Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

In Re : Dow AgroSciences Agricultural Products Ltd.

2016 (1) TMI 791 - THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI

Investment in equity shares of Dow Agrosciences India Private Limited - whether would be considered as ‘capital asset’ under section 2(14) of the Act? - whether capital gains arising from the proposed transfer of shares of DAS India by the Applicant to DAS Singapore (a company proposed to be incorporated in Singapore), would be subject to tax in India? - Held that:- There is no material before us to hold that the applicant has a PE in India and therefore, the income arising out of the transfer o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

raversed by the Revenue even at the cost of repetition that there is no material before us to hold that the applicant has any PE in India. In that view even if the gains that the applicant makes from the proposed transfer are treated as business income, even then there will be no question of taxation on those gains.

Application of Section 115JB - Held that:- With effect from 1.4.2015, the provisions of section 115JB would not be applicable to foreign company if the foreign company is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AA or as the case may be DTAC with India. Again we have already given a finding that the applicant does not have a PE in India. As such we answer this question in favour of the applicant holding that there will be no applicability of section 115JB to the applicant.

Applicability of the provisions of Section 92 to 92F - Held that:- Unless the transaction is taxable in India, there would be no application of Sections 92 to 95. Section 92 is not an independent charging section and would .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

taxable there will be no question of the applicability of section 195 of the Act. As per the Ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transmission Corporation of AP Ltd. vs. CIT [1999 (8) TMI 2 - SUPREME Court ].

Requirement to file return of income under section 139 - Held that:- No applicability of section 139(1) of the Act to the present applicant - A.A.R. No 1123 of 2011 - Dated:- 11-1-2016 - Mr V.S. Sirpurkar, Chairman, Mr. A.K. Tewary, Member (Revenue) and Mr. R.S. Shukla, Member .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

308, St.James Court, St Denis Street, Port Louis, Republic of Mauritius and is a tax resident of Mauritius. The Applicant is a part of Dow group of companies (together, hereinafter referred to as Dow Group or Group ). A copy of the Certificate issued by the Registrar of Companies in Mauritius and the Tax Residency Certificate of the Applicant has been enclosed as Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 respectively. 2. Dow Agrosciences India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as DAS India ), a compa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

5 27 January 2005 149,999,100 TOTAL 618,369,900 The balance 200 shares of ₹ 10 each have been acquired by DAS Agricultural Investment Holding Company Ltd. for an amount of INR 2,000. 4. It is further, pleaded that the applicant proposes to transfer these shares in favour of a Dow Group Entity Singapore and thus the Group entity Singapore hereinafter called SDA Singapore would be a transferee company. 5. This transfer is pleaded with an objective of the group re-organization. It is pleaded: .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as depending on its geographical locations: - North America - South America - Europe - Asia Pacific - Dow India, Middle East and Africa ( Dow IMEA group) iii) In the beginning of year 2010, the IMEA group was dismantled and countries in IMEA group were realigned to other regions as per geographical convenience. The Asia pacific region now consists of countries like India, China and other South East Asian countries. The Europe region, inter alia, consists of Mauritius, United Kingdom, Germany and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in view the above facts, Dow group is contemplating to shift the shareholding of DAS India from Mauritius to Singapore. vi) The Group believes that such re-alignment would help the Group to focus on customer service including support for new product launches, strong compliance culture, commitment to health, safety and the environment, and commitment to developing people that deliver strong results for the Group even as the external environment has become more demanding. 6. It is then claimed in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ibution. iv) The value of DAS Singapore s shares recorded in the books of DAS Mauritius would be considered as the sales consideration for transfer of shares of DAS India. v). The cost at which DAS Mauritius has obtained the shares of DAS India would be the cost of acquisition. vi). The Applicant also wishes to state that it does not have an office, or employee or agents in India and hence no permanent establishment in India as per Article 5 of the India Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agree .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he case, the investment held by the Applicant in equity shares of Dow Agrosciences India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as DAS India ) would be considered as capital asset under section 2(14) of the Act? (2) Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, whether capital gains arising from the proposed transfer of shares of DAS India by the Applicant to DAS Singapore (a company proposed to be incorporated in Singapore), would be subject to tax in India? (3) Based on the facts and cir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pplicant would be liable to pay minimum alternate tax under the provisions of section 115JB of the Act? (5) Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, if the proposed transfer of shares by the Applicant to DAS Singapore is not taxable, whether the provisions of section 92 to section 92F of the Act relating to transfer pricing would still be applicable? (6) Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, if the proposed transfer of shares by the Applicant to Dow Singapore is not taxable, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act, 1961. The applicant also relies on Section 226 and contends that it is not covered under any of the provisions thereof nor is it a company formed and registered as per the provisions of Indian Companies Act. It is more particularly pleaded that the applicant is not covered under clauses (i), (ia), (ib) (ii) and (iii). It is, therefore, claimed on the basis of the certificates issued by the Mauritian authorities that the applicant is neither an Indian Company nor the control and management .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dated 15.6.2007 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). It is reiterated that considering the accounting test and intention test as also quantum test and further relying on G.Venkata Swami Naidu and Company vs. CIT [1959] (35 ITR 594)(SC) as also Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh vs. CIT [1970] (77 ITR 253) (SC) as also the Ruling of this Authority in Praxair Pacific Ltd. AAR 855 of 2009. The equity shares held by it in DAS India should be considered as capital asset and not stock in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

