Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

IN RE : Aker Contracting FP ASA

Consideration received under the ‘Change Order’ - whether is in the nature of business profits? - Taxability of income - providing ‘Floating Production Storage and Offloading’ (FPSO) - Fabrication and installation of new living quarters onboard the FPSO facility and procurement and installation of Heating, Ventilation Air Conditioning system (‘HVAC’) system onboard the living quarters - Major work was done outside India.

Held that:- The consideration received by the applicant under th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

taxable under the provisions of Section 44BB of the Act without splitting the same on the basis of travel of the FPSO outside or in India.

The consideration received on account of insurance receipts for loss of hire is not taxable in India. - A.A.R. No 867 of 2010 - Dated:- 2-12-2015 - Mr V.S. Sirpurkar (Chairman) and Mr. A.K. Tewary, Member (Revenue) For The Applicant : Mr. Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Urvi Thakkar, CA, Mr. Rahul Jain, CA, Mr. R.Satish Kumar, Advocate For The D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m used in the offshore oil and gas industry. The applicant is a tax resident of Norway. The applicant entered into a contract on 9th May 2007 (being referred to as original contract) with M/s Reliance Industries Limited (RIL). Under this contract the applicant was required to provide FPSO at the assigned oil and gas field in connection with extracting, prospecting or production of mineral oil, the consideration for this was on day rate release rental basis. Further the original contract specifie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or to be used in the prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil and such income having accrued in India was computed in terms of Section 44BB of the Income-tax Act and offered to tax accordingly. Similarly, the mobilization Revenue was also offered to tax on the same basis. 2. On 27th July 2008, the applicant signed a Change Order with RIL to facilitate the following amendments in the scope of work of the original contract dated 9th May 2007for a total sum of US Dollars 85 million. S.N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r to the FPSO sailing to India as envisaged in the original contract USD 15 million (c) Extending the dry-docking as envisaged in the original contract to 15 years. USD 25 million (However, RIL agreed and finally paid only USD 7 million to which the Applicant also agreed) (d) Expediting deliveries of topside modules and increasing productivity at Jurong Shipyard. USD 15 million (e) Timely installation of buoy and moorings in India USD 15 million 3. The consideration received as per the Change Or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n 44BB of the Act. 4. The events are summarized in chronological order as under:- Date Event 9th May 2007 Original contract with RIL December 2007/January 2008 Installation work in Indian waters 27th July 2008 Change Order with RIL signed August 2008 FPSO sailed from Singapore on 6 August 2008 and reached Indian waters on 12 August 2008. FPSO reached production site in Kakinada, India on 14 August 2008 September 2008 Production of first oil 5. The applicant has filed the application in respect o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

based on the stated facts of the case and in law, the consideration received by the Applicant under the Change Order for undertaking the following [before the floating production storage and offloading system, ( FPSO ) arrived in India], is in the nature of business profits or in the nature of fees for technical services as defined in the Explanation 2 of section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act )?: i Fabrication and installation of new living quarters onboard the FPSO facility and pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ths prior to the FPSO sailing to India instead of the scheduled timeline of six weeks prior to the FPSO sailing to India. 2) If the scope of work is in nature of business profits, would the consideration for the scope of work, as mentioned in question 1 above, be taxable in India even though it pertains to work performed wholly outside India? 3) Whether on the stated facts and in the circumstances of the case, the consideration received by the Applicant for installation of the buoy and moorings .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act? 5) Whether based on the stated facts and in law, the consideration received by the Applicant that is attributable to mobilization of the FPSO to the extent of the distance travelled by the FPSO outside India is taxable in India? 6) Whether on the stated facts and in the circumstances of the case, the consideration received by the Applicant on account of insurance receipts for loss of hire are chargeable to tax in India? Applicant s Submissions in the Application 6. Applicant s submission in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

