Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 692 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (1) TMI 692 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Levy of penalty on the petitioner carrying gold in the form of two gold bars and gold coins - they were passing through Green Channel with his hand bag - the petitioner preferred an appeal before the CESTAT in C/40694/2015 and the same is pending consideration. In the meantime, the petitioner has filed an application in No.C/EH/40307/2015, which was allowed and the appeal was posted for hearing on 10.09.2015. It is the contention of the learned counse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly before the CESTAT only. Since the appeal itself is rejected by the Commissioner of Appeals, the question of cross-examination to be considered by the Commissioner of Appeal at this stage cannot be countenanced. - Petition dismissed. - W.P.No.33285 of 2015 And M.P.No.1 of 2015 - Dated:- 17-12-2015 - MR. R. MAHADEVAN, J For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Siva Shankar For the Respondents : Mr. K. Mohana Murali, Standing Counsel ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Mohan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as stopped by a person in plain clothes who later identified himself as Customs Officer and on checking it came to light that the petitioner brought gold worth ₹ 65,61,670/-. The issue involved in this writ petition is with regard to absolute confiscation and imposition of penalty on the petitioner carrying gold in the form of two gold bars weighing 1000 grams each of 24 karat purity and 40 Nos. gold coins weighing 8 grams each of 22 karat, the value of which is ₹ 65,61,760/- and the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the letter of the petitioner dated 13.02.2015, requesting for cross-examination of the Mahazar witnesses and the Superintendent of Customs (AIU), the witnesses who signed the mahazar, the petitioner was informed to file a proper petition for the same and accordingly, he has filed a petition before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Chennai, on 24.02.2015. The petitioner again, has also made an application for cross examination on 16.03.2015 without proper knowledge of Commissioner's rej .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version