TMI Blog2014 (10) TMI 861X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he entire admitted duty liability besides not quantified the interest and paid the same - Held that:- The Bench considers that the application is not maintainable and liable for rejection for non-compliance of the provisions of clause (d) of proviso to Section 32E(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 since the additional amount of duty accepted by the applicant in his application should be paid alon ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cals Aash Organics, Mulund (East), Mumbai - 400 080, 5. Shri Deepak Viaywargla, Partner, M/s. Bestchem, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad - 500 012, 6. Shri Mahaveer Chand, Proprietor, M/s. Kaveri Industries, Jigani, 560 105, Bangalore South, 7. Shri Anup Kumar Chhawchharia, Director, M/s. ANR International Pvt. Ltd. (Previously known as M/s. Singhal Agencies Pvt. Ltd.), Laxmi Nagaar District Centre, Delhi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... opriate interest besides, imposition of penalty. The applications were assigned Application Nos. SA(E)120-131/2014-SC. 2. The applicants were issued notice under Section 32F(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944 on 17-10-2014/23-10-2014 directing them to explain as to why the applications should not be rejected for non-compliance of the provisions of clause (d) of proviso to Section 32E(1) of the Cent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... In this case, the due date for allowing the application to be proceeded with or rejecting the application is 31-10-2014. 5. The Bench considers that the application is not maintainable and liable for rejection for non-compliance of the provisions of clause (d) of proviso to Section 32E(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 since the additional amount of duty accepted by the applicant in his applic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
