TMI Blog2016 (1) TMI 769X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e case, following the Judgment of this court in Adlabs’ case [2010 (3) TMI 1087 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] and for the reasons stated therein, the instant appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. In view of the appeal being dismissed as not maintainable, answering the substantial questions of law in this appeal does not arise. - CEA No. 18/2015 - - - Dated:- 7-1-2016 - N. K Patil And S. Sujatha, J ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... service simplicitor in view of decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in; a. C K JIDHEESH v/s. UOI [2006 (1) STR 3 (SC)]. b. Rainbow Colour Lab Vs. State of M.P. [ 2002-TIOL-373-SC-CT] c. BSNL Vs. Union of India [2006-TIOL-15-SC-CT-LB] d. STO Vs. B.C. Kame 1976 (12) TMT 164 -Supreme Court of India e. S S Photographic Lab Pvt. Ltd., V/s. State of Assam Ors. (2011) 19 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 5. Submission of learned counsel for the appellant and respondent are placed on record. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, following the Judgment of this court in Adlabs case [supra] and for the reasons stated therein, the instant appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. In view of the appeal being dismissed as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