performed by the applicant is in the nature of business profits because such receipts are arising from execution of a contract. Even in respect of work relating to mobilization it was stated that the applicant is simply undertaking the mobilization of the commissioning team along with members of Aker Borgestad (entity which will operate and maintain the FPSO) and major vendor representatives four months prior to the FPSO sailing to India instead of six weeks prior to the FPSO sailing to India, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e nature of business profits. B. Work performed outside India. The applicant has stated that as the entire scope of work was performed outside India, the consideration received cannot be said to accrue or arise in India. C. Income should be computed under section 44BB of the Act The applicant further states that in the event consideration received under the Change Order for revenue streams mentioned in question No.1 is deemed to be taxable in India, the income chargeable to tax should be compute .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lization revenue taxable in hands of the applicant should be restricted only to the revenues attributable to the distance travelled in Indian territorial waters as compared to the total distance travelled from Singapore yard to India. D. Work as per change order cannot be attributed to PE According to the applicant the STP buoy and moorings were installed in Indian waters in January 2008 and FPSO arrived at the production site only in August 2008. The consideration received was for the work done .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Mining or like project and accordingly would not be in the nature of FTS. Such activities should be liable to tax in accordance with the provisions of Section 44BB of the Act. Such installation services are the services or facilities in connection with the production of mineral oil and clearly fall under the ambit of Section 44BB of the Act. Accordingly, the additional compensation for timely installation of STP buoy and moorings should be computed having regard to the computational mechanism u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil nor are for the supply of plant or machinery on hire for prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil. Submissions during the course of arguments 7. During the course of arguments, the counsel of the applicant Mr. Pardiwala raised the following points also:- A. Even though the application filed did not address the issue as to whether the compensation paid pursuant to the Change Order is a capital or revenue receipt, it needs to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndent application and consideration thereof. The amount payable under the Change Order was not to be refunded or adjudicated in case of termination or pre-termination of the original contract. C. The consideration received towards the scope of work performed is entirely outside India and, therefore, it falls outside the purview of section 5 of the Act. The reliance was placed on the decision of Mumbai ITAT in the case of MC Dermott ETPM Inc. vs. DCIT 2008 303 ITR 445. D. The applicant has no bus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntitled for any consideration. F. The communication dated 6/8/2007 between RIL and the applicant show that the Applicant brought to the attention of the RIL that there will be a delay in delivery of topside module due to which the due date of first production of oil as agreed (under original contract) may not be achieved. Further, the applicant also provided a lump sum cost that would be incurred to accelerate the conversion of the FPSO and expediting the delivery of topside module at Jurong Shi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rovisions of section 44 BB of the Act provides for a method of computing income, if the same is chargeable to tax in India under section 4 read with section 5 of the Act. Thus, only once it is established that the consideration for the work executed under the change order is taxable in India, the computation provisions of section 44BB come into the picture. Accordingly, the scope of work mentioned being executed wholly outside India, the income earned by the applicant does not accrue or arise or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eaty a person who is a resident of a Contracting State (Norway, in the instant case) and carries on activities offshore in the other Contracting State (India), in connection with exploration or exploitation of the sea bed and sub-soil situated in that other state (India), shall subject to para 3 and 4 of this Article, be deemed in relation to those activities to be carrying on business in that other state (India) through a PE or fixed based situated therein. However, in the instant case, the App .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enue in nature. It was categorically categorized as business profits. The Revenue also objected to the new pleadings introduced during the course of arguments. 8. Department s Submissions A. Change Order is not a contract independent of the original contract. The Department has analyzed the terms of the original contract and various clauses and exhibits and has concluded as under:- (i) Clause 25 of the Original Agreement contains in itself the provision for the changes to be made as per specific .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Change Order in order to cover the design life of FPSO and moorings as prescribed in Exhibit B of the original order. In any case, the designed life was for a period of 15 years and it continues to remain so, the dry docking period only getting extended by a few years. (ii) The changes in Exhibit A and /or Exhibit B as contained in the Change Order falls under the definition of works as defined in the Original Agreement. Hence, the amount received on account of this is covered by the definit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paid whether by way of lump sum consideration or in installments can only represent the lease rentals. RIL had nothing to do with the changes if the vessel was not available for its use. The consideration paid by RIL cannot represent any other character than the lease rentals. (iii) As per the responsibility matrix in Exhibit A as well as Clause 30.1 of Annexure - I of the Contract, it is the responsibility of the contractor to bear the costs in relation to the delivery and landing of FPSO and m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it are integral transactions to the principal transactions that arise out of the original contract. In the cases of Hindalco Ind 94 ITD 242(Del), Mitsui Engg & Ship Building 259 ITR 248(Del), Ansaldo Energia SPA 210 ITR 237 (Mad), Motorola Inc 95 ITD 269 (Del)(SB), 107 ITD 120 (Del), HMS Real Estate 325 ITR 71 (AAR) and Alstom Transport 349 ITR 292 (AAR) it has been held that subsidiary and integral transactions have to take colours from the principal transaction itself and are not to be vie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ioned in the contracts that it had entered into with RIL. Therefore the entire consideration that it has received from RIL has to be taken together, the applicant cannot bifurcate them as lease rentals (which has been offered to tax u/s 44BB of the Act) and lump sum consideration for carrying out the works as specified in the change order (not offered to tax in India). C. The Department relies on the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited ( ONGC .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tment has further stated that the Hon ble Supreme Court held that the services rendered by various non-resident companies with which ONGC had entered into separate agreements for availing of diverse services (such as proviso of personnel with expertise and experience in operation and management of an oil rig, engineering and technical support, processing of seismic data, consultancy and training service, analysis of data, geological and feasibility study, inspection and repairs service etc.) wer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

