Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (1) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Eligibility for exemption subject to the proof of certificate - concessional rate of tax - Held that:- Yet another opportunity may be given to the petitioner with respect to the claim of production of declaration forms alone, this Court is inclined to grant sufficient time to the petitioner for production of C forms. - by quashing the impugned orders dated 07.09.2015, this Court permits the petitioner to file C declaration forms before the respondent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal Government Pleader (Taxes), takes notice for the respondent and with their consent, the main writ petitions are taken up for disposal. 2.These writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders of the respondent dated 07.09.2015. 3. The petitioner, who is a registered dealer on the files of the respondent, are engaged in buying and selling of Sago and Starch. According to the petitioner, since the inter-state sales of Sago purchased from M/s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

06.2015 for the assessment years 2011-12, 2013-14 and 2012-13 respectively, for disallowing the claim of exemption and also disallowing concessional rate of tax in respect of direct inter-state sales falling under Section 8(1) of the CST Act, 1956. According to the petitioner, as far as assessment year 2012-13 is concerned, the petitioner produced the details and the certificates along with the declarations, however, though revised notice dated 31.07.2015 was issued, disallowed the exemption in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat when the assessment was made under Section 22(4) of the VAT Act read with Section 9(2) of the CST Act, 1956, opportunity of being heard ought to have been provided by the respondent, before confirming the proposal. Hence, there is violation of principles of natural justice. Further, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, when the petitioners are having the declarations and details relating to the purchases from M/s Sago Serve, Salem, without providing sufficient opportunity, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version