Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dr. S. Chandra Sekhar Versus ITO Ward-4 Rajahmundry

Revision u/s 263 - Eligibility for the benefit u/s 54F need to be denied as per CIT(A) - Held that:- The transfer was completed in terms of section 2(47)(v) by giving possession of the property in terms of the sale agreement dated 13.6.2005 registration was delayed on bonafide reasons which was beyond the control of the assessee and sale deed was executed on 25.11.2005 was only a legal formality. The jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Anand Food Products (2013 (11) TMI 1444 - ANDHR .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r passed by Assessing Officer is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue and therefore the order passed by the Ld. CIT u/s 263 of the Act cannot survive.

So far as merits of the case is concerned in respect of the claim u/s 54F of the Act, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has considered this issue in the case of Balraj Vs. CIT (2001 (12) TMI 51 - DELHI High Court ) and observed that for claiming benefit u/s 54F of the Act, it is not necessary that the assessee sho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r on merits has allowed the case u/s 54F of the Act in accordance with law. This cannot be a case for revision u/s 263 of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A.No.350/Vizag/2013 - Dated:- 18-11-2015 - SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR For The Respondent : Shri Ch. Omkareswar, DR ORDER ORDER PER V. DURGA RAO, Judicial Member: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT, Rajahmu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ower u/s 263 of the Act, issued a show cause notice to the assessee dated 18.2.2013 on the ground that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue and show caused to the assessee why the order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be reversed. In response to the show cause notice issued by the Ld. CIT, the assessee has submitted a detailed reply dated 7.3.2013. The Ld. CIT after considering the submissions filed by the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in respect of u/s 54F of the Act, the Ld. CIT has observed that the assessee neither purchased the property nor constructed residential house property from the capital gain accrued from the sale of the capital asset. The assessee has only contributed money for the construction of the house and the land owned by his father. Therefore, the assessee is not eligible for the benefit u/s 54F of the Act and directed the Assessing Officer to revise his order as per his observations. 5. On being aggriev .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

neous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. He further submitted that the assessee has received sale consideration on 18.6.2007 through a cheque and subsequently through a GPA dt.9.7.2007 the property was sold to the purchaser and the purchaser of the property got registered on 29.8.2007 and submitted that when assessee already received the amount and signed the GPA and transferred his entire rights to the purchaser, the transfer was concluded as per section 2(47)(v) of the Act and sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee passed an order, it cannot be said that the order of the Assessing Officer is erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 6. In so far as the claim of assessee in respect of u/s 54F of the Act is concerned, the assessee sold the property and the same was invested for the construction of the house on the land belonging to assessee s father and assessee is also having a 1/3rd share of the property as per the partition deed. He relied on the judgement of the Delhi High Court i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itted that the assessing officer without making any enquiry and also not applying the mind passed the assessment order. Therefore, the order passed by the A.O. is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. To support his argument, he relied on the judgements in the case of Rampyari Devi Saraogi Vs. CIT 67 ITR 84 (SC) & 341 ITR 434 in the case of CIT Vs. Jawahar Bhattacharjee. The Ld. DR stated that the assessing officer has not made a proper enquiry, therefore, the assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ers of the authorities below. The assessee is a nonresident individual filed a return of income by declaring nil income. The return filed by the assessee was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act and after due process, the assessing officer completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act. The assessing officer in the assessment order has observed that on verification of the record, it was found that the assessee has purchased an agricultural land at Rajahmundry on 21.2.1985 vide document no.6525/1985 f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alling the details such as the property which was originally purchased by the assessee and also subsequently sold to the purchaser on 9.7.2007 through a GPA. The Assessing Officer also examined the sale consideration of ₹ 60 lakhs and market value as on date of 9.7.2007 was ₹ 1,59,72,000/- and accordingly capital gains was calculated. The objection of the Ld. CIT is that as on the date of the registration i.e. 29.8.2007 the market value of the property is of ₹ 2,17,80,000/-. Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urchaser and GPA was executed in favour of the purchaser on 9.7.2007 and as on the date of execution of GPA, the market value of the property was ₹ 1,59,72,000/- and accordingly Assessing Officer came to a conclusion that the market value of the property is ₹ 1,59,72,000/-. Subsequently, the purchaser registered the property in his name on 29.8.2007, the market value of the property is ₹ 2,17,80,000/-. In our opinion, once assessee received sale consideration and transferred th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al for the purpose of value of the property in the hands of the assessee. Hence, we find that the order passed by the Assessing Officer is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The order passed by the Ld. CIT on this count cannot stand. Even otherwise, the assessing officer after examining all the details of the property i.e. when the assessee originally purchased the property and the subsequent sale consideration, the market value of the property as per the stamp val .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r having made an assessment after considering relevant material and the explanation offered by the assessee in pursuance of the notice issued u/s 143(1) of the Act as well as u/s 143(2) of the Act action u/s 263 of the Act was not justified merely because a different view was possible appraisal of the material produced by the assessee. In the case of CIT Vs. S. Venkata Reddy (supra), the Hyderabad bench of the Tribunal has held that as per section 2(47)(v) of the Act when the vendor given the po .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Products (supra) has observed that during the assessment proceedings the assessing officer had not only taken into account all the details but also disallowed some expenditure and made addition whenever same was required. A decision of the Assessing Officer could not be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue simply because it did not make detailed discussion and upheld the order passed by the Tribunal. Keeping in view of the above judicial precedent, we are of the opinion that the order pas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ocument no.5441/1994 (4) ₹ 93,450/- on 18.8.194 vide document no.5507/1994. The assessee sold all the properties on 18.6.2007 vide document no.6542/2007 for a sale consideration of ₹ 80,91,000/-. The sale consideration has been invested by the assessee in a house property situated at Banjara Hills, Hyderabad value at ₹ 2,73,87,000/- by registered valuer which is standing in the name of the assessee and two other persons i.e. K. Penchala Naidu and Smt. Varalakshmi. He further ob .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erefore not entitled for the benefit u/s 54F of the Act. We find that the assessing officer after examining all the details of the properties which Assessee was purchased earlier and sold subsequently and received consideration was invested on the property which i.e. in the name of his father Shri S. Penchala Naidu and claimed benefit u/s 54F of the Act. The assessing officer after examining all the details has passed the assessment order in detailed manner. In our opinion, the order passed by t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version