In this particular instance it is providing its FPSO on lease to RIL. The lease rental received from RIL has been offered to tax as per the provisions of 44BB of the Act. (ii) The consideration received from RIL out of the change order, even if these be genuine orders for change in specifications, are on account of the modifications made in the FPSO to meet the requirements of RIL. It is not unusual for a customer to seek specific modifications. Had all the requirements in the FPSO been met with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

equent to the Change Order would receive the same treatment as the consideration flowing from the original agreement. (iii) The facilities on the FPSO prior to the modification by the Change Order and modification carried on consequent to the Change Order are inextricably linked with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil and, hence, were for mining and related/ancillary services, and, therefore, the consequent income in the hands of the assessee would be governed by the provisions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erations which is in India. E. The Department has argued that the applicant has installed buoy and moorings in India in order to fulfill its obligations (i.e. to provide its FPSO on lease rental basis to RIL to extract, receive, process, produce, store and offload crude oil and natural gas from the fields in India) as contained in the original contract that it had entered into with RIL. For this, the applicant was paid USD 15 million and the same was offered to tax in India u/s 44BB of the Act. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ence they are all attributable to the business operations carried in India and thus have business connection in India. F. It has been further argued by the Department that the considerations received by the applicant pursuant to the Change Order as mentioned by the applicant at point nos. 4(a) to 4(d) of their submission dt.7.10.2015 have not been offered to tax in India while the consideration out of the Change Order mentioned in point no.4(e) (i.e. installation of buoy and moorings in India) o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

050* 12,35,14,326 30.09.2009 2. 2010-11 46,06,81,020 19,45,45,595 15.10.2010 3. 2011-12 51,27,67,040 21,65,41,521 29.09.2011 4. 2012-13 59,99,61,580 23,95,20,650 28.09.2012 5. 2013-14 62,32,74,620 26,19,24,922 30.09.2013 6. 2014-15 72,15,02,880 31,21,22,146 30.09.2014 * Includes payments on account of installation of buoy and moorings in India as per the Change Order H. Reliance has been placed by the Department on the following language of Section 44BB(2)(a) of the Act: The amounts referred in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted in the wider sense by various courts in the cases of G&T Resources 1389 ITJ 568 (Del), ONGC 133 TTJ 663 (Del) etc. The use of the phrase in connection with would take care of the amount received by the applicant in connection with the Change Order. In the case of Sedco Forex International Inc. Vs CIT reported in 299 ITR 238, the Hon ble High Court of Uttaranchal has held that section 44BB(1) is a code in itself. I. According to the Department the amount received by the applicant pursuant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Department has further pointed out that the applicant has already offered the entire mobilization fee as per the original contract to tax u/s 44BB of the Act and the claim that the distance travelled outside is not taxable in India is an afterthought. The entire consideration arising out of the original contract as well as the Change Order is to be taxed similarly u/s 44BB of the Act. Inferences 9. We have examined carefully the applicant s interpretation of law filed along with the original a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

