GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (1) TMI 840 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (1) TMI 840 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Redemption fine along with penalties - clandestine removal - non-duty paid stock - Held that:- As out of total seized goods of ₹ 73,28,787/-, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) held that goods amounting to ₹ 18,27,926/- is liable for confiscation on the ground that M/s. Metro was not able to show the invoices for the same. The appellant has contended that they are receiving wire and cables of spools and selling the wire and cables after cut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ine removal against M/s. Pymen Cable has been set aside, then from where, Metro procured such wire and cables. In these circumstances, the contention of M/s. Metro is acceptable that there is marginal difference of 2% of stock in excess is due to excess length of wire and cables on spool being a trade practice. As they are receiving wire and cable of spools and on having spools on wires and cables on extra length. In these circumstances, the excess stock of ₹ 18,27,926/- is not liable for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2010-(SM) - Dated:- 4-12-2015 - Ashok Jindal, Member (J) For the Appellant : Shri Naveen Mullick, Adv For the Respondent : Shri BB Sharma, AR ORDER Per Ashok Jindal The appellants are in appeal against the impugned order imposing redemption fine of ₹ 2 lakh on M/s. Metro Electricals (P) Ltd. and imposing penalties on Shri Sandeep Garg and Shri Vinod Garg. 2. The facts of the case are that on 12.1.2007, the officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence visited the factory .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rious penalties were also imposed on the appellants. The said order was challenged before the learned Commissioner (Appeals) who hold that goods worth ₹ 18,27,926/- is liable for confiscation out of seized goods valued at ₹ 73,28,787/-, and imposed a redemption fine of ₹ 2 lakhs, and also imposed penalty on Shri Sandeep Garg of ₹ 50,000/- under Rule 26 and on Shri Vinod Garg a penalty of ₹ 10,000/- under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Aggrieved from the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es and cables from M/s. Pymen Cable India and also from S B Industries, Delhi. M/s. K R Electricals, India, M/s. Carto Cable India, M/s. Rana Enterprises, M/s. Parul Agencies, M/s. Keshosis Industries, M/s. S B Systems, M/s. C I Electric Company, M/s. Raj Electric Company and many other suppliers and also produced all records of sale and purchase during the course of investigation. The charge of clandestine removal by M/s. Pymen Cables of goods lying in godown of M/s. Metro was only on the basis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arginal difference of wire and cable sold in length, on this account due to the reason that wire and cable on spools is having marginal excesses, the difference in stock of ₹ 18,27,926/- when compared to the total purchase of ₹ 8.5 crores worked out to be 2%. Therefore, it cannot be said that goods in question is not duty paid stock. Learned Commissioner (Appeals)has not given any credence to these submissions and there is no other evidence on record to show that M/s. Metro has purch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on Shri Sandeep Garg, he submits that M/s. Metro has not been penalized and Shri Sandeep Garg is director of M/s. Metro, therefore, the penalty cannot be imposed on him. Moreover, the penalty imposed on Shri Vinod Garg have not legal sanctioned as the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has already held that charge of clandestine removal against M/s. Pymen Cables is only the based on presumption and surmises and Shri Vinod Garg is the proprietor of M/s. Pymen Cables India. As M/s. Pymen Cables India .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

duty to M/s. Metro. After thorough investigation, the adjudicating authority confirmed the charge of clandestine removal of goods. On appeals, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has observed that the allegation of clandestine removal against M/s. Pymen Cables is based on presumption and surmises. As the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has dropped the charge of clandestine removal of goods, in these circumstances, the penalty on Shri Vinod Garg, Proprietor of M/s. Pymen Cables is not imposable whe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

12-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version