Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Range-VI, Lucknow Versus M/s Technical Associates Ltd.

Reopening of assessment - assessee has wrongly claimed deduction u/s 80IC - Held that:- Assessee has furnished the consolidated tax audit report and financial statement and the notes claiming deduction under section 80IC of the Act. During the course of assessment proceeding and thereafter claim was allowed in other assessment years. Now, the Assessing Officer has taken a different stands for reopening the assessment without looking into the fact that in succeeding year the claim of deduction u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s made during relevant assessment year as compared to NIL opening balance as on 01.04.2008 being new undertaking/enterprises. Therefore, we are of the view that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 80IC of the Act as the addition to the plant and machinery is required to a particular undertakings and not the assessee as whole. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA Nos.842/LKW/2014 - Dated:- 19-11-2015 - SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he submission of assessee made before him. the CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the assessee did not disclose complete facts during the course of assessment proceeding by not furnishing separate Tax Audit Report in Form No.1OCCB for Sitarganj Unit as prescribed under Rule 18BBB of the Income Tax Act, 1962. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (A), Lucknow has erred in law and on facts of the case in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC at ₹ 1,50,09,117/- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act, assessing the total income of ₹ 24,19,80,973/-. Having formed a belief on the basis of assessment framed for the AY 2010-11 that the assessee does not disclose the complete facts necessary for the AY 2009-10 and has wrongly claimed deduction u/s 80IC of the Act for AY 2009-10 in respect of Sitarganj Unit, the Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 of the Act and reopened the assessment. In compliance of notice u/s 148 of the Act, the assessee submitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lone in the relevant financial year, and substantial expansion is to be construed for Sitarganj undertaking only as the words present in sub section (2) of Section 80IC of the Act is undertaking or enterprise alone and not assessee or assessee as a whole. It was further contended that the assessment of the assessee was completed after numerous hearing had taken place and the AO had examined all possible issues including claim u/s 80IC of the Act. The Assessing Officer was not convinced with the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng Officer has allowed deduction u/s 80IC in other assessment years and these facts were not taken into account by him while reopening the assessment. Therefore, reopening was done on the basis of change of opinion. On merit also, Ld. counsel for the assessee has contended that assessee has furnished tax audit report alongwith the return of income and there was no requirement of law to prepare a separate tax audit report for the unit on which deduction is claimed. The assessee has furnished the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

consolidated tax audit report and separate financial statement in respect of Sitarganj Unit filed before him. The relevant observations of the CIT(A) is hereunder for the sake of reference: I have examined the reasons recorded u/s 147 of the Act for issue of notice u/s 148, finding given by the A.O. in assessment order and written submissions of appellant finding during appellate proceedings and assessment records of Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2010-11, and various judicial pronouncements as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

edings the appellant was directed to furnish all evidences to prove the correctness and genuineness of the claim u/s 80IC of the Act of ₹ 1,50,09,117/- . In compliance to said query raised the appellant has again filed copy of tax audit report, consolidated and separate financial statement in respect of Sitarganj Unit, report in form No. 10CCB for claim of deduction u/s 80IC, bills & vouchers of Plant & Machinery installed in Sitarganj Unit, copy of allotment of land at Sitarganj, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions of I.T. Act. The A.O. himself examined all the relevant records at the time of regular assessment proceeding in respect of claim of deduction u/s IC of the Act of ₹ 1,50,09,117/- . Therefore, I find much force in the argument of appellant that the initiation of proceedings u/s 147 of the Act and issue of notice_u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law and contrary to the provisions of IT Act. The AO has wrongly assumed the jurisdiction u/s 147/ 148 of the 1,T. Act. Thus the ground No.2 raised .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any, fulfilled all the conditions laid down u/s 80IC of the Act. Therefore, the A.O. should have allowed its legitimate claim made u/s 80IC of the Act of ₹ 1,50,09,117/- . I have examined the written submissions of appellant filed during appellate proceedings, finding given by A.O. in assessment order, assessment records of A.Y. 2009-10 & 2010-11 , scrutiny assessment order framed u/s 143(3) of the Act of A.Y./ 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 and tax audit reports alongwith its annexures, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction u/s 80IC after verification from relevant records i.e. copy of ITR of appellant, relevant tax audit reports & notes of accounts given in tax audit report etc. as mentioned above in A.Yrs. 2009-10,2010- 11 & 2011-12, therefore, there was no reason to withdraw the claim u/s 80IC which was allowed in original assessment proceedings of A.Y. 2009-10. The A.O. has mentioned in the reasons recorded u/s 147 of the Act that substantial expansion did not take place in appellant case during t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tarakhand. I have examined the copy of P&L A/c and Balance sheet & its annexures and I found that the appellant has established the complete new unit at Sitarganj during the assessment year under consideration and manufacturing and sales took place in the assessment year under consideration. Since the entire investment in Sitarganj Unit in Plant & Machinery of ₹ 37,52,759/- was made during relevant assessment year as compared to NIL opening balance as on 01.04.2008 being new un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re, the condition of substantial expansion as stated in the provisions of sub section (8) of 80IC of the Act is fulfilled. The A.O. has not properly appreciated the applicability of the relevant provisions of I.T. Act, 1961 u/s80IC, Looking, into the above facts on_merit also the disallowances made by the AO u/s 80IC of the Act of ₹ 1,50,09,117/- cannot be said proper & justified and same liable to be deleted. The A.O. is directed to delete the addition of ₹ 1,50,09,117/-. The ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