velopment area on lease rental basis, to extract, receive, process, produce, store and offload crude oil and natural gas from the field. II) The applicant (referred to as contractor in the agreement for chartering of FPSO in the agreement dated 9th May 2007) got the contract for carrying out the work in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in this agreement. In the agreement it has been mentioned that the contractor had sufficient technical capability, resources, equipment, man pow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g, Contractor s Personnel and technical support necessary for the performance of its obligations on the Work Site. IV) FPSO or Contractor s Equipment shall mean the Vessel converted to a floating, production, processing, storage and offloading facility with STP buoy and moorings meeting the FPSO Classification and including all equipment, materials, spare parts and supplies to be provided and/or supplies on such facility in order to meet the requirements of Exhibit A and Exhibit B. V) Exhibit A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acilities/requirements for operations including 104 air-conditioned living quarters with configuration of one bed, 2 beds and four bed cabins. VII) Clause 25 of the contract, under the headlines changes , contains provisions for changes in the original agreement. As per clause 25.1 RIL has the right at any time to require any reasonable change to Exhibit A and/or to Exhibit B by notice (Change Notice) provided that no such change shall impair or invalidate the Contract. Such changes may include .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct , which is contract dated 9th May, 2007 for chartering of FPSO in connection with the extraction and production of oil and gas as mentioned above. IX) The relationship of scope of work in the Change Order with that of the original contract is as under: (a) Fabrication and installation of all of 104 living quarters (Exhibit B Part-I clause 6E of the original contract already provided that the FPSO will have 104 quarters). (b) Installation of an independent HVSC system in the living quarters af .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ginal contract.) (e) Extending the dry docking period from 10 to 15 years. Clause 10 of the Change Order also mentions that changes agreed would not entitle the contractor to an extension of time under the contract and/or achieving of date of first production of oil except as specifically extended by this Change Order. X) Clause 30.1 of the original contract reads as under:- Contractor shall be responsible for all activities in connection with and make all arrangements for and bear all costs in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the work performed as per the change order by the applicant is in the nature of business profits . Repeatedly in respect of all 15 questions framed in the application it was argued by the applicant that the receipts arising from execution of a contract under the Change Order were in the nature of business profits. The applicant cited a number of Court Judgments to support this stand. When the questions were revised vide letter dated 17 February, 2011, the applicant again enclosed its own deta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt s interpretation of law regarding applicability of Section 44BB of the Act was that: Installation of STP buoy and moorings form an essential and integral part of operations of FPSO and the said activities are covered by provisions of Section 44BB of the Act. The applicant also referred to CBDT instructions and judicial precedents and in view of the same stated that the income arising to the applicant fall under the purview of Section 44BB and would be taxed as per the computational mechanism .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

regard to computational mechanism under Section 44BB of the Act and as regards mobilization revenue it was mentioned that the taxability of this should be restricted only to the revenue contributed to the distance travelled in the Indian territorial waters as compared to the distance covered from Singapore yard to India. XIII) As regards considerations received as per original contract the applicant (including mobilization revenue) in its returns filed from Assessment year 2009-10 to 2014-15 has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion for installation of buoys and moorings for tax under section 44BB of the Act and for other amount it is taking the stand that the same is not taxable. Further, during the course of arguments the applicant s counsel Mr. Pardiwala took some different stands. His first changed stand was that the consideration received pursuant to Change Order was a receipt on capital account contrary to the stand taken in the original as well as revised application that it was in the nature of business profits .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Having said this, we are going to deal with this argument. This argument is also based on the premise that the Change Order is independent of the original contract and has a separate scope of work for which separate consideration was received. This argument is completely flawed because as mentioned in earlier paragraphs the Change Order emanates from the original contract only. As mentioned in the facts narrated above, it is clearly seen that the Change Order has its genesis in Clause 25 of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ut amendments in their original contract No.0GF/13627982 dated 9.5.2007. It is mentioned upfront in clear terms in the change order. We have also seen that the original contract already had Clauses pertaining to provisioning of 104 living quarters and for HVSC systems. As per the Change Order the applicant has made 104 living quarters livable and installed new HVAC system by dismantling the existing one. In paragraph 9(IX) we have seen that the entire scope of work in the change order is nothing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

