemently conte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal could not have gone into that question in the absence of any specific pleading. 19. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Senior Panel Counsel for the Department, we directed the learned counsel for the appellants on record to file copies of the waiver applications made by the appellants before the Tribunal. The applications for waiver, filed by all the appellants herein, have been filed before us. 20. It is seen from the applications for waiver filed by the appellants that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

being a factor that would vary from case to case and from person to person, an obligation is primarily cast upon any person seeking waiver to specifically plead the circumstances, in which, he is placed. But unfortunately, none of the appellants fulfilled this most fundamental requirement, in their application for waiver. 22. As a matter of fact, all the applications for waiver filed by the appellants herein contained six paragraphs. The first paragraph gave details of the duty levied and the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llows : "Under the said circumstances, the appellants submit that calling upon them to pre-deposit any amounts towards hearing of the captioned appeal would be an onerous one, particularly when the balance of convenience and prima facie case is in favour of the applicants. The applicants further submit that they are going through a deep financial crisis, particularly because goods worth over ₹ 2 Crores sold by them on high seas sales to M/s.Ravi Enterprises, Surat are lying at Chennai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

id circumstances, the applicants submit that calling upon them to pre-deposit any amounts towards hearing of the captioned appeal would be an onerous one, particularly when the balance of convenience and prima facie case is in favour of the applicants. The applicants further submit that they are going through a deep financial crisis and are not in a position to come up with any amount for pre-deposit, despite they having an excellent case on merits." 24. Therefore, the Senior Panel Counsel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cation orders above, prima facie reveals that advance authorisations were obtained by Vishal Agarwal in the name of his binamidar employees without any plant or machinery installed at the premises falsely declared to be the place of manufacture. Such authorisations were lent to the importers of Bangalore to import silk yarn duty free. They pretended to be high sea sellers on the basis of fabricated documents. Upon clearance of the duty free goods in Chennai Port, those were transported to Bangal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s. Such money parked in different bank accounts maintained in the name of benamidars, some of whom were holders of advance authorisation. Such money again reverted back as sales consideration of imported goods to the original importers pretending to be high seas sellers. High seas sale was nothing but a cloak and the importers masqueraded as high seas sellers. Ultimate beneficiary of fraud was importers and Vishal Agarwal. The advance authorisation agreements executed by benamidars were no man o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onduits also acted to cause detriment to the interest of revenue and evasion of customs duty of high scale was made by the racket. 22.4 Further, the plea that in earlier occasion, appeals were remanded has no logical sense when the apparent is not real and prima facie the case reveals that Revenue has been prejudiced. Also there is no question of time bar when apparent fraud from record suggests that the appellant should be dealt in the jaws of the law. It is settled principles of law that when .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, it was contended by Mr.V.T.Gopalan, learned Senior Counsel that the Tribunal has given waiver ranging from 0% to 100% in those 21 appeals before it, without even giving any reasons as to why the appellants came to be treated differently from one another. 28. But, we do not think that the said contention is correct. A careful look at the table extracted in paragraph 7 above would show that the Tribunal decided the cases into two categories namely (i) those, in which, a duty was levied together .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version