isions in : (1) UOI vs. Azadi Bachao Andolan 2003 263 ITR 706 (SC) (2) CIT vs. Paul Kulangal Chettiyar 2004 267 ITR 654 (SC) as also the 2 other decisions by Hon ble Andhra Pradesh High Court and Kolkata High Court that where the provisions of DTAA are more beneficial the applicant could be able to avail of the same. The applicant also pleads that the CBDT Circulars are binding on the Revenue Authorities and as per the case law referred to above and some other decisions by the Delhi ITAT, there .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iled in all three reports in opposition to the application. This matter was admitted for final hearing by an Order dated 16.8.2012. In fact, the Revenue has opposed the admission of this matter raising some objections under section 245R(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred as Act ). However, those objections were ignored. However, it was mentioned in the Order dated 16.8.2012 that the question regarding a scheme for avoidance of payment of tax in India, as raised by the Revenue co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been supplied by the Revenue in para 5 of this reply dated 23.8.2015 wherein the factor of longevity of the applicant appears to be an admitted position. Reliance has been placed on the earlier decision of this Authority in M/s. WCT Mauritius, which decision is reported to be in challenge before the High Court. Be that as it may, we are not at all convinced that this company which has been operating for more than 10 years in Mauritius can be said to be a shell company. 15. It is then contended .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se and Vodafone International Holdings BV case. It is again reiterated that the whole scheme of the transfer of shares in favour of Singapore, amounted to a scheme to avoid payment of taxes. We are not in agreement with the contention of Revenue. Firstly, because the first transaction of the shares was on 6th September,1995, the 2nd was on 3rd March, 1997 and 3rd was in October, 1997, 4th was on 18th May, 2001 and 5th on 27 January, 2005, the following chart will highlight the situation:- Sr No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rred to a Singapore concern which is the own subsidiary of the applicant, it cannot amount to a design or a scheme to avoid payment of taxes in India. The applicant has relied on the details of the promoters of DAS India in their reply dated 28.9.2015. It is seen that DAS India was incorporated on 7th December, 1994. The investment made in the DAS India was with the prior approval of Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP). The subsequent investment also were with the approval of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on itself that it has no PE. Nothing has been brought by the Revenue that there is a PE in India. We therefore, do not hold that the applicant has a PE in India in the absence of any inputs which could have been provided by the Revenue. 19. In this behalf we accept the reiteration by the applicant that the applicant does not have an office or employees or agents in India and has also made declaration to this effect. The applicant has also reiterated that unless it has a PE in India, profits aris .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sment proceedings. 20. We have also taken into consideration the fact that Dow IMEA Group was dismantled in 2010 and that is how the need for realignment of the group arose whereby DAS entity was to be shifted from an entity which falls under Europe region to an entity which would fall in the Asia-Pacific region. This was to be done with a view to achieve better control. Singapore is one of the upcoming countries in Asia-Pacific region in the opinion of the applicant and therefore, the Dow group .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

