Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s PRAKRIYA PHARMACHEM THRU ITS CURRENT PARTNER AND 4 Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 7

2016 (1) TMI 946 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Reopening of assessment - capital gain addition - Held that:- Under sub-clause (iii) of section 47 of the Act, therefore, nothing would apply to any transfer of capital assets under a gift or will or irrevocable trust. It is not the case of the Assessing Officer that the present case is not one of transfer of asset under a gift. In terms of sub-clause (iii) of section 47 of the Act, thus such transfer would not be governed by section 45 of the Act. For apparent reasons, the proviso to subsection .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ain body of sub-clause (iii) of section 47 of the Act and consequently, the provision of section 45 of the Act pertaining to capital gain would not apply.

Also proviso to section 48 would not apply in the case on hand. Firstly section 48 of the Act itself provides for mode of computation of income chargeable as capital gain. Sub-clause (iii) of section 47 of the Act excludes application of section 45 of the Act in case of certain transfers. By no application of section 48 of the Act, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

therefore, mode of computation provided under section 48 of the Act would simply not apply. Thus The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer to form belief that the income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment lack validity. - Decided in favour of assessee - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20492 of 2015 - Dated:- 18-1-2016 - MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. MOHINDER PAL, JJ. FOR THE PETITIONER : Mr.S.N. SOPARKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH Mr.B.S. SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : MR SUDHIR M MEHTA, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ff). Such return was accepted without scrutiny. Thus, no scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short) came to be framed in that case. 3. The Assessing Officer, in order to re-open such assessment, issued the impugned notice dated 24.02.2015 at the request of the petitioner. He also supplied reasons recoded by him for issuing notice. Such reasons read read as under: .. .. It is seen that the assessee has transferred 5,30,410 shares during year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s were rejected by the Assessing Officer by order dated 07.10.2015. Hence the petition. 5. Inviting our attention to the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reasons lack validity. On the basis of such reasons the Assessing Officer could not have formed a belief that the income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. He submitted that the petitionercompany had transferred total of 4,82,410 shares to its sister concern-company without charging .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on contending that return of the assessee was accepted under section 143(1) of the Act without scrutiny. There was no opinion formed by the Assessing Officer on the tax liability of the income in question as held by the Supreme Court in case of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers P. Ltd., reported in 291 ITR 500 (SC). It is not necessary at this stage for the Assessing Officer to establish conclusively that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

veri Stock Brokers P. Ltd. (supra) reversed the judgment of the High Court, by which the High Court had allowed the writ petition, in which the assessee had challenged validity of the notice for re-opening of an assessment which was originally accepted under section 143(1) of the Act. 6.1 Counsel drew our attention to the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer to contend that 5,30,410 shares of the assesseecompany which were transferred without any consideration valued at ₹ 7.63 crores .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se where scrutiny assessment has been framed. This would be so since there would be no opinion formed by the Assessing Officer while accepting return under section 143(1) of the Act without scrutiny. Consequently, therefore, the question of change of opinion would not arise. This is in sum and substance held by the Supreme Cort in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers P. Ltd. (supra). It is on this ground that the Supreme Court had in the case of Deput .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer must be prima facie and at the stage when the Court is testing validity of such a notice; it would not be necessary for the Assessing Officer to conclusively establish that the income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. 8. In the case of Inductotherm (India) P. Ltd. Vs. M. Gopalan, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) Division Bench of this Court, in the context of reopening of assessment which was framed without scrutiny held and observed as under: 13. Despite such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year. This power to reopen assessment is available in either case, namely, while a return has been either accepted under section 143(1) of the Act or a scrutiny assessment has been framed under section 143(3) of the Act. A common requirement in both of cases is that the Assessing Officer should have reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. 14. xxx xxx 15. xxx xxx 16. It wo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

several other decisions, such reason to believe need not necessarily be a firm final decision of the Assessing Officer. 17. If we accept such proposition, the petitioner's apprehension that the Assessing Officer would arbitrarily exercise powers under section 147 of the Act to circumvent the scrutiny proceedings which could not be framed in view of notice under section 143(2) having become time barred, would be taken care of. To reiterate, even for reopening of an assessment which was accept .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r was ₹ 7.63 crores (rounded off). This transfer had taken place in favour of M/s Nerka Chemicals Pvt Ltd without consideration under transfer deed dated 26.02.2010. In view of such facts, the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that the income chargeable to tax in excess of ₹ 1,00,000/- had escaped assessment. 10. For multiple reasons we are convinced that these reasons lack validity. The first and foremost, reasons themselves record merely the transaction and nothing more. Quit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

liability on the petitioner. Section 45 of the Act, as is well known, pertains to capital gains. Subsection (1) thereof in particular provides for charging of tax on any profit or gain from transfer of capital assets as deemed income of the assessee for the previous year in which transfer took place. Section 47 of the Act pertains to transaction not regarded as transfer. Subclause (iii), which is relevant for our purpose reads as under: 47. Nothing contained in section 45 shall apply to the foll .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this behalf. Under sub-clause (iii) of section 47 of the Act, therefore, nothing would apply to any transfer of capital assets under a gift or will or irrevocable trust. It is not the case of the Assessing Officer that the present case is not one of transfer of asset under a gift. In terms of sub-clause (iii) of section 47 of the Act, thus such transfer would not be governed by section 45 of the Act. For apparent reasons, the proviso to subsection (iii) of section 47 of the Act would not apply .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the Act and consequently, the provision of section 45 of the Act pertaining to capital gain would not apply. 12. An attempt was made by the Assessing Officer to apply further to proviso to section 48 of the Act. Section 48 of the Act pertains to mode of computation. It essentially provides that the income chargeable under the head Capital gains shall be computed, by deducting from the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer of the capital asset the foll .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version