207 of the compilation of the assessee. Our attention was also invited to the assessment order for AY 2012-13 in which the Assessing Officer has recorded in his order that the claim of the assessee u/s 80IC of the Act was also examined by the AO in AY 2011-12 before allowing the same. It was further contended that though in AY 2011-12, the claim of the assessee was allowed but the assessment was not reopened by the AO u/s 148 of the Act. Ld. counsel for the assessee further contended that the As .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee has furnished the requisite information before the Assessing Officer in order to establish that there was no opening balance of plant and machinery in Sitarganj undertaking and the entire amount reflecting as gross book value is on account of additions aggregating to ₹ 37,52,759/- made to plant & machinery alone in the relevant financial year. Ld. counsel for the assessee has also placed reliance upon the following judgments in support of his contention that once the claim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

25 (Del) vii) CIT Vs. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. [2008] 173 taxmann 409 viii) CIT Vs. Chintoo Tomar [2015] 54 taxmann.com 289 ix) CIT Vs.Vaishali Avenue [2014] 48 taxamnn.com 289 x) CIT Vs. India Rare Earths Ltd. [2015] 61 taxmann.com 179 xi) GKN Sinter Metals Ltd. Vs. ACIT [2015] 55 taxmann.com 138 xii) Pine Chemicals Ltd. Vs. DCIT [2015] 57 taxmann.com 302 xiii) IBS Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India [2015] 59 taxamann.com 96 xiv) CIT Vs. Schwing Stetter India Pvt. L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ingly, same has been claimed in the income tax return of the year. It was further contended that since all these information were available before the Assessing Officer, it cannot be said that he has not applied his mind before allowing the claim of the assessee u/s 80IC of the Act. On merit, Ld. counsel for the assessee has contended that the assessee has made the addition in plant and machinery amounting only to ₹ 37,52,759/- in Sitarganj Unit, therefore assessee is entitled for deductio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is regard. 8. Though the assessment was reopened on 17.06.2013 for AY 2009-10, but no interference was made in the assessment order passed in AY 2010-11 on 22.12.2012 allowing the deduction u/s 80IC of the Act. It is also evident from record that other in AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 deduction u/s 80IC was allowed and in the order for AY 2011- 12 the AO himself has observed that Assessing Officer has made an enquiry while allowing the claim of deduction u/s 80IC for AY 2010-11. Meaning thereby, while .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

led the consolidated tax audit report along with financial statement of the Sitarganj Unit on which deduction u/s 80IC was claimed. 9. We have also carefully examined various judicial pronouncements rendered on this issue and we find that in those judgments it has been repeatedly held that whenever the Assessing Officer has allowed the claim of the assessee having applied his mind the reopening of the assessment is not possible as it amount to the change of opinion. 10. In the case of GKN Sinter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

indicating the manner in which it had worked out its claim for deduction under 80-IA. The note indicated that the expenses were allocated between the three manufacturing units on basis of their turnover. Similarly in the instant case, the assessee has given a note in the auditor s report that Sitarganj Unit in Uttrakhand State has commenced commercial production w.e.f. 02.02.2009. The company is eligible for deduction u/s 80IC of the Act to the extent of 100% of the profit, Accordingly, same has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be necessarily examined before grant of exemption under section 10A are not gone into, then it is default of officer concerned and not assessee. 10.2 In the case of Pine Chemicals Ltd. Vs. DCIT reported in 57 taxmann.com 302 (Gujarat), the lordship of Gujarat High Court has held that the Tribunal was not right in holding that assessment was validly reopened under section 147, in spite of the fact that all primary facts were disclosed by the appellant in the return of income and after considering .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version