per which the contractor was to make the equipment suitably equipped with all necessary tools, equipments and manned with qualified and experienced personnel during commissioning. In the circumstances to separate the consideration for mobilization pursuant to the Change Order from mobilization consideration as per original contract is not at all possible. The fact remains that the Change Order does not alter the character of consideration received which is identical with that of consideration r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the applicant s counsel to make an artificial distinction between these two are not of any use. The case laws cited by him (CIT vs. Poona Electricity Company 14 ITR 622 and of Hoshiarpur Electricity Company vs. CIT 41 ITR 608) are in respect of definition of the term actual cost in Section 43(1) of the Act and are in entirely different and unrelated context which has not even remote application in the present case. Here the facts are strong enough to suggest and speaking loudly that Change Orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4BB cannot be invoked. He has cited the decision of Mumbai ITAT in the case of J Ray McDermott Eastern Hemisphere Stern Ltd (supra). In this context it is important to reiterate that as regards the consideration pursuant to the original contract the applicant has filed return in accordance with provisions of Section 44BB of the Act. As established clearly in earlier paragraph, the consideration received from the Change Order also bears the same character. As regards the case of J Ray McDermott S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

substantial question of law with regard to status of the assessee or having a permanent establishment or not will arise for consideration. The appeal is clearly devoid of any merits and, therefore, it is dismissed. In this context the provisions of Section 44BB (2) (a) is reproduced below: (a) the amount paid or payable (whether in or out of India) to the assessee or to any person on his behalf on account of the provision of services and facilities in connection with, or supply of plant and mac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd whether provisions of section 44BB would override Section 5. It was held by the Hon ble High Court of Uttrakhand as under:- Here in the present case, provisions of Section 5 and Section 9 are not attracted. Section 4 is a charging Section and Section 5 contains the scope of total income, which provides that subject to the provisions of this Act, the total income of any previous year of a person who is a resident includes all income as described under this Section and Section 9 provides the in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

44BB is a special provision relating to non-resident assessee who is providing services and facilities in connection with, or supply of plant and machinery on hire used, or to be used, in the prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils in or outside India. The Section is a complete code in itself. This Authority has also taken a view in the case of Geofizyka Torun Sp.zo and Bergen Oilfield Services AS that there is no scope under the provision of Section 44BB to split revenue a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

business was complicated. So, a lower tax @ 10% (as against higher tax on FTS and on net basis) on deemed profits and gains of the aggregate amount as specified in sub section (2) was prescribed, without splitting up the amount on the basis of place of payment. The Memorandum explaining the provisions (165 ITR st 161-62) stated that The computation of the taxable income of a taxpayer engaged in the business of providing services and facilities in connection with, or supplying plant and machiner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, on account of provision of such services or facilities or supplying plant and machinery for the aforesaid purposes…… Therefore, there is no scope of splitting up the amount paid in or outside India. 12. It is established beyond doubt in earlier paragraphs that the consideration received as per Change Order is similar to consideration received as per original contract. It is also established that both original contract and amendments therein by way of Change order are inextricably .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

material whether work relating to preparation of the FPSO was done in India or outside India. Further Section 44BB does not make any distinction between amount paid in India or outside India and, therefore, the entire amount has to be considered for the purpose of computation under this Section. This is the reason that applicant has taken the same stand in the return filed from Assessment Year 2009-10 onwards and has offered the consideration received as per original contract as per the provisio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

point out that the scope of work as per Change Order has not changed as compared to that in the original contract. The applicant s arguments is based on the stand that it, being a resident of Norway, does not carry on any activity offshore in India while performing its obligations under the Change Order and, therefore, provisions of Article 23 are not applicable. Again, this stand is based on the distinction between original contract and change order and is different from the stand taken in res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sis to extract, receive, process, produce, store & offload crude oil and natural gas from development area in India and all activities and works connected with this including its preparation for chartering are inextricably linked with the main work. In fact the applicant is carrying on its primary business activity, i.e., providing the FPSO on lease rental basis to extract, receive, process, produce, store and offload crude oil and natural gas from the development area (contract area in Indi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version