Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Meerut I Versus M/s Dixon Utilities & Export (P) Ltd.

Area based exemption availed under Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10/06/2003 - effect of correction in the name of village / area in the notification - Held that:- Observation made by the Tribunal in the case of Tirupati LPG Industries Ltd. vs. CCE, Meerut - I (2015 (10) TMI 622 - CESTAT NEW DELHI ) wherein in the identical situation this Tribunal hold that -just because the village in which Industrial area falls was wrongly mentioned and village name is corrected by amending notification, wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Decided in favour of assessee. - Excise Appeal No. 687 of 2007 with CO No. 152 of 2007 - Final Order No. 53500/2015 - Dated:- 18-11-2015 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) And Shri B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) For the Petitioner : Ms. Neha Garg, Authorized Representative (DR) For the Respondent : Shri Amit Jain, Advocate ORDER Per. Ashok Jindal :- Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the learned Commissioner (Appeals) allowed area based exemption availed by the resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as their address and factory is situated therein. The Range Superintendent wrote a letter to the respondent to say that the factory situated at Plot No. C-3/1 and 262 M, Central Hope town, Pargana Pachwadun, Tehsil Vikasnagar as certified by Tehsil Vikasnagar does not get covered under Notification No. 50/2003-CE ibid. The respondent reply that they would like to establish their second establishment of line on plot No. 262, Selaqui Industrial Area, Selaqui and they are entitled for exemption as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ated 24/11/2003 of Survey Naib Tehsildar regarding location of Khasra No. 262 and Plot No. C-3/1 of the unit and copy of Lease Rent Agreement dated 17/09/2003. Thereafter verifying certain records the Adjudicating Authority allowed the exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE ibid on the clarification that the Khasra No. 262 of the unit is covered at Sl. No. 11 of Annexure II appended to the Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10/06/2003 in Selaqui Industrial Area, Selaqui, Dehradun. The said o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ory is located at Central Hope Town, whereas as per a certificate of Naib Tehsildar the factory is located in Selaqui Village therefore they are not entitled for exemption. It is also submitted that the said notification was amended by Notification No. 27/2005-CE dated 19th May, 2005 wherein the Village Selaqui was substituted by the word Central Hope Town and Camp Road. Therefore, from the said notification also it is clear that prior to 19th May 2005 the respondent are not entitled to avail ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tribunal in the cases of CCE, Hyderabad vs. Restile Ceramics Ltd. reported in 2008 (11) S.T.R. 245 (Tri. - Bang.), CCE, Hyderabad vs. Arch Pharmalabs Ltd. reported in 2009 (239) E.L.T. 381 (Tri. - Bang.), CC & CE, Hyderabad IV vs. Gland Pharma Ltd. reported in 2012 (280) E.L.T. 270 (Tri. - Bang.), CCE, Indore (M.P.) vs. Ambika Refinery reported in 2014 (299) E.L.T. 384 (Tri. - Del.). 5. On merits he submits that the case is squarely covered by the decision of Tirupati LPG Industries Ltd. vs. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndent seems to be valid. On merits also, we find that a similar/identical issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of Tirupati LPG Industries Ltd. vs. CCE, Meerut I (supra), wherein this Tribunal observed as under :- 7. As regards, the first point of dispute, the factory in which both the units are located is on Khasra Nos. 235, 237, 238/2 and 238/2 in village Central Hope Town, Tehsil Vikasnagar, of district Dehradun. In Annexure II, under Existing Industrial Estates/Regions of District D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2003-CE dated 10/06/2003 was amended and against Sl. No. 11 of the existing Industrial Estates/Regions of District, Dehradun in Annexure II, the entry Selakui under column No. 3 pertaining to village, was substituted by Village Selakui, Central Hope Town and Camp Road . The Department s contention is that only w.e.f. 19/5/2005 the Khasra No. of the appellant unit got covered under the Notification No. 50/2003-CE and during period prior to 19/5/2005 the appellant unit would not be eligible for th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Annexure III appended thereto. The Industrial areas, Industrial estates etc. are specified in Annexure II and III, while the 2nd column mentions the name of the Industrial area, Industrial estate etc. the 3rd and 5th columns mention the village and the Tehsil under which the Industrial area/Industrial estate etc. falls. Column 4 mentions the khasra number of the plots of land of which the Industrial area/Industrial estate comprises. In this case the appellant s factory is located at Khasra No. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ified Industrial area and therefore eligible for exemption even during the period prior to 19/5/2005. By notification No. 27/2005-CE dated 19/5/2005, against Sl. No. 11 of the list of existing Industrial areas of District Dehradun given in Annexure II, only the name of the village mentioned in 3rd column against Selakui Industrial Region was changed from Selakui to Village Selakui, Central Hope Town and Camp Road . The amendment by Notification No. 27/2005-CE, dated 19/5/2005, by which the name .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version