Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s UPS Jetair Express Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs, CSI Airport, Mumbai

2016 (1) TMI 512 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Levy of penalty on courier agency on the ground that they have failed to exercise due diligence in performing their work as an authorized courier and thus, their inaction/negligence has led to this attempt of smuggling of costly goods in the guise of low value spare parts. - Held that:- the appellants are a Courier Company and in ordinary course of business they do not come to know about the factual desertion of the goods or actual value of the same. They are only aware of the details as disclos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er regulation 13(b) can be made. - However, regulation 13(c) provides for a very wide scope. - The appellants were required to exercise due diligence. The fact that the weight of consignment was 22 kg and the freight was ₹ 25,000/- but the declared value was less than ₹ 3000/- should have raised suspicion. Therefore, it is felt that it was possible for the appellant to exercise due diligence in respect of the consignment. Considering that the appellants are in the courier busines .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt is a courier company. The facts of the case are that the Applicant filed a courier Bill of Entry wherein the description of the goods was declared as Spare Parts and value was declared as ₹ 2934/-. On preliminary examination of the package revealed that it contained two sets of ARRI Alexa Camera (Made in Germany) and 10 pcs of memory cards 32 GB(Made in Japan). It appeared that there was mis-declaration of goods and gross undervaluation, therefore the carton was detained. The carton was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ox. ₹ 5 Lakhs (CIF). Goods valued at ₹ 65 Lakhs were seized. After issuance of show cause notice and considering reply from the noticees including the present Appellant and hearing the parties, the Ld. Commissioner adjudicated the show cause notice vide the impugned order wherein amongst other confirmation, he imposed penalty of ₹ 1,00,000/- upon the Applicant on the ground that they have failed to exercise due diligence in performing their work as an authorized courier and thu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o fails to comply with any provision of this Act with which it was his duty to comply, where no express penalty is elsewhere provided for such contravention or failure, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding one lakh rupees." The learned Counsel argued that penalty under Section 117 can only be imposed when a person contravenes any provisions of the Act or abets any such provision or fails to comply the provisions of the said Act, which was duty to comply. Learned Counsel argued that no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

endered such goods liable to confiscation under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act. As regards the proposal for penal action against them under Section 112 and 114AA ibid, I find that the investigation could not unearth any concrete evidence regarding their knowledge of the mis-declaration of the goods under seizure and their connivance in the attempt for evasion of duty. Therefore penal action under Section 117 of the Customs Act is found to be commensurate with their violation o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

charges for the consignment was ₹ 25,000/- and these facts should have automatically made the appellant suspicious of the consignment. He argued that the appellant failed in his obligation prescribed under Regulation 13(a), 13(b), and 13(c). Such obligation of the authorized courier under Regulation 13 are as follows:- "13. Obligations of Authorised Courier. An Authorised Courier shall - (a) obtain an authorisation, from each of the consignees of the import goods for whom such Courier .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and rules and regulations made thereunder and in case of non-compliance thereof shall bring the matter to the notice of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs; (c) exercise due diligence to ascertain the correctness and completeness of any information which he submits to the proper officer with reference to any work related to the clearance of import goods or of export goods; 4. I have considered the rival sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version