contention raised by the applicant about its not having a PE in India. 21. Department has raised as many as 8 contentions in support of their contention:- I) huge royalty payment for technical license procured from the group II) huge service charges being paid in lieu of service agreement to DAS US and it s subsidiaries III) DAS INDIA is more of a trading company (for product of DAS, USA). In FY 09-10 it s trading purchases were ₹ 111.5 crore against total purchases of 251.7 crore of fini .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

employees. VIII) The transfer study suggest that control and guidance of the Indian operations are with DAS, USA and Indian entity is selling basically the end-products as registered, branded and marketed by DAS, USA. It is a fact that the product mix is completely USA based and there is no Research and Development activity in Indian entity or by Mauritius entity. 22. In our opinion all these contentions are irrelevant to the question of the applicant having a PE in India. Even during the oral a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

certificate issued in its favour. The learned representative also pointed out that the applicant carried no activity in India. It is also pointed out that in their earlier replies to the departmental objections, it was pointed out that the applicant did not have a office or employees or agents in India and therefore, there was no question of there being a PE in India particularly because of the 8 submissions made. We do not see as to how the 8 submissions which we have pointed out above would c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

finding is given that there could be no PE there would be no question of Article 13(2) of the Treaty been attracted. 23. In their report dated 23.8.2015, the Revenue is again reiterating that this was nothing but a scheme to avoid the payment of tax. We have already held that in the factual circumstances of the investment having been commenced about 20 years back and completed about 10 years back and the business consideration for reorganization of the group, such finding cannot be given. The a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

treaty shopping is not taboo. The applicant has also relied on the decision of AAR in E*Trade Mauritius Limited (324 ITR 1) - page number 344 to 369 which also reiterates the principles of treaty shopping. The other decisions relied upon by the applicant are M/s. Sanofi Pasteur Holding SA (354 ITR 316), Castleton Investment Ltd. (AAR No.999 of 2010) (252 CTR 131), Deere & Co.(337 ITR 277), Ardex Investments Mauritius Limited (AAR) (340 ITR 272), Armstrong World Industries Mauritius Multicons .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndia has not declared and distributed dividends since 2004 and therefore, to the extent of accumulated profits, sale proceeds should have to be assessed in India. We ignore this contention as it is not relevant. Considering the other factors like investment function made 20 years back etc., we are of the clear opinion that there is no scheme for the tax avoidance. We also do not accept the contention of the Revenue that it is a colorable device. 26. In their report dated 23.8.2015, the departmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.E. It is, therefore, pleaded that in this situation, capital gain will be computed in the hand of DAS USA. It is the alternate submission that in case it is submitted that DAS Mauritius, the applicant herein earn capital gains by sale of shares then the gain related to accumulated profit should be treated as dividend under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and India-Mauritius DTAA and applicant should be directed to pay the tax under this provision. In our opinion this stand of the department has no bas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ementary Circular No.2/2007 dated 15th June, 2007. Relying on the tests in these Circulars for distinguishing shares held as stock in shares and those held as investments, the applicant has contended that applying the key tests (1) accounting test, (2) intention test and (3) quantum test the shares held in DAS India would be clearly in the nature of the capital asset. The applicant has relied on G.Venkata Swamy Naidu and Company vs. CIT 1959 35 ITR 594 where the Hon ble Supreme Court has declare .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ia. It is also pointed out that the acquisition is from 1994 and obviously the intention was to hold these shares as investment. It is also pointed out that there have been no transaction in relation to the sale of these shares and the proposed transaction is the only transaction. Considering the whole long subject, we are of the opinion that these shares have to be held as capital asset. This takes us to the 2nd question. 27. As regards this question, the Revenue had firstly claimed in its repo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, while answering the question No.1, taking into consideration the 3 tests which we have referred to in the earlier paragraphs. 28. The further contention again raised by the Revenue in the Report dated 24.5.2013 that if these shares are not found to be business assets, then the gains from the sale thereof should be treated as capital gains. In answer to this the applicant submits that ordinarily the transfer of these shares would be taxable in India as per the provisions of Section 45. However, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a permanent establishment which an enterprise of a Contracting State has in the other Contracting State or of movable property pertaining to a fixed base available to a resident of a Contracting State in the other Contracting State for the purpose of performing independent personal services, including such gains from the alienation of such a permanent establishment (alone or together with the whole enterprise) or of such a fixed base, may be taxed in that other State. 3. Notwithstanding the prov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e only in that State. 5. For the purposes of this article, the term alienation means the sale, exchange, transfer, or relinquishment of the property or the extinguishment of any right therein or the compulsory acquisition thereof under any law in force in the respective Contracting States. 29. A glance at the provision of Article 13 would suggest that clause 1 and 3 are not applicable in the present case. Considering the nature of the assets (equity shares in an Indian Company) being transferred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment raised in its report dated 23.8.2015 was that DAS India and the 2nd generation wholly owned subsidiary is fit to be treated as a subsidiary/fixed place/ agency of DAS USA. The department has tried to plead before us that the capital gain in this transfer is arising to USA based DAS USA and not to Mauritian applicant and in case the Mauritian applicant is treated as a transferor then the transfer of capital asset fall under Article 13(2) of the Indo- Mauritius DTAA. We do not think that it i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

