Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Kuber Farms P. Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

2016 (1) TMI 542 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Disallowance tax deductible expenses - Held that:- Disallowance of the expenses to the extent of ₹ 3.44 lakhs by the AO cannot be sustained in law particularly when audited accounts, containing two separate P&L accounts for the two distinct lines of activity, were not rejected. The disallowance could not have been made on the basis of surmises and conjectures. There was no material before the AO to come to the conclusion that the expenses were either excessive or unreasonable. The impugned .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Sushil Kumar and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra K. Singh, Mr.Shikhar Garg And Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocates. ORDER 1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act ) is directed against an order dated 15th December 2003 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in ITA No. 2015/Del/2000 for the Assessment Year ( AY ) 1996-97. 2. While admitting this appeal on 5th July 2004, the followi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

6-97 was the first year in which the Assessee undertook the business of financial activities. 4. The Assessee filed its return declaring an income of ₹ 13,34,870. Enclosed with the return were two audited Profit & Loss Accounts - one relating to the agricultural activities in which a loss of ₹ 84,890 was shown and the other relating to financial activities showing a net profit of ₹ 13,34,872. 5. The return was picked up for scrutiny. In the assessment order dated 22nd March .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cally in respect of two items of expenditure - one, the Director s salary which was ₹ 44,000 per annum and the other in the sum of ₹ 3 lakhs towards the salary paid to the staff and other miscellaneous expenses. 6. The appeal by the Assessee was allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [ CIT (A) ] by an order dated 14th January 2000. The CIT (A) noted that the Assessee had started paying salary to its Directors from the year in which it started the financial activity. In t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version