Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-I, Tambaram Versus M/s. Goraa Overseas,

2016 (1) TMI 749 - ITAT CHENNAI

Disallowance made u/s.40(a)(ia) - disallowance on the reason that the expenditure is covered u/s.28 and not covered under sections 30 to 38 - CIT(A) deleted the disallowance - Held that:- The provisions of sec.194C of the Act cannot come into play when the payments have been made to agents of a non-resident company and relied on the order of the Kolkata Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Taj Leather Works v. ACIT (2012 (7) TMI 300 - ITAT KOLKATA ). To uphold this argument also, there is no det .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Considering the judgment of the Special Bench of the Tribunal, in the case of Merilyn Shipping and Transports v. ACIT (supra), we are inclined to remit the issue for fresh consideration. - Decided in favour of revenue for statistical purposes.

Disallowance u/s 43B - addition made in respect of employees contribution to PF and ESI - whether the sum were remitted within the due date of filing the return of income? - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Sums were not credited by t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gement and orders passed by the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowances made by the AO are hereby quashed and set aside and the disallowances of the respective sums with respect to the Provident Fund / ESI Fund made by the AO is hereby restored. - Decided against assessee - ITA No. 1220/Mds/2013, CO No.107/Mds/2013 - Dated:- 6-11-2015 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri A.B.Koli, JCIT For The Respondent : Shri Vikram Vijayara .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e cross-objection filed by the assessee is in supportive of the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) . 4. The facts of the case are that the assessee has made the payments to M/s. Vasantham Cargo Agencies of ₹ 14,90,640/- towards freight charges, M/s. S.K.Leathers of ₹ 12,72,881/- and to M/s. Vignesh Leathers of ₹ 61,980/-, totalling ₹ 3,34,861/- towards machinery charges. The AO disallowed the above expenditure citing the reason that the assessee failed to de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9 SOT 13 (Hyd.) and Chennai C Bench in the case of ACIT v. Lakshmi Jewellery in ITA No.2005/Mds/2010 dated 6.9.2011 and directed the AO to delete the addition. 6. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. The ld. AR, relied on the order of the Tribunal in the case of ACIT v. M/s. Shri Balaji Communications in ITA 1744/Mds/2011 dated 20.12.2012, wherein it was observed vide para 9 & 10 as under: 9. Now coming to the cross-objections of the assessee, one of its content .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(a)(ia) would apply only on amounts standing payable at the end of relevant previous year and not on the amounts paid during the relevant year. Learned D.R. did not raise any objection to the additional ground. Such additional ground is admitted being a pure question of law. 10. We have considered both the averments of the assessee. Insofar as reliance placed on the decision of Teja Constructions (supra) is concerned, there the books of accounts of the assessee were rejected and estimation of in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rced from the facts of that case. Here, books of the assessee were not rejected. Therefore, in our opinion, the said case would not help the assessee in any manner. Though Section 40 starts with nonobstante clause Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in sections 30 to 38….. , in our opinion, this would not mean that said section is not applicable on a deduction claimed under Section 28. We cannot say computation of business income will not be susceptible to the restriction mentioned u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r that the CIT(Appeals) has given relief to the assessee that the amounts are direct expenses incurred by the assessee in its business activity and are allowable u/s.28. There is no basis for such conclusion and it is not based on the examination of financial statement of the assessee to hold that the charges are direct expenses. We vacate that finding. 7. To support the deletion of addition by the CIT(Appeals), the ld. AR submitted that in view of the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his argument also, we find that there is no material before us to show that the payee has filed its return of income and offered the sum received to tax. Being so, this argument cannot be upheld. Finally, the ld. AR, submitted that the provisions of sec.194C of the Act cannot come into play when the payments have been made to agents of a non-resident company and relied on the order of the Kolkata Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Taj Leather Works v. ACIT (52 SOT 228). To uphold this argument .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be invoked. Considering the judgment of the Special Bench of the Tribunal, in the case of Merilyn Shipping and Transports v. ACIT (supra), we are inclined to remit the issue for fresh consideration. This ground is allowed for statistical purposes. 8. Next ground in the appeal of the Revenue is with regard to deletion of addition made in respect of employees contribution to PF and ESI remitted within the due date of filing the return of income. In this case, there is delay in remittance of employ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he case of CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (265 CTR 65), wherein their Lord-ships distinguished the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. (319 ITR 306) cited by the ld. AR, before us and observed as under: 7.07. Now so far as the reliance placed upon the decision of the Hon blee Supreme Court in the case of Alom Extrusions Ltd. (supra), by the learned ITAT as well as learned advocates appearing on behalf of the assessee in support of their submi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is concerned, on considering the controversy before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Alom Extrusions Ltd. (supra), the said decision would not be applicable to the facts of the present case. In the said case before Alom Extrusions Ltd., the controversy was whether the amendment in section 43B of the Act, vide Finance Act, 2003 would operate retrospectively w.e.f. 1/4/1988 or not. It is also required to be noted that in the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the controversy wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

econd Proviso to section 43(B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 1963 operates w.e.f. 1/4/2004 or whether it operates retrospectively w.e.f. 1/4/1988. Under the circumstances, the learned tribunal has committed an error in relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Alom Extrusions Ltd. (supra) while passing the impugned judgement and order and deleting disallowance of the respective sums being employees contribution to PF Account / ESI Account, which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

24 of section 2, it is held that with respect to the sum received by the assessee from any of his employees to which provisions of sub-clause (x) of clause (24) of section (2) applies, the assessee shall be entitled to deduction in computing the income referred to in section 28 with respect to such sum credited by the assessee to the employees account in the relevant fund or funds on or before the due date mentioned in explanation to section 36(1)(va). Consequently, it is held that the learned .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version