Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, CC-38, Mumbai Versus M/s. Risk Design & Advertising Ltd.,

2016 (1) TMI 565 - ITAT MUMBAI

Unexplained cash credit - assessee has failed to prove that how he received such share application money and has booked the same only by way book entry - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- CIT(A) agreed with the plea of assessee that since said sums were credited in the books of account of assessee in A.Ys. 2006-07. In 2008-09, these cannot be treated as unexplained cash credits u/s. 68 in A.Y. under consideration. Assessee is at liberty to take legal argument at any stage in support of h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

15 - SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER, AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri Jeetendra Kumar, D.R. For The Respondent : Dr. P. Daniel and Shri S.M. Makhija, A.R. ORDER PER SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, J.M: This appeal has been filed by Revenue against the order of Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-41, Mumbai, dated 31.07.2013 for A.Y. 2009-10 on following ground: (1). Whether on the facts and circumstances of case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in del .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

deration on 30.09.2009 declaring loss of ₹ 2,13,71,520/-. Assessment was processed u/s.143(1) of the Act. The case of assessee was selected under scrutiny and after considering the submissions on behalf of assessee, assessment was completed by Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) vide order passed on 30.12.2011 determining total income of assessee company at ₹ 21,84,85,920/- after making various additions and disallowances. 2.1 Matter was carried before the First Appellate Authority, wherein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e proof of share application money received and to submit evidences to establish the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the persons giving share application money. Assessee was also asked to submit complete documents starting from share advertisement inviting share application till the intimation to ROC for this purpose. Assessee furnished only name and address along with PAN of persons from whom share application money of ₹ 7,20,20,026/- had been received. Assessing Officer obs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lication money of ₹ 3,64,00,000/- was received from M/s. Sonata Realty Pvt. Ltd. (a related entity) during A.Y. under consideration. Assessee furnished address and PAN of this party. In his remand report, Assessing Officer has not drawn any adverse inference with regards to genuineness of this transaction. In this regard, assessee vide letter dated 15.07.2013 submitted that Assessing Officer has cross verified the transaction from the records of M/s. Sonata Realty Pvt. Ltd., which is also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.25,00,000/-), it was observed by CIT(A) that these amounts were originally paid by these persons to assessee in A.Y. 2006-07. In this connection, said parties submitted their confirmations to Assessing Officer in response to the notices u/s.133(6) issued by him in course of remand proceedings. It was stated by assessee in course of remand proceedings that assessee transferred these amounts aggregating to ₹ 2,26,00,000/- to its sister concern, namely, M/s Sonata Realty Pvt. Ltd. by way of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

regard to payment of share application money aggregating to ₹ 2,26,00,000/- have already been received by Assessing Officer thereby establishing the identity of said share applicants, their financial capacity and the genuineness of transactions. The onus cast upon the assessee in this regard, stood discharged. The mere fact that transfer of share application money to assessee has not taken place by way of cheque/cash but by way of book adjustment between assessee and its sister concern; M/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3.2 This reasoned factual finding of CIT(A) needs no interference from our side. We uphold the same. 4. As regards the remaining share applicants, Assessing Officer vide his remand report pointed out that in remand proceedings, assessee could not give PAN and address of Mr. Hetal Parekh (Rs.7,00,000/-) and Ms. Kanchan Sharma (Rs.5,00,000/-), while no reply was received from M/s. RGV Films Pvt. Ltd. (Rs.1,18,20,026/-). In this regard, it was informed by him that assessee vide letter dated 14.06.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version