osed transfer they will be held by DAS Singapore in its own capacity and as a representative of DAS LLC. The applicant, therefore, plead that DAS LLC cannot be regarded as a beneficiary of transfer of shares. 31. However, we are of the clear opinion that there is no material before us to hold that the applicant has a PE in India and therefore, the income arising out of the transfer of shares should be treated as business income. We are unable to accept the claim of the Revenue regarding the PE. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch was gaining by the transfer of shares of the Indian company. We have discussed in paragraphs 22 to 24 of that Ruling and we rely on the same for the purposes of this Ruling also and hold that there would be no question of any taxation of Indian Law on the capital gains arising from the proposed transfer of shares of DAS India by the applicant to the DAS Singapore. 33. In view of our answer to Question No.1 it will not be necessary for us to consider question No.3. However, we make it clear th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t there is no material before us to hold that the applicant has any PE in India. In that view even if the gains that the applicant makes from the proposed transfer are treated as business income, even then there will be no question of taxation on those gains. 34. This brings us to Question No. 4, which is regarding the application of Section 115JB of the Act. The said question had arisen even in the case of our earlier judgment of AAR 1123. The question of applicability of section 115JB had aris .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the effect that government did not press to apply section 115JB to FII and FPIs for the period prior to 1.4.2015. It was pointed out that a Circular dated 2.9.2015 was issued by Govt. of India and the same was filed before the Hon ble Supreme Court and a statement was made by the Attorney General for India that the said Circular would be followed. The said Circular clearly mentions that the FIIs/FPIs having no PE/place of business in India would not be covered by section 115JB. In fact, a pre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

equired to seek registration under section 592 of the Companies Act, 1956 or section 380 of the Companies Act, 1956. It is clear that the present applicant is clearly covered as it is a company in Mauritius, which country has DTAA or as the case may be DTAC with India. Again we have already given a finding that the applicant does not have a PE in India. As such we answer this question in favour of the applicant holding that there will be no applicability of section 115JB to the applicant. 35. Qu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

apital gain from the international transaction since this income is not chargeable to tax in India in accordance with Article 13, there will be no question of the applicability of section 92 to 92F. The applicant rightly relies on the 3 Rulings: Dana Corporation [2010] (227 CTR 441) (AAR), M/s. Praxair Pacific Limited (326 ITR 276) and Vanenburg Group B.V. vs. CIT (289 ITR 464). We answer the question accordingly. 36. This puts us to the question No. 6. The answer in view of our conclusion that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

telton Investment Ltd and more particularly paragraphs 31,32,33 & 34 of that Ruling, that the applicant would be liable to file return under section 139. In the decision of Castleton Investment Ltd. the view was taken that when any person claims the benefit of DTAC, that person is invoking section 90 sub-section (2) of the Act to do so. A view was, therefore, taken that a person earning the income that is chargeable to be taxed under the Act, had to claim by invoking 90(2) for